Detergent - Judgment Search Results

Detergents India Ltd., Shaw Vs. Cce and Detergents India Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (2003)(88)ECC165

in each other's business like (a) no independent company like Detergents India Ltd. would allow its staff to be rotated to

Cce and Advance Detergent Ltd. Vs. Advance Detergent Ltd. and Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (2005)(100)ECC561

1. M/s. Advance Detergents Ltd., (assessee) were engaged in the manufacture of Linear Alkyl

Ecof Detergents (P.) Ltd. Vs. Commercial Tax Officer and anr.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2002)1MLJ174; [2004]138STC367(Mad)

came to be included in the entry, was regarded as detergent powder 'continuously from August 1, 1968 till 1991 for a

Hindustan Detergent Corporation and anr. Vs. West Bengal Small Industr ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR2005Cal129,(2005)1CALLT29(HC)

published by the Bureau of Indian Standard concerning household laundry detergent powders, which prescribes general precaution, the scale of sampling and

Soore Detergents, by Proprietor Vs. D. Mohanraj and anr.

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR2004KAR4325

to whether the prima fade case of passing off the detergent cake marketed by the defendant in the name of the

Swadeshi Detergents Ltd. and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

and could not be given immediately; that PGI/PGHP are purchasing detergent bars from GSL on outright purchase basis. He was shown

Sabena Detergents Pvt. Ltd. and Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

the goods cleared by M/s. Alpha Detergents to M/s. Sabena Detergents during the above period and raised a differential duty. It

Poonam Detergent Industries Vs. Kanpur Trading Company Ltd.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2004(28)PTC161(All)

learned Counsel for the appellant is that the name of Detergent Powder of the appellant is 'Pooja No. 1 Ghari' while

Kothari Detergents (P) Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1998)(61)ECC507

price lists after disallowing deduction of the value of 8 detergent cakes. He also directed duty to be paid on this

Jaina Detergent P. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1999)LC115Tri(Delhi)

Addl. Collector demanded the duty in respect of clearance of detergent affixed with their brand name, which was confirmed by the