Devilment - Judgment Search Results

Devilal Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court: Madhya Pradesh

M.Cr.C.No.2850/2013 26.3.2013 Shri M.K.Tripathi, counsel for the applicant. Shri R.K.Kesharwani, PL, for the State. Heard on IA No.7291/2013, an application...

Devilal Vs. State of M.P.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: 2002(84)ECC771; 2002(2)MPHT186; 2002(2)MPLJ301

N.K. Jain, J.1. Accused/appellant Devilal is convicted under Sections 8/18 of the Narcotic Drugs and

Devilal Vs. Kantabai

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: II(2000)DMC238

ORDERA.M. Sapre, J.1. Heard on LA. No. 1171/2000.2. This is an application made by appellant under Section 5 of Limitation...

Devilal Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 2002(1)WLC431; 2003(2)WLN293

priest of the temple of Mataji. He found that appellant Devilal was giving lathi blows on the head of his father

Devilal and ors. Vs. Kishanlal and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: RLW2006(3)Raj2214; 2006(3)WLC61

Prakash Tatia, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.2. The appellants are aggrieved against the dismissal of the suit seeking...

Devilal Vs. Kinkar Narmadaprasad and ors.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1982MP45

ORDERM.L. Malik, J. 1. The question for consideration in this election petition is whethernon-joinder of Ramgir Goswami as a party...

Devilal and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1981WLN(UC)322

M.B. Sharma, J.1. The lands of the petitioner are situated in Chak 1 NGD. An outlet for the aforesaid Chak...

Devilal Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1990WLN(UC)466

M.B. Sharma, J.1. After having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor, in the facts and...

Devilal Vs. Chander Singh

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: AIR1973Raj1; 1972()WLN571

ORDER1. This is a reference by one of us arising out of a revision application filed by the defendant against...

Devilal Vs. Himat Ram and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: AIR1973Raj39

defendants that while entering into a subcontract with the plaintiff-appellant Devilal, the defendant Kanaiyalal acted as an agent for the rest