Dispose Of - Judgment Search Results

Vector Surgical Disposables, vs State of Kerala,

Court: Kerala

assessed under the Amnesty Scheme.5. Considering the said stand on behalf ofthe respondents, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to appear before the 2nd respondent on 29.11.2023 and the 2nd

Barmer Disposal Auto-parts Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: (1987)61CTR(Raj)61; [1987]163ITR690(Raj)

M.C. Jain, J. 1. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur Bench, Jaipur, has referred the following question of law for being answered by this court, vide its order dated January 30, 1978 : 'Whether, on the facts...

Favas Yusuf vs the Drug Disposal Committee

Court: Kerala

VALAPATTANAM P.O, KANNUR, PIN - 670010 BY ADVS. LIJIN THAMBAN G.S.KRISHNAN KARTHA AKSHARA K.V. RESPONDENTS: 1 THE DRUG DISPOSAL COMMITTEE (CONSTITUTED UNDER SECTION 52 OF THE NDPS ACT) REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT POLIFE

Favas Yusuf vs the Drug Disposal Committee

Court: Kerala

MANNA, VALAPATTANAM P.O, KANNUR, PIN - 670010 BY ADVS. LIJIN THAMBAN G.S.KRISHNAN KARTHA AKSHARA K.V. RESPONDENTS:1 THE DRUG DISPOSAL COMMITTEE (CONSTITUTED UNDER SECTION 52 OF THE NDPS ACT) REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT POLICE

Nlrb Vs. City Disposal Systems, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

NLRB v. City Disposal Systems, Inc. - 465 U.S. 822 (1984) U.S. Supreme Court NLRB v. City Disposal Systems, Inc., 465 U.S.

Bfi, Inc. Vs. Kelco Disposal, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

BFI, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc. - 492 U.S. 257 (1989) U.S. Supreme Court BFI, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc., 492 U.S. 257

Snohomish County Vs. Seattle Disposal Company

Court: US Supreme Court

SNOHOMISH COUNTY v. SEATTLE DISPOSAL COMPANY - 389 U.S. 1016 (1967) U.S. Supreme Court SNOHOMISH COUNTY v. SEATTLE DISPOSAL COMPANY , 389 U.S.

Delhi Water Supply and Sewage Disposal Undertaking and Another Vs. Sta ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1996IIAD(SC)306; AIR1996SC2992; 1996(1)ALD(Cri)786; 1996CriLJ1887; JT1996(6)SC107; (1996)2SCC572; [1996]3SCR13

order was willfully violated by the contemners. The grievance being common, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.7. The contemners agree that no water at all was released pursuant to the

Delhi Water Supply and Sewage Disposal Committee and ors. Vs. R.K. Kas ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1989SC278; JT1988(4)SC421; (1989)ILLJ171SC; 1988(2)SCALE1390; 1989Supp(1)SCC194; [1988]Supp3SCR633; 1989(1)LC8(SC)

No. 8 of 1978.2. The first appellant in the first appeal is the Delhi Water Supply and Sewage Disposal Undertaking (the 'Undertaking') The appellants in the next appeal are some of the Executive Engineers in the Undertaking.

Director of Supplies and Disposals, Calcutta Vs. Member, Board of Reve ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [1967]3SCR778; [1967]20STC398(SC)

the Government." The Government of India set up an organisation the Directorate of Disposals (United States Transfer Directorate)-to dispose of war equipment taken over by them from the American forces after the Second World War. This Organisation had … that the Government of India paid noconsideration for acquiring the equipment; they merely set up an Organisation to dispose of the equipment. It is not, and cannotbe argued that because the Government of India received theequipment free of