Distinct - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: distinct Year: 2016 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.682 seconds)Jindal Stainless Ltd. and Anr. Vs. State of Haryana and Ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-11-2016
..... become wholly redundant the court declared that the constitution had treated taxation as distinct from compulsory acquisition of property and has made independent provisions giving protection against ..... police power or eminent domain our constitution evidently has also treated taxation as distinct from compulsory acquisition of property and has made independent provision giving protection against .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPetitioner Vs. Respondent
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-21-2016
..... is entitled to protection as valuable intellectual property right against imitation these features constitute distinctive trade dress and get up which is entitled to protection as trade mark against ..... containers of the plaintiffs therefore constitute valuable intellectual property right entitled to protection as distinctive trademarks 5 2 the sales turn over of these products as per the documents .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAdvance Magazine Publishers, Inc. and Another Vs. M/s. Just Lifestyle ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-19-2016
..... mark being without due cause and resulting into unfair advantage of and detriment to the distinctive character and reputation of the plaintiffs registered trade mark the plaintiffs are entitled to ..... the infringing mark without due cause and iii unfair advantage or detriment caused to the distinctive character or reputation of the registered trade mark besides identity or similarity between the rival .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNabam Rebia and Etc. Etc. Vs. Deputy Speaker and Ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-13-2016
..... to constitutional matters i think it appropriate to reproduce the said passage the fundamental distinction between the constitutional law or the fundamental law and the ordinary laws referred to ..... exercising his individual judgment 14 apart from this explicit expression of intent the overall distinction between the two expressions in his discretion and his individual judgment was understood and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPeople Interactive (India) Private Limited Vs. Vivek Pahwa and Others
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-14-2016
..... trade mark protection granted to a narrowly defined class to be broadened to goods demonstrably distinct in character quality and purpose this rubber band approach of stretching statutory rights to ..... brewing class of generic or commonly descriptive words this is the lowest end of the distinctiveness spectrum and absent other proof it is entirely immobilized incapable of moving anywhere further .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S Az Tech (India) & Anr. Vs.m/s Intex Technologies (India) Ltd. & An ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-24-2016
..... that the mark is arbitrary in its application to mobile phones and accordingly is inherently distinctive being entitled to the highest degree of trademark protection further ms singh has stated ..... seeking protection before this court 26 marks are generally classified into five categories of increasing distinctiveness these are 1 generic 2 descriptive 3 suggestive 4 arbitrary or 5 fanciful this .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTN. Satish and Others Vs. State of Karnataka, Represented by its Princi ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-10-2016
..... the provision under which they are covered are different hence they form two separate and distinct classes therefore they can be subjected to two different sets of conditions rules and regulations ..... other person therefore as the state has classified the aggregator and the operator as two distinct and separate classes the former cannot complain that the similar set of liabilities and responsibilities .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Financial Times Ltd. Vs.the Times Publishing House Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-07-2016
..... financial times by ftl in india which could be considered sufficient to infer acquired distinctiveness of the trademark xvi that the registrar of trademarks yet waived his objection and ..... must equally apply to proceedings before registrar ipab including in formation of opinion of descriptive distinctive and reputation the cross examination of deponents of affidavit evidence thus does not serve .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSatish N Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-10-2016
..... the provision under which they are covered are different hence they form two separate and distinct classes therefore they can be subjected to two different sets of conditions rules and regulations ..... other person therefore as the state has classified the aggregator and the operator as two distinct and separate classes the former cannot complain that the similar set of liabilities and responsibilities .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAdvocates' Forum for Social Justice rep. by its President, Mr. K. Balu ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-26-2016
..... limitation on the constitutional right 61 modern theory of constitutional rights draws a fundamental distinction between the scope of the constitutional rights and the extent of its protection insofar ..... limitation on the constitutional right 61 modern theory of constitutional rights draws a fundamental distinction between the scope of the constitutional rights and the extent of its protection insofar .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial