Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Development Commissioners - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 15 2017

Petitioner Vs. Development Commissioner, Falta Economic Zone and Ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Sep-15-2017

JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE Present : The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Biswanath Somadder. WP959of 2013 Kariwala Industries Limited …..…..Writ Petitioner versus Development Commissioner, Falta Economic Zone & ORS.……..Respondents For the Writ Petitioner : Mr.J.P. Khaitan, Senior Advocate, with Mr.Ashok Bose, … ORIGINAL SIDE Present : The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Biswanath Somadder. WP959of 2013 Kariwala Industries Limited …..…..Writ Petitioner versus Development Commissioner, Falta Economic Zone & ORS.……..Respondents For the Writ Petitioner : Mr.J.P. Khaitan, Senior Advocate, with Mr.Ashok Bose, Mr.Ajay


Jul 01 2015

Development Commissioner Vs. M/S. Cochin Minerals and Rutile Ltd.

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jul-01-2015

IN WP(C).30318/2003 -------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 30318/2003 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED1211-2013 APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS: ------------------------------------------------ 1. DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER COCHIN SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONE, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, CSEZ ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING KAKKANADU.2. UNION OF INDIA … WP(C).30318/2003 -------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 30318/2003 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED1211-2013 APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS: ------------------------------------------------ 1. DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER COCHIN SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONE, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, CSEZ ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING KAKKANADU.2. UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED


Aug 17 2017

Mittal Technopack Private Limited and Anr. Vs. The Development Commiss ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Aug-17-2017

THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Original Side Mittal Technopack Private Limited & Anr. Vs. The Development Commissioner & Ors. For the Petitioners : Mr. Uday Chandra Jha, Advocate Mrs. Maheswari Sharma, Advocate Mrs. Tulika … HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Original Side Mittal Technopack Private Limited & Anr. Vs. The Development Commissioner & Ors. For the Petitioners : Mr. Uday Chandra Jha, Advocate Mrs. Maheswari Sharma, Advocate Mrs. Tulika Roy,


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 23 2026

Shri Yogesh Kumar & Anr. vs Development Commissioner Handloom & Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-23-2026

DELHI + W.P.(C) 1025/2026 & CM APPL. 4991/2026 SHRI YOGESH KUMAR & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Appearance not given.versusDEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER HANDLOOM & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Radhika Bishwajit Dubey, CGSC along with Ms. Gurleen Kaur Waraich and Mr,


Jan 07 2026

East India Drums and Barrels Manufacturing Ltd vs Development Commissi ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-07-2026

had directed the respondents to produce a copy of the communication dated 28.10.2024 issued by the Office of Development Commissioner, MSME, New Delhi along with entire record of documents, on the basis of which the communication dated … Sindwani, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Anuj Agarwala, Mr. Prakash Jha, Mr. Vipul Singh and Ms. Mukti Heliwal, Advocates.versusDEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER MSME & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Chetan Sharma, ASG with Mr. Vikram Jetly, CGSC with Ms. Shreya Jetly,


May 29 2024

Kallarackal Jewellers vs the Development Commissioner

Court: Kerala

Decided on: May-29-2024

CSEZ, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING PARTNER K.O. ANTO. BY ADV SRI.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM RESPONDENTS: 1 THE DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY, ADMINISTRATION OFFICE, KAKKANAD, COCHIN-682 037. 2 UNION OF INDIA … KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING PARTNER K.O. ANTO. BY ADV SRI.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM RESPONDENTS: 1 THE DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY, ADMINISTRATION OFFICE, KAKKANAD, COCHIN-682 037. 2 UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED


May 29 2024

Kallarackals Maharani Gold Super Market vs the Development Commissione ...

Court: Kerala

Decided on: May-29-2024

CSEZ, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING PARTNER K.O. ANTO. BY ADV SRI.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM RESPONDENTS: 1 THE DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY, ADMINISTRATION OFFICE, KAKKANAD, COCHIN-682 037. 2 UNION OF INDIA … KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING PARTNER K.O. ANTO. BY ADV SRI.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM RESPONDENTS: 1 THE DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY, ADMINISTRATION OFFICE, KAKKANAD, COCHIN-682 037. 2 UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED


Mar 24 2026

P.DHANALAKSHMI Vs The Development Commissioner-cum-Secretary to Govern ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-24-2026

of 2026 P.Dhanalakshmi D/o Parthipan, No.4, Pandian Street, Pudhu Nagar, Nainaarmandapam, Mudaliarpet, Puducherry- 605 004 ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Development Commissioner-cum- Secretary to Government, Union Territory Of Puducherry, Goubert Avenue, Beach Road, Puducherry 605 0012. The District Magistrate … 2026 P.Dhanalakshmi D/o Parthipan, No.4, Pandian Street, Pudhu Nagar, Nainaarmandapam, Mudaliarpet, Puducherry- 605 004 ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Development Commissioner-cum- Secretary to Government, Union Territory Of Puducherry, Goubert Avenue, Beach Road, Puducherry 605 0012. The District Magistrate 1st


Nov 20 2003

Latoba Bandu Vs. Deputy Development Commissioner and Superintending En ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Nov-20-2003

Reported in: (2004)IIILLJ27Bom

overdraft bonds, agreements of pawn or pledge and letters of hypothecation executed by farmers for agricultural and land development purposes in favour of all Commercial Bank etc. are entitled to remission of entire duty chargeable under the


Feb 08 2005

Baljit Singh Vs. Joint Development Commissioner and anr.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Feb-08-2005

Reported in: (2005)140PLR89

Mittal, J.1. In this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 30.10.2002, passed by the Joint Development Commissioner, Punjab, exercising the power of Commissioner under the provisions of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, … J.1. In this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 30.10.2002, passed by the Joint Development Commissioner, Punjab, exercising the power of Commissioner under the provisions of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial