Detailed - Judgment Search Results
The Ao Was Dissatisfied with the Details of the Services Vs. M/S Idicu ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-11-2014
while going through the paper books.16. The revenue contends that the assessee had not only failed to furnish details with regard to services rendered by the named persons but had also nowhere mentioned about 'reasonableness' of the
Present:- Mr. Surinder Garg Advocate for Vs. Jai Ganesh Etc. the Detai ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-23-2014
para No.1 of the plaint in the year 1998. In accordance with the aforesaid partition, the house as detailed in para No.1(a) of the plaint was allotted to defendant-respondents No.2 and 3 in equal shares whereas the
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free