Dispute - Judgment Search Results
Arbitration Case No. 125 of 2011 Vs. M/S Natt Galary and Another.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
the aforesaid sum have arisen out of franchise agreement dated 15.05.2009 which contains arbitration clause and therefore, the disputes are to be settled through arbitration. That is the reason for filing the present petition.2. The following back
Arbitration Case No. 120 of 2011 Vs. Executive Engineer, Huda Division ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-01-2013
Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short ‘the Act’) praying for appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties in terms of the arbitration agreement between the parties.2. As per the petitioner society, the
Arbitration Case No. 55 of 2012 (Oandm) Vs. M/S Satnam Agri. Products ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
Udham Singh Nagar, Jalandhar be appointed as sole Arbitrator to enter upon the reference and adjudicate upon the disputes between the parties. iv) The fee of the Arbitrator be governed by the High Court Rules. Ordered accordingly.
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Arbitration Case No. 139 of 2012 (Oandm) Vs. Shri Radhey Shyam Mehra_
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the said Act’) seeking reference of the disputes to arbitration in view of the arbitration agreement dated 23.10.2011. The defence taken up by the respondent is
Disputed Godown therefore the Plaintiff Is Entitled to Protect for Vs. ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-08-2013
advance rent for each month will be paid before the 5th of each month. The agreement is not disputed or that it is bipartite. It is also not disputed that the rent was enhanced voluntarily from Rs
Arbitration Case No. 26 of 2009 Vs. M/S Reliance Engineering Associati ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-18-2013
laying on Amritsar-Zira route. The second agreement was for laying the optical fiber cable on Sangrur-Sunam route.2. The disputes have arisen in respect of both the agreements, inasmuch as per the petitioner he has to recover certain
Arbitration Case No. 40 of 2012 (Oandm) Vs. State of Haryana and Other ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-16-2012
respondents for appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the claims of the petitioner herein. There is no dispute that clause 25(A) of the General Conditions of Contract is the arbitration clause. In the reply filed by
Arbitration Case No. 161 of 2011 Vs. State of Haryana and Another
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-16-2012
Act, 1996 (for short 'the Act') for appointment of an independent person as sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties arising out of the contract work as per Agreement No.9 of 2007-08, for constructing a
Arbitration Case No. 143 of 2011 (Oandm) Vs. New India City Developers ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-19-2013
(hereinafter referred to as the ‘said Act’) for termination of the authority of respondent No.2 as Arbitrator.2. The dispute arose out of the Development Agreement dated 03.03.2007 which culminated in filing of Arbitration Case No.22 of 2008.
Arbitration Case No. 158 of 2011 Vs. Haryana State Agricultural Market ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-09-2012
as entering of contract between the parties, which contains arbitration clause as well, is concerned, there is no dispute as the respondents have failed to appoint any Arbitrator inspite of issuance of legal notice. It is not
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free