Dharma - Judgment Search Results

Dharma Vs. Nirmal Singh Bittu and Another

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1996IAD(SC)943; AIR1996SC1136; 1996(1)ALD(Cri)204; 1996(2)BLJR1630; 1996CriLJ1631; 1996(1)Crimes83(SC); JT1996(4)SC608; 1996(1)SCALE677; (1996)7SCC471; [1996]2SCR115

has been met to a great extent by examining grand father of Ravinder Jit, who is P.W. 6. Dharma, and who is the person who had approached the High Court and is the appellant herein. From his

DHARMA Vs State Inspector of Police

Court: Chennai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 06.02.2026CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Dharma ...Petitioner Vs. State: Inspector of Police, Mylapore, Chennai. ...Respondent Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS,

Dharma Vs State rep.by,

Court: Chennai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 12.03.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR1. Dharma2. Perumal ..Petitioners Vs.1. State rep. by The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vellore Sub Division, Vellore District.2. The Inspector

Dharma and ors. Vs. Roop Ram

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 28(1985)DLT35; 1985(9)DRJ273

had been let out for residential purpose and was being used as such. ........... (7) In rebuttal Smt. Dharma, one of the petitioners and two witnesses had stated that the room had been let out for commercial

Dharma Vs. State

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1975(8)WLN508

P.D. Kudal, J.1. Accused-appellant Dharma has filed this appeal from Tail against the judgment dated 31st July, 1971 by the learned Sessions Judge,

Dharma Vs. the State

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1966CriLJ441

of the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Sirohi, dated the 16th April, 1963, by which the accused Dharma has been convicted under Sections 201 and 411 I. P. C. and sentenced to four years' and one

Bhagelu Vs. Dharma and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1924All79; (1923)ILR45All623

follows: Bhagelu brought a suit against Musammat D harm a .for restitution of conjugal rights, and, as Musammat Dharma was a minor, her uncle Sampat was made guardian ad litem. The trial court decreed the suit. An

Kirpa and ors. Vs. Dharma and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (2006)144PLR613

| widow, died issueless| |__________________ _________________________________________| | | | | | | | Siri Ram Badlu Hari Tek Dharma Sardara KirpaChand Singh (Defdt.3) Singh Chand Defdt.1) (Defdt.2) (Defdt.5)(Defdt. (Defdt.2 (Defdt 4 (Defdt.6)1)2. Respondent No. 1 and 2

Balmakund and ors. Vs. Dharma and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: (1896)ILR18All458

Matched in: Parties Balmakund and ors. Vs. Dharma and ors.

Baba Badri Dass Vs. Dharma and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1982P& H255

judgment to draw sustenance for the view taken. The view taken in Trikha's case was relied upon in Dharma v. Smt. Harbi, 1976 Rev LR 641, to hold that an alienation of a dohli was void ab