Dis - Judgment Search Results

Roshan Di Hatti Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1977SC1605; [1977]107ITR938(SC); (1977)2SCC378; [1977]3SCR153

of the I.T.O. and on appeal, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner took the view that, on the facts as disclosed by the material placed on record in the proceedings, a much larger allowance should have been made in

Roshan Di Hatti Vs. Commissionr of Income-tax, New Delhi.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [1968]68ITR177(SC)

unauthorised. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner rejected that contention, because in his view there was no evidence to prove disruption of the joint status of the family, and also because the partition set up was partial. The Appellate

Jai Mata Di Enterprises Represented by Radha Kant Singh Vs. Bank of In ...

Court: Jharkhand

construction of RSETI building at Chas, Bokaro. Clause 8 of the agreement reads as under:- “Clause 8:- Any dispute arising under this agreement shall be dealt under arbitration clause of General Conditions of Contract”.3. It is not

Mashaian Di Hatti Ltd. Vs. Hotel Queen Road Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Delhi

2012 [under Order XXXVII Rule 3 (5) CPC by the Defendant seeking leave to defend] 1. This order disposes of three applications filed by the Defendant, Hotel Queen Road Private Limited (HQRPL) under Order XXXVII Rule 3

Mahashian Di Hatti (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1999)(105)ELT589TriDel

logic would apply for its inclusion under this Chapter. On this observation, we uphold the impugned order and dismiss the appeal.

Ma Ween Di Vs. Ma Kin

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1908)10BOMLR41

fact, a repute of marriage. But, in countries where customs are different, it is necessary to be more discriminating, more especially owing to the laxity with which the word 'wife' is used by witnesses in regard to

Di Giovanni Vs. Camden Fire Insurance Assn.

Court: US Supreme Court

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT Syllabus A fire insurance company sued two defendants in the federal district court for the cancellation of two policies, one issued to both defendants, insuring a building, the other issued

Di Santo Vs. Pennsylvania

Court: US Supreme Court

posted in his office. This is in accordance with the Pennsylvania Act of 1863, P.L. 582, regulating the display of certificates by steamship agents, and a copy of that Act was printed on the certificate. The companies

Sushil Kumar and anr Vs. Special Dis. Judge - 1 and ors

Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur

[1].IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER Sushil Kumar & Anr. versus Special District Judge-I, (Pong Dam Oustees Cases).Sr.Ganganagar & OtheRs.S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.383/2014 Under Article 226 & 227 of the Constitution

Harbans Singh and anr. Vs. Madan Di Hatti

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (1991)99PLR550

allowed at the rate of 6% per annual. So ordered. No order as to costs. R. S. A. disposed of. - ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - Government contract: [Vijender Jain, C.J., Rajive Bhalla & Sury Kant, JJ] Government Contract