Distinct - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: distinct Year: 1968 Page 1 of about 851 results (0.03 seconds)imperial Tobacco Co. of India Ltd. Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks and an ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-28-1968
Reported in: AIR1968Cal582,73CWN169
..... of the application for registration with the assertion that the geographical name has acquired distinctiveness and so qualified for registration 12 the registrar finds that the appellants have no ..... but the magnitude of advertisement expenses does not by itself prove that they have acquired distinctiveness on the contrary there may be articles or goods over which comparatively little advertisement .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPrem N. Mayor and ors. Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-24-1968
Reported in: AIR1969Cal80
..... the respondent pannalal agarwal s ma durga brand are entirely distinct and separate there is no phonetic similarity there is no ..... more celestial in the present case they are therefore sufficient distinctive characteristics of this device for which the respondent pannalal agarwal ..... trade mark was not at the commencement of the proceedings distinctive of the goods of the registered proprietor 17 except .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSarat Chandra Biswal and anr. Vs. Surendra Mohanty, Editor kalinga and ...
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Aug-07-1968
Reported in: AIR1969Ori117; 1969CriLJ763
..... the apprehension in the mind of the persons present that the distinction offered to dr mahtab on the occasion had the effect ..... correct to dissociate them from the other paragraphs and consider them distinct from the context in which they have appeared apart from these ..... court on analysis paragraph 20 contains the following allegations firstly the distinction offered to dr h k mahtab has had the effect .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJoginer Singh Vs. Pushpa
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-20-1968
Reported in: AIR1969P& H397
..... even with civil criminal or revenue matters but otherwise there is a clear line of distinction running throughout that only there are three types of jurisdictions civil criminal and revenue ..... observed as follows in this connection it should be remembered that there is a fundamental distinction between want of jurisdiction and irregular assumption of jurisdiction and that whereas an order passed .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJones Vs. Alfred H. Mayer Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-17-1968
..... former confederate states all laws establishing any oligarchical privileges and any distinction of rights on account of color or race and would ..... the aegis of a state or locality the only significant distinction was that denials which occurred in consequence of a state ..... stated that t his bill declares all persons who enforce those distinctions to be criminals against the united states footnote 3 34 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTindal Employees' Co-Operative Society Ltd. Vs. State of Orissa and Two ...
Court: Orissa
Decided on: May-08-1968
Reported in: 34(1968)CLT745; [1968]22STC460(Orissa)
..... question whether societies registered under the societies registration act are corporate bodies and as such distinct legal entities the position of a co operative society with which we are concerned ..... trading literary scientific and religious societies and other associations and the third part is a distinct power relating to co operative societies which has been expressly excluded from the purview .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax, Kerala Vs. Travancore Sugars and Chemicals ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Apr-05-1968
Reported in: [1969]71ITR385(Ker)
..... profit can be ascertained only by making the permissible deductions there is a clear cut distinction between deductions made for ascertaining the profits and distributions made out of profits in a ..... profit can be ascertained only by making the permissible deductions there is as clear cut distinction between deductions made for ascertaining the profits and distributions made out of profits in a .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThakkar Vithalbhai Hargovind and anr. Vs. Kachhia Jagjivan Motilal (De ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Sep-24-1968
Reported in: (1969)10GLR288
..... not necessary for decision of the case while we can appreciate the distinction which is sought to be made by mr shah we are ..... as provided in the act and before the court indicated therein the distinction therefore that is sought to be made by their lordships of ..... remedy for arbitration questions to be decided then we cannot make a distinction that in respect of a sham transaction a court which has no .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMac. Laboratories Private Ltd. Vs. American Home Products Corporation ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-14-1968
Reported in: AIR1969Cal342
..... these three marks are invented marks and are therefore prima facie distinctive all these three marks are in respect of class 5 ..... appeal a short reference will be necessary to explain why this distinction was made in india the trade marks enquiry coimmittee s ..... the public goods of the distributors manufacture the mark was now distinctive of the distributor he moved to have the existing registration .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTR. B. Seth Moolchand Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Mar-28-1968
Reported in: [1968]70ITR245(Raj)
..... ltd v commissioner of income tax has held that there was distinction between acquistion of an income earning asset and the process of ..... case observed that they were in entire agreement that such a distinction is not only possible but also sensible in pingle industries case ..... case all that can be said is that there was a distinction without any difference our answer therefore to the second question .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial