Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Dev - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 11 2003

Dev Vs. Chief Secretary, Government of Kerala

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jul-11-2003

Reported in: AIR2004Ker11; 2003(3)KLT201

a co-plaintiff to the suit.' 16. In the decision reported in (1963) 65 Punjab Law Reporter 618 (Shila Devi v. Mohan Lal) a Division Bench of the Punjab High Court has observed as follows: 'The provisions of


Oct 18 1954

Satya Dev Bushahri Vs. Padam Dev and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Oct-18-1954

Reported in: AIR1955SC5; (1954)IIMLJ439(SC); [1955]1SCR561

Matched in: Parties Satya Dev Bushahri Vs. Padam Dev and ors.


May 25 1954

Satya Dev Bushahri Vs. Padam Dev and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: May-25-1954

Reported in: AIR1954SC587; [1955]1SCR549

only two of them are material for the purpose of the present appeal : (1) that Sri Padam Dev was interested in contracts for the supply of Ayurvedic medicines to the Government, and was therefore disqualified for


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 24 2025

Shri. Viramal Dev Bastwad Mahal Trust vs Shri. Viramal Dev Trust Commi ...

Court: Karnataka Dharwad

Decided on: Nov-24-2025

NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 103556 OF 2024 (GM-R/C) BETWEEN:1. SHRI. VIRAMAL DEV BASTWAD MAHAL TRUSTTQ. RAIBAG,DIST. BELAGAVI, BY ITS HEREDITARY TRUSTEE, SHRI. MADAPPA S/O. SIDRAM VADEYAR, AGE. 50 YEARS, OCC.


Jan 05 2000

Subhash Mohan Dev Vs. Santosh Mohan Dev and ors.

Court: Guwahati

Decided on: Jan-05-2000

submitted that if the unsecured amount of Rs. 54,66,700 together with interest is repaid to M/s. S M Dev & Associates from the capital of the Company it will affect the credibility and interest of the company


Jan 05 2000

Subhash Mohan Dev Vs. Santosh Mohan Dev and ors.

Court: Guwahati

Decided on: Jan-05-2000

Reported in: [2001]104CompCas404(Gauhati)

submitted that if the unsecured amount of Rs. 54,66,700 together with interest is repaid to M/s. S M Dev & Associates from the capital of the Company it will affect the credibility and interest of the company


Sep 27 2013

Tamilnadu Rural Dev.Eng.Asso. Vs. Secretary to Govt.Rural Dev.Dept.and ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-27-2013

APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.8758 OF 2013 (Arising out of SLP (C.) No.20986 of 2007) Tamil Nadu Rural Development Engineers Association …Appellant VERSUS The Secretary to Government Rural Development Department & Ors. …Respondents WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.8759


Apr 29 1993

Guru Nanak Dev University Vs. Parminder Kr. Bansal and Anotherandguru ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Apr-29-1993

Reported in: AIR1993SC2412; (1993)4SCC401

1. Special leave granted. 2. Guru Nanak Dev University is aggrieved by the orders dated 17th August, 1992 of the High Court in Civil Writ Petitions


Aug 27 1999

State of Jandk and anr. Vs. Dev Dutt Pandit

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-27-1999

Reported in: AIR1999SC3196; JT1999(6)SC283; (2000)1MLJ28(SC); 1999(5)SCALE241; (1999)7SCC339; [1999]Supp2SCR1

two claims from the award and also reduced the rate of interest. The award was in favour of Dev Dutt Pandit, the Contractor. He is aggrieved by deletion of two claims and also lowering the rate of


Jun 21 2007

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Sat Dev Prakash

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jun-21-2007

Reported in: AIR2007Bom179; 2007(5)ALLMR272; 2007(5)MhLj570

respective contentions. According to the claimants, the compensation was required to be enhanced as the area was a developed area and the acquired land was adjoining road as well as Konkan Railway was constructing tracks, which would


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial