Displayed - Judgment Search Results

B.P.L. Display Devices Workers Union, Through Its Joint Secretary Shri ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: [2006(111)FLR1003]

S.P. Mehrotra, J.1. The present Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed, interalia, praying for quashing the order dated 3.8.2000 (Annexure No. 6 to the Writ Petition), stated to have...

Promenade Retail Display Systems, vs State Tax Officer

Court: Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 3RD AGRAHAYANA, 1943 PETITIONER/S: PROMENADE RETAIL DISPLAY SYSTEMS, GROUND FLOOR, 39/3521, KAUSTHUBHAM, MANIKKATH...

Hotline Wittis Display Devices Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2004)(91)ECC628

1. These are two applications for waiver of pre-deposit of Modvat credit of duty and penalties as under :- 2. Shri B.L. Narasimhan, learned Advocate, submitted that M/s. L.G.Hotline CPT Ltd. manufacture colour picture tube which...

Bpl Display Devices Ltd. Vs. C.C.E.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

1. These two appeals, filed by M/s. B.P.L. Display Devices Ltd., are posted today for hearing the stay applications. However, we take up the appeals themselves for disposal after staying the recovery of the entire customs...

Hotline Wittis Display Devices Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2004)(97)ECC742

1. In these two appeals arising out of a common Order-in-Original the Appellants are challenging disallowance of Modvat Credit and imposition of penalty. Shri A.R. Madhav Rao, learned Advocate, submitted that M/s.Hotline Wittis Display Devices Ltd.,...

Hotline Display Devices Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

1. The applicant is aggrieved by the order of Commissioner (Appeals) made on 29-6-2006 dismissing the appeal on the ground that they had not complied with the Interim Order dated 10-5-2005 and no pre-deposit was made...

Aplab Display Devices and Systems Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex. and Custo ...

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

1. Vide the impugned order the Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune has confirmed short levy of Rs. 21,20,913/- together with interest at the rate of 20% under the provisions of Section 11AB of the Central Excise...

Morgan Securities & Credits Pvt. Ltd. Vs.bpl Display Devices Ltd. & An ...

Court: Delhi

$~5 & 6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:7. h February, 2019 5 + 6 + VIDEOCON INDUSTRIES LTD. O.M.P. 665/2013 & I.A. 14901/2018 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajneesh...

Larsen and Toubro Limited Vs. Prime Displays (P) Ltd.,

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2003(1)ALLMR248; 2002(5)BomCR158; [2003]114CompCas141(Bom)

ORDERD.K. Deshmukh, J.1. The parties are agreed that the facts and law involved in these three company applications are identical and hence all these applications can be conveniently disposed of by a common order.2. The facts...

The Commissioner of Central Vs. Sign and Display Systems

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Reported in: (2006)(110)ECC40

when the respondent manufactures item falling under CH 3919 and undertakes printing on them directly.5. The learned Advocate displayed the samples of the final product produced by the respondents in the court.6. We have gone through the