Disputable - Judgment Search Results
Arbitration Case No. 125 of 2011 Vs. M/S Natt Galary and Another.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
agreement dated 15.05.2009 which contains arbitration clause and therefore, the disputes are to be settled through arbitration. That is the reason
Arbitration Case No. 120 of 2011 Vs. Executive Engineer, Huda Division ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-01-2013
Act’) praying for appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties in terms of the arbitration agreement between
Arbitration Case No. 55 of 2012 (Oandm) Vs. M/S Satnam Agri. Products ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
Arbitrator to enter upon the reference and adjudicate upon the disputes between the parties. iv) The fee of the Arbitrator be
Arbitration Case No. 139 of 2012 (Oandm) Vs. Shri Radhey Shyam Mehra_
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
referred to as ‘the said Act’) seeking reference of the disputes to arbitration in view of the arbitration agreement dated 23.10.2011.
Disputed Godown therefore the Plaintiff Is Entitled to Protect for Vs. ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-08-2013
before the 5th of each month. The agreement is not disputed or that it is bipartite. It is also not disputed
Arbitration Case No. 26 of 2009 Vs. M/S Reliance Engineering Associati ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-18-2013
for laying the optical fiber cable on Sangrur-Sunam route.2. The disputes have arisen in respect of both the agreements, inasmuch as
Arbitration Case No. 40 of 2012 (Oandm) Vs. State of Haryana and Other ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-16-2012
upon the claims of the petitioner herein. There is no dispute that clause 25(A) of the General Conditions of Contract is
Arbitration Case No. 161 of 2011 Vs. State of Haryana and Another
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-16-2012
of an independent person as sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties arising out of the contract work as
Arbitration Case No. 143 of 2011 (Oandm) Vs. New India City Developers ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-19-2013
termination of the authority of respondent No.2 as Arbitrator.2. The dispute arose out of the Development Agreement dated 03.03.2007 which culminated
Arbitration Case No. 158 of 2011 Vs. Haryana State Agricultural Market ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-09-2012
contains arbitration clause as well, is concerned, there is no dispute as the respondents have failed to appoint any Arbitrator inspite
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »