Disability - Judgment Search Results
Disabled Right Group Vs. Union of India
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-15-2017
pedagogy i.e. making adequate provisions and facilities of teaching for disabled persons, depending upon the nature of their disability, to enable them to undertake their studies effectively. We may state at the outset that though the petition
Federation of Disabled Rights vs.department of Social Welfare, Govt. O ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-09-2018
OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7009/2018 % Date of decision :9. h July, 2018 FEDERATION OF DISABLED RIGHTS ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. K.K. Mishra, Mr. Sanjay Baniwal and Mr. Lal Babu Lalit, Advs. versus
Sanal Kumar (Disabled) vs K.Thangavel
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jan-15-2020
2,000/- Bystander’s expenses 3,000/- Damage to clothing 250/- Diisfiguration 5,000/- Loss of amenities 15,000/- Pain and suffering 25,000/- Disability 64,800/- Treatment expenses 1,41,245/- Total 2,70,295/- is rounded to Rs.2,70,300/-13. The accident occurred on 25.02.2000. At thetime of
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Kerala Public Service Commission vs State Disability Commissioner
Court: Kerala
Decided on: May-05-2023
PETITIONER: KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION PATTAM,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY., PIN - 695004 BY ADV P.C.SASIDHARAN RESPONDENTS:1 STATE DISABILITY COMMISSIONER OFFICE OF THE STATE COMMISSIONER FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES, ANJANEYA, TC 9/1023(1), GROUND FLOOR, SASTHAMANGALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN
Virinder Aggarwal vs.department of Empowerment of Persons With Disabil ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-28-2017
advertisement issued in the newspaper (Annexure - herein) since she is in the category of more than 40% disability.” The petitioner’s daughter, Ms Geetika Aggarwal, was born on 2. 19.08.1985 with a congenital defect as she had
r.r. Pradhan vs.chief Commissioner of Persons With Disabilities & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2017
the Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities, who had rejected his plea that in view of an earlier disability certificate dated 04.03.2009, submitted by him to the respondent No.2, he ought not to have been put through
Ranjit Kumar Gupta vs.chief Commissioner for Persons With Disabilities ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2018
1.... Petitioner had filed a complaint in September, 2016 in the Court of Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disability asserting that petitioner was called for document verification on 12th August, 2016 and this call letter appeared on
Syndicate Bank vs.chief Commissioner for Persons With Disabilities & A ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2018
certain other physically handicapped persons had been accommodated in Delhi. Per contra, the petitioner-Bank, submitted that the physical disability suffered by Respondent No.2 was only to the extent of 7%, and that preference in the matter for
Jaya Kumar K vs the Chief Commissioner for Persons With Disabilities
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-25-2026
He has undergone multiple surgeries thereafter and, according to him, is a high-level (T3 complete) paraplegic with 85% disability.3. Owing to the aforesaid disability, the Petitioner asserts that heencountered several difficulties at his workplace. In this regard,
Indian Association of Clinical Psychologists Kerala Region vs the Stat ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Feb-12-2024
petitioner, which is stated to be the Indian Association of Clinical Psychologists, Kerala region, impugns Ext.P2, wherein, theState Disability Commissioner has recorded that “the IQ assessment by Clinical Psychologists is not mandatory” (sic), for the purpose of
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free