Dis - Judgment Search Results
Roshan Di Hatti Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-08-1977
Reported in: AIR1977SC1605; [1977]107ITR938(SC); (1977)2SCC378; [1977]3SCR153
Assistant Commissioner took the view that, on the facts as disclosed by the material placed on record in the proceedings, a
Roshan Di Hatti Vs. Commissionr of Income-tax, New Delhi.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-29-1967
Reported in: [1968]68ITR177(SC)
because in his view there was no evidence to prove disruption of the joint status of the family, and also because
Jai Mata Di Enterprises Represented by Radha Kant Singh Vs. Bank of In ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-14-2017
8 of the agreement reads as under:- “Clause 8:- Any dispute arising under this agreement shall be dealt under arbitration clause
Turn these results into brief-ready notes
Mashaian Di Hatti Ltd. Vs. Hotel Queen Road Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
by the Defendant seeking leave to defend] 1. This order disposes of three applications filed by the Defendant, Hotel Queen Road
Mahashian Di Hatti (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Dec-14-1998
Reported in: (1999)(105)ELT589TriDel
Chapter. On this observation, we uphold the impugned order and dismiss the appeal.
Ma Ween Di Vs. Ma Kin
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-06-1907
Reported in: (1908)10BOMLR41
where customs are different, it is necessary to be more discriminating, more especially owing to the laxity with which the word
Di Giovanni Vs. Camden Fire Insurance Assn.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Nov-11-1935
A fire insurance company sued two defendants in the federal district court for the cancellation of two policies, one issued to
Di Santo Vs. Pennsylvania
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-03-1927
with the Pennsylvania Act of 1863, P.L. 582, regulating the display of certificates by steamship agents, and a copy of that
Sushil Kumar and anr Vs. Special Dis. Judge - 1 and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Jan-21-2014
RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER Sushil Kumar & Anr. versus Special District Judge-I, (Pong Dam Oustees Cases).Sr.Ganganagar & OtheRs.S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.383/2014
Harbans Singh and anr. Vs. Madan Di Hatti
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-13-1990
Reported in: (1991)99PLR550
So ordered. No order as to costs. R. S. A. disposed of.
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »
Try AI Brief & Semantic Search — 7 days free