Dharma - Judgment Search Results

Dharma Vs. Nirmal Singh Bittu and Another

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1996IAD(SC)943; AIR1996SC1136; 1996(1)ALD(Cri)204; 1996(2)BLJR1630; 1996CriLJ1631; 1996(1)Crimes83(SC); JT1996(4)SC608; 1996(1)SCALE677; (1996)7SCC471; [1996]2SCR115

examining grand father of Ravinder Jit, who is P.W. 6. Dharma, and who is the person who had approached the High

Dharma and ors. Vs. Roop Ram

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 28(1985)DLT35; 1985(9)DRJ273

was being used as such. ........... (7) In rebuttal Smt. Dharma, one of the petitioners and two witnesses had stated that

Dharma Vs. State

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1975(8)WLN508

P.D. Kudal, J.1. Accused-appellant Dharma has filed this appeal from Tail against the judgment dated

Dharma Vs. the State

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1966CriLJ441

Sirohi, dated the 16th April, 1963, by which the accused Dharma has been convicted under Sections 201 and 411 I. P.

Bhagelu Vs. Dharma and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1924All79; (1923)ILR45All623

harm a .for restitution of conjugal rights, and, as Musammat Dharma was a minor, her uncle Sampat was made guardian ad

Kirpa and ors. Vs. Dharma and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (2006)144PLR613

| | | | | Siri Ram Badlu Hari Tek Dharma Sardara KirpaChand Singh (Defdt.3) Singh Chand Defdt.1) (Defdt.2) (Defdt.5)(Defdt. (Defdt.2

Balmakund and ors. Vs. Dharma and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: (1896)ILR18All458

Banerji, J.1. The suit out of which this appeal has arisen was brought for the redemption of a mortgage, which...

Baba Badri Dass Vs. Dharma and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1982P& H255

The view taken in Trikha's case was relied upon in Dharma v. Smt. Harbi, 1976 Rev LR 641, to hold that

Dharambir @ Dharma Vs. The State Of Haryana

Court: Supreme Court of India

OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1858 OF2009DHARAMBIR @ DHARMA .….Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA ….Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Mehta, J.1. Vide

Dharma @ Dharam Singh . Vs. The State Of Haryana

Court: Supreme Court of India

deceased, unless the said eye witness identifies the accused as Dharma and Parkash, the prosecution cannot establish that the accused who