Development Commissioners - Judgment Search Results
Petitioner Vs. Development Commissioner, Falta Economic Zone and Ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-15-2017
JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE Present : The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Biswanath Somadder. WP959of 2013 Kariwala Industries Limited …..…..Writ Petitioner versus Development Commissioner, Falta Economic Zone & ORS.……..Respondents For the Writ Petitioner : Mr.J.P. Khaitan, Senior Advocate, with Mr.Ashok Bose, … ORIGINAL SIDE Present : The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Biswanath Somadder. WP959of 2013 Kariwala Industries Limited …..…..Writ Petitioner versus Development Commissioner, Falta Economic Zone & ORS.……..Respondents For the Writ Petitioner : Mr.J.P. Khaitan, Senior Advocate, with Mr.Ashok Bose, Mr.Ajay
Development Commissioner Vs. M/S. Cochin Minerals and Rutile Ltd.
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jul-01-2015
IN WP(C).30318/2003 -------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 30318/2003 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED1211-2013 APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS: ------------------------------------------------ 1. DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER COCHIN SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONE, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, CSEZ ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING KAKKANADU.2. UNION OF INDIA … WP(C).30318/2003 -------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 30318/2003 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED1211-2013 APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS: ------------------------------------------------ 1. DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER COCHIN SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONE, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, CSEZ ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING KAKKANADU.2. UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED
Mittal Technopack Private Limited and Anr. Vs. The Development Commiss ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-17-2017
THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Original Side Mittal Technopack Private Limited & Anr. Vs. The Development Commissioner & Ors. For the Petitioners : Mr. Uday Chandra Jha, Advocate Mrs. Maheswari Sharma, Advocate Mrs. Tulika … HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Original Side Mittal Technopack Private Limited & Anr. Vs. The Development Commissioner & Ors. For the Petitioners : Mr. Uday Chandra Jha, Advocate Mrs. Maheswari Sharma, Advocate Mrs. Tulika Roy,
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Shri Yogesh Kumar & Anr. vs Development Commissioner Handloom & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-23-2026
DELHI + W.P.(C) 1025/2026 & CM APPL. 4991/2026 SHRI YOGESH KUMAR & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Appearance not given.versusDEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER HANDLOOM & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Radhika Bishwajit Dubey, CGSC along with Ms. Gurleen Kaur Waraich and Mr,
East India Drums and Barrels Manufacturing Ltd vs Development Commissi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2026
had directed the respondents to produce a copy of the communication dated 28.10.2024 issued by the Office of Development Commissioner, MSME, New Delhi along with entire record of documents, on the basis of which the communication dated … Sindwani, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Anuj Agarwala, Mr. Prakash Jha, Mr. Vipul Singh and Ms. Mukti Heliwal, Advocates.versusDEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER MSME & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Chetan Sharma, ASG with Mr. Vikram Jetly, CGSC with Ms. Shreya Jetly,
Kallarackal Jewellers vs the Development Commissioner
Court: Kerala
Decided on: May-29-2024
CSEZ, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING PARTNER K.O. ANTO. BY ADV SRI.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM RESPONDENTS: 1 THE DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY, ADMINISTRATION OFFICE, KAKKANAD, COCHIN-682 037. 2 UNION OF INDIA … KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING PARTNER K.O. ANTO. BY ADV SRI.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM RESPONDENTS: 1 THE DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY, ADMINISTRATION OFFICE, KAKKANAD, COCHIN-682 037. 2 UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED
Kallarackals Maharani Gold Super Market vs the Development Commissione ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: May-29-2024
CSEZ, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING PARTNER K.O. ANTO. BY ADV SRI.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM RESPONDENTS: 1 THE DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY, ADMINISTRATION OFFICE, KAKKANAD, COCHIN-682 037. 2 UNION OF INDIA … KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING PARTNER K.O. ANTO. BY ADV SRI.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM RESPONDENTS: 1 THE DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY, ADMINISTRATION OFFICE, KAKKANAD, COCHIN-682 037. 2 UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED
P.DHANALAKSHMI Vs The Development Commissioner-cum-Secretary to Govern ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-24-2026
of 2026 P.Dhanalakshmi D/o Parthipan, No.4, Pandian Street, Pudhu Nagar, Nainaarmandapam, Mudaliarpet, Puducherry- 605 004 ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Development Commissioner-cum- Secretary to Government, Union Territory Of Puducherry, Goubert Avenue, Beach Road, Puducherry 605 0012. The District Magistrate … 2026 P.Dhanalakshmi D/o Parthipan, No.4, Pandian Street, Pudhu Nagar, Nainaarmandapam, Mudaliarpet, Puducherry- 605 004 ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Development Commissioner-cum- Secretary to Government, Union Territory Of Puducherry, Goubert Avenue, Beach Road, Puducherry 605 0012. The District Magistrate 1st
Latoba Bandu Vs. Deputy Development Commissioner and Superintending En ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-20-2003
Reported in: (2004)IIILLJ27Bom
overdraft bonds, agreements of pawn or pledge and letters of hypothecation executed by farmers for agricultural and land development purposes in favour of all Commercial Bank etc. are entitled to remission of entire duty chargeable under the
Baljit Singh Vs. Joint Development Commissioner and anr.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-08-2005
Reported in: (2005)140PLR89
Mittal, J.1. In this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 30.10.2002, passed by the Joint Development Commissioner, Punjab, exercising the power of Commissioner under the provisions of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, … J.1. In this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 30.10.2002, passed by the Joint Development Commissioner, Punjab, exercising the power of Commissioner under the provisions of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free