Dispute - Judgment Search Results
Arbitration and Conciliation Centre vs Smt. Meenakshi K M
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR REVIEW PETITION NO.250 OF 2025 BETWEEN: ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION CENTRE (DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL) BENGALURU, III FLOOR, EAST WING KHANIJA BHAVANA, RACE COURSE ROAD BENGALURU -
Arbitration Case No. 53 of 2012 Vs. State of Haryana and Another
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-09-2012
these petitions filed by the same petitioner, the petitioner seeks appointment of an independent Arbitrator to decide the disputes which have arisen out of contracts awarded by the respondents to the petitioner. Subject matter of Arbitration Case
Arbitration Case No. 125 of 2011 Vs. M/S Natt Galary and Another.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
the aforesaid sum have arisen out of franchise agreement dated 15.05.2009 which contains arbitration clause and therefore, the disputes are to be settled through arbitration. That is the reason for filing the present petition.2. The following back
18-section briefs on any result in this list
The Dispute Pertains to Entitlement of Pensionary Benefits of Vs. Stat ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-13-2014
Kaur a lady of more than 80 years old is sought to be examined as her witness.2. The dispute pertains to entitlement of pensionary benefits of Mehan Singh-deceased. The petitioner/plaintiff claims herself to be one of the
“The Matrimonial Dispute Between the Parties Had Vs. State of Punjab ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-30-2014
mother-in-law. On 5.12.2013, while issuing notice of motion, the following order was passed by this Court:- “The matrimonial dispute between the parties had been referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre and both the parties had appeared
Arbitration Case No. 43 of 2014 (Oandm) Vs. Director, Food Civil Suppl ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-23-2014
UID project of Punjab Government in pursuance of the document dated 08.12.2010 contains an arbitration Clause 8.2. The dispute arose out of the said agreement and notice of arbitration was given by the petitioner on 30.01.2014. Since
Arbitration Case No. 146 of 2013 (Oandm) Vs. M/S Velocity Fitness City ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-28-2014
30.04.2013 on terms and conditions specified therein. This agreement contains an arbitration clause as under:- “That if any dispute arises out of this agreement the same shall be referred to sole arbitrator appointed with the consent of
The Dispute Inter-se the Parties I.E. the Petitioner and Vs. Central A ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-05-2014
Standing Counsel for UOI- Respondents No.2 to 5. None for respondent No.6. **** SANJAY KISHAN KAUL C.J.(Oral) The dispute inter-se the parties i.e. the petitioner and respondent No.6, pertain to the post of Extra Departmental Branch Post
Arbitration Case No. 107 of 2013(Oandm) Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-12-2014
commencing the arbitration proceedings and further setting at naught the very purpose for which the process of alternate dispute resolution through arbitration was adopted. The dispute pertains to a tender invited for Artificers work (repair work for
Arbitration Case No. 131 of 2011 Vs. Sikandar Singh
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Sep-27-2013
appointed within one week from today by inter-se communications through counsels. c) In order to finally resolve the dispute, Shri Sukhdev Kumar Garg, a retired Addl. District & Sessions Judge, # 487-A, Model Town Extension, Ludhiana (Mobile
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free