Development Commissioners - Judgment Search Results

Petitioner Vs. Development Commissioner, Falta Economic Zone and Ors.

Court: Kolkata

Biswanath Somadder. WP959of 2013 Kariwala Industries Limited ....Writ Petitioner versus Development Commissioner, Falta Economic Zone & ORS...Respondents For the Writ Petitioner Union of India Mr.Bhaskar Prasad Banerjee, Mr.Amitabrata Ray .Advocates for Commissioner of CustoMs.Kolkata. Mr.Alok Kumar Banerjee, Mr.P.K. Das, Mr.Arunabha Sarkar.Advocates for

Development Commissioner Vs. M/S. Cochin Minerals and Rutile Ltd.

Court: Kerala

30318/2003 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED1211-2013 APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS: ------------------------------------------------ 1. DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER COCHIN SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONE, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE GOVERNMENT OF OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED1211-2013 APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS: ------------------------------------------------ 1. DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER COCHIN SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONE, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA,

Assam Fisheries Farms and Industries Ltd. Vs. the Development Commissi ...

Court: Guwahati

are directed against an order, dated 28-5-51, passed by the Development Commissioner, Shillong. The first application purports to be under Article the rules do not confer the power on the Development Commissioner to make a settlement directly by himself unless, of course,

Present: Mr. Jatinder Singla Advocate Vs. Joint Development Commission ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

No.1536 of 1998 -2- Tehsil and District Patiala Versus Joint Development Commissioner Punjab etc...Respondents CWP No.1542 of 1998 Gram Panchayat, Village Village Dhanpuri ....Petitioner Tehsil and District Patiala Versus Joint Development Commissioner Punjab etc...Respondents CWP No.1543 of 1998 Gram Panchayat, Village Dhanpuri

Pariya Gram Panchayat Vs. Development Commissioner

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (2005)2GLR1092

The matter is required to be sent back as the Development Commissioner has not considered the contention of the Panchayat, as these questions are required to be considered by the Development Commissioner after hearing the present petitioner. Considering the aforesaid aspect of

Bilenbarric Steels Limited Vs. Regional Development Commissioner for I ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1991Cal62,95CWN208

'shall be required to register their import contracts with the Development Commissioner' 'within thirty days from the date of entering into of the transaction to which the documents relate. The Development Commissioner may decline registration if, as clearly provided in paragraph 31,

M/s Hospira Health Care India Pvt Ltd, represented by the Deputy Gener ...

Court: Chennai

Ministry of Commerce and Industry are set aside. Consequently, the Development Commissioner, Madras Export Processing Zone, Chennai is directed to grant petitioner reeived a communication dated 28.04.2014 from the Assistant Development Commissioner, MEPZ, Chennai, wherein, it was informed that the third respondent

Punjab Wakf Board Vs. Joint Development Commissioner and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (2008)152PLR777

arise from the impugned order dated 16.3.2006 passed by Joint Development Commissioner.The facts are being taken from C.W.P. No. 12915 of pendency of the appeal, the petitioner shall not be dispossessed.The Commissioner vide order dated March 16, 2006 allowed the appeal of

Mukeshbhai Rajendrabhai Shah Vs. Addl. Development Commissioner and 3 ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (1999)3GLR672

aware about the incident of collection of Rs. 500/- as development charges. He never informed the Octroi Clerk to recover only order dated 5th December 1997 passed by the Additional Development Commissioner in Appeal No. 28/97, confirming the order of the District

Ramjibhai Morarbhai Patel Vs. Additional Development Commissioner and ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (1992)2GLR1204; (1993)2GLR1713

and order, dated 29-12-1990, and said order of the Addl. Development Commissioner is the subject-matter of challenge in these petitions.5. Mr. order, dated 29-12-1990, and said order of the Addl. Development Commissioner is the subject-matter of challenge in these petitions.5. Mr. Kalpesh