Discovers - Judgment Search Results

Vaden Vs. Discover Bank

Court: US Supreme Court

..... that the claim cannot remain in state court there is nothing inappropriate or exceptional discover acknowledges about a state court s entertaining and applying federal law to completely preempted claims ..... litigation has unfolded the majority crafts a rule that produces inconsistent results because discover s debt collection claim was filed before vaden s counterclaims the majority treats the debt .....

Discover India Tour (P) Ltd & Ors. Vs.union of India & Ors.

Court: Delhi

..... new delhi date of judgment 14 h november 2017 w p c no 2912 2016 discover india tour p ltd ors petitioners through mr prateek kohli and ms richa oberoi advocates .....

Discover India Tours (P) Ltd. Vs. Assessing Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in: (2006)104TTJ(Delhi)298

1 this is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the cit a dt 20th dec 2005...

M/S. Discover Prints India Pvt. Vs. M/S. Ashu Chemicals

Court: Delhi

..... court of delhi at new delhi rfa no 756 2002 10th january 2012 m s discover prints india pvt ltd appellant through mr n safaya advocate versus m s ashu chemicals .....

United States Vs. Castillero

Court: US Supreme Court

..... and was so recognized in various judicial proceedings by persons who would certainly have discovered and denounced any forgery which might have been committed and finally the intrinsic improbability ..... consideration of all the circumstances connected with this petition i confess myself unable to discover any sufficient reasons for considering it forged the claimants have also produced a document .....

R (on the Application of Adams) (Fc) (Appellant) Vs. Secretary of Stat ...

Court: UK Supreme Court

..... legal representatives before his trial or available on the holmes database the phrase newly discovered raises a further difficult problem of interpretation for it does not indicate to whom ..... a result of violence but rather of inducements assuming for present purposes that the newly discovered material demonstrated that donnelly had been offered identical inducements to those which macdermott and .....

Sushil Arora vs.state

Court: Delhi

..... interpreting the words so much of such information as relates distinctly to the fact thereby discovered the court held that the word distinctly means directly indubitably strictly or unmistakably the word ..... to the riders of the information being immediate and proximate cause of discovery and the discovered fact being relevant to prove his complicity through confirmation by subsequent events we have .....

Naresh Chandra Das and anr. Vs. Emperor

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1942Cal593

..... 42 the requirements of section 27 are 1 some fact is deposed to a as discovered b discovered in consequence of information c information received from a person accused of any offence ..... because such discovery was facilitated by other assistance as well when a fact is once discovered in consequence of information received from some source any further information subsequently received from any .....

State (N.C.T. of Delhi) Vs. Navjot Sandhu @ Afsan Guru

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2005SC3820; 2005CriLJ3950; 122(2005)DLT194(SC); (2005)11SCC600

..... all the learned counsel for the defence then stressed on the expression thereby discovered which means discovered pursuant to information which he himself supplied countering the argument of the learned ..... of the expression discovery of fact was not considered where a physical object was discovered in consequence of the information furnished which part of that information statement becomes relevant .....

Merck and Co. Vs. Reynolds

Court: US Supreme Court

..... only when a reasonably diligent plaintiff after being put on inquiry notice should have discovered facts constituting violation internal quotation marks omitted we granted merck s petition ii ..... notice standard is superior because determining when a hypothetical reasonably diligent plaintiff would have discover ed the necessary facts is too complicated for judges to undertake but courts applying .....