Distinct - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: distinct Year: 2012 Page 1 of about 301 results (0.042 seconds)M/S. Times Publishing House Ltd and Another Vs. M/S. the Financial Tim ...
Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB
Decided on: Apr-04-2012
..... laws of england and specifically referred to article 878 which deals with the evidence of distinctiveness and the evidence required which must place the matter beyond reasonable doubt and stronger ..... of india and others therefore unless the applicant tphl had proved that mark had attained distinctiveness the registration ought not to have been granted the applicant tphl knew about the existence .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHindustan Unilever Limited Vs. M/S. Three-n-products (P) Ltd. and Anot ...
Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB
Decided on: May-18-2012
..... ayur has not acquired a secondary meaning section 32 requires the mark to obtain distinctiveness at the commencement of the proceedings the learned counsel submitted that the respondent cannot in ..... in that case witnesses had been examined to prove that the offending mark had acquired distinctiveness and the word distinguished the goods of the respondent in the present case the respondent .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Himalaya Drug Company Vs. M/S. S.B.L. Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-09-2012
..... registrable trade mark under section 9 except upon evidence of distinctiveness and that such evidence was not submitted to the registrar ..... questioned on the basis of the ground of lack of distinctive character given the aforesaid backdrop of the conclusiveness of the ..... and it was shown that the expression vaporub had become distinctive of the plaintiffs goods in jamaica an action for infringement .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Hindustan Unilever Limited and Another Vs. M/S. Girnar Exports, T ...
Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB
Decided on: Jan-02-2012
..... and yellow with white lettering is uncommon and unique and therefore the mark is inherently distinctive the learned counsel also submitted that the appellant has already secured registration of label mark ..... the tea drinking public we are not sure that alone would be sufficient to establish distinctiveness these affidavits have been sworn to in 2004 they are post opposition proceedings evidence and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Videocon Industries Limited Vs. M/S Whirlpool of India Limited
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-13-2012
..... relatable to improved functionality but it makes it desirable according to whirlpool it is this distinctive shape which has made this machine a marketing success merely by placing certain ornamentations ..... for any other practical purpose but capriciously in order purely to give the article a distinctive appearance characteristic of that particular manufacturer s goods in such a case the manufacturer .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCostal Gujarat Power Limited Vs. Chief Controlling Revenue Authority a ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Dec-03-2012
..... contended that the section 5 if at all applies to a situation where several distinct matters or distinct transactions are clubbed in one single instrument because the said section presupposes existence ..... of various beneficiaries but the said fact in itself does not fictionally create separate distinct matters transactions involving various lending banks for the purposes of section 3 read with .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTata Sky Limited, Mumbai and Others Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu Throug ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-19-2012
..... for interpretation especially with respect to the entries on taxation pointing out to the distinction between entries empowering the particular legislature to legislate on regulatory statutes and the ..... which the particular legislation is undertaken this must be based on some reasonable distinction between the cases differentially treated when differential treatment is not reasonably explained and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCoal India Limited Versu Anadian Commercial Corporation
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-20-2012
..... the constitution of an arbitral tribunal in an international commercial arbitration and made a distinction between the juridical seat of the arbitration and the physical or geographical value thereof ..... the juridical seat of arbitration has been accepted by the supreme court indeed the distinction and its implication resonate through the judgment in yograj infrastructure limited though there are .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Videocon Industries Limited Vs. M/S Whirlpool of India Limited
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-13-2012
..... relatable to improved functionality but it makes it desirable according to whirlpool it is this distinctive shape which has made this machine a marketing success merely by placing certain ornamentations ..... for any other practical purpose but capriciously in order purely to give the article a distinctive appearance characteristic of that particular manufacturer s goods in such a case the manufacturer .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnion of India and Others Vs. Vinod Kumar JaIn and Another
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2012
..... that tribunal declined jurisdiction in similar circumstances 8221 49 the petitioners had maintained the distinction between afles and dfles till 2008 when the said posts were re designated as ..... any service even in mohammad shujat ali1 where the constitution bench while reiterating that distinction in qualification was valid criterion for determining eligibility for promotion except where both held .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial