Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Discussion - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 17 2013

“on the Above Subject the Gram Panchayat Has Discussed Seriously Vs. ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jul-17-2013

by an affidavit. Both the documents are brought on record as Annexures P-1 and P-2. The Gram Panchayat discussed the matter in its meeting and on 21.1.2005, instead of ordering sale of land, exchange was ordered qua


Sep 05 2013

“26. in View of My Above Discussion and Findings Suit of Vs. Vijay K ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Sep-05-2013

Tikhowal, Tehsil Mukerian. The trial court decreed the suit in following terms:- “26. In view of my above discussion and findings, suit of plaintiff for possession of land measuring 1 Kanal and 6 Marlas being western part


Jul 01 2013

“8. from the Aforementioned Discussions It Is Clear That the Vs. Fin ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jul-01-2013

take a decision within 30 days. The relevant observation of the orders read as under:“8. From the aforementioned discussions, it is clear that the petitioner has not been afforded opportunity of hearing under the law. Therefore, the


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 02 2013

“In View of the Above Discussions We Allow the Vs. State of Punjab a ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Sep-02-2013

one common order dated 17.10.1996 and directions in the following terms were issued:- “In view of the above discussions, we allow the writ petitions and direct the respondents to consider the candidature of the petitioners for absorption


Jul 07 2014

“6. Having Regard to the Discussion Made Above Annexure Vs. Tarsem C ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jul-07-2014

of the Tribunal, with which we are in complete agreement, reads as under:- “6. Having regard to the discussion made above, Annexure A-17 dated 1.7.1998 is declared as illegal and against the provisions of letter dated 30.11.1994


Jul 09 2014

“11. in View of What Has Been Discussed Above the Vs. Gurmukh Singh ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jul-09-2014

(supra).(supra) The operative directions are contained in para-11 as under :- “11. In view of what has been discussed above, the OA is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to prepare a seniority list of


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial