Determine - Judgment Search Results

Gangadhar (Dead) by L.Rs. Vs. Surplus Land Determination Tribunal and ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1991SC1181; JT1991(5)SC124; 1991(1)SCALE106; (1991)1SCC631; 1991(1)LC476(SC)

of a proceeding under the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961. The Surplus Land Determination Tribunal determined the holding of the appelant, Gangadhar since dead, as of 142 acre and 3 gunthas and accordingly declared

Cr.Misc. M 31484 of 2012 Vs. Determined During the Course of Trial.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

favour of Avtar Singh on account of any dubious conduct of respondents 2 and 3, is to be determined during the couRs.of trial. Respondents 2 and 3 prima facie do not seem to have misused their liberty.

Namdeo Shripat More Since Deceased Through Lrs. Manikrao Namdevrao Mor ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2004(2)MhLj1041

Nashik in the year, 1987 will cause interference in the settled position of the rights of the parties determined by the S.L.D.T. in the year, 1976. In view of the facts of the case and in absence

Fatima W/O Kasam Saheb Bagwan Since Deceased (Through L.Rs. Abdul Kasa ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2009(3)BomCR532; 2009(111)BomLR2022; 2010(1)MhLj142

Writ Petition No. 760 of 1990 was resident of village Massa-Khandeshwari, Taluka Kallam, District Osmanabad. The Surplus Land Determination Tribunal, Kallam (hereinafter referred to as, 'the S.L.D.T., Kallam') held inquiry. By decision dated 13.4.1976 the S.L.D.T., Kallam

Velammal Matriculation Hir. Secondary School, Rep. by Its Corresponden ...

Court: Chennai

impugned order regarding the existing fee and the fee proposed by the School, which mistake affecting the fee determined by the Committee, thereby leaving huge deficit. 10. Learned counsel for Writ Petitioners submitted that these Writ Petitions

Vanavani Matriculation Higher Secondary School, Represented by Its Sec ...

Court: Chennai

unaided private school has filed this writ petition challenging the order dated 03.06.2011 passed by Private School Fee Determination Committee on the ground of arbitrariness and that it is not in conformity with Tamil Nadu Schools (Regulation

Akilandeswari Vidyalaya, Rep. by Its Correspondent and Another Vs. the ...

Court: Chennai

It is the contention of the writ petitioner that earlier they have filed objection before the School Fee Determination Committee mainly challenging the applicability of the Act to CBSE Schools and not on merits. In view of

A.M.M.Foundation Vs. the Secretary, Private School Fee Determination C ...

Court: Chennai

quash the same and all consequential proceedings.) R. BANUMATHI, J. Challenging the order passed by Private School Fee Determination Committee that it is not in conformity with Tamil Nadu Schools (Regulation of Collection of Fee) Act, 2009

Grace Matriculation School Vs. Private Schools Fee Determination Commi ...

Court: Chennai

to fill up the questionnaire and submit to the Committee and in the normal course, the Committee will determine the fee by taking into consideration the relevant aspects and therefore, it is not necessary to remit the

Kavi Bharathi Vidyalaya Vs. Spl.Officer of Private Schools Fees Determ ...

Court: Chennai

validity of the Act 22 of 2009 and the power of the Private Schools Fee Determination Committee to determine the fee for CBSE and ICSE schools. The Committee is empowered to fix/determine the fee to be collected