Designated Authority - Judgment Search Results
The Designated Authority Vs. M/S the Andhra Petrochemicals Limited
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-01-2020
COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 3046-3048_OF2020(Arising out of SLP (C) NO(S). 22582-22584 OF2019 THE DESIGNATED AUTHORITY & ORS. ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS M/S THE ANDHRA PETROCHEMICALS LIMITED ...RESPONDENT(S) S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.JUDGMENT1 Leave granted. With consent, … respectively. These were in the context of the respondent/writ petitioners’ (hereafter “Andhra Petro”) challenge to orders of the Designated Authority (hereafter “DA”), which related to the question of imposition of anti-dumping duty.2. The facts are that Andhra Petro
Designated Authority, Ministry of Commerce and Industry and anr. Vs. I ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-27-2009
Reported in: 2009(234)ELT386(SC); 2009(1)SCALE68; (2009)2SCC510
(hereinafter referred to as the 'Rules').2. The writ petition was allowed primarily relying on Reliance Industries Ltd. v. Designated Authority and Ors. : 2006(202)ELT23(SC) and the interpretation placed on Section 9A(5) of the Act in the matter and … scope of Section 9A(5) of the Act as considered by this Court in Rishiroop Polymers (P) Ltd. v. Designated Authority and Ors. : 2006(196)ELT385(SC) .3. It is submitted by learned Counsel for the appellant that the issues are
Designated Authority, Ministry of Commerce Vs. Lubrizon (India) Pvt. L ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-10-2008
Reported in: 2008(231)ELT206(SC)
Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995. A Preliminary Finding was given on 29th July, 2002 pursuant to which the Designated Authority issued Preliminary Notification on 5th September, 2002. The Final Finding was given by the Designated Authority on 29th … which the Designated Authority issued Preliminary Notification on 5th September, 2002. The Final Finding was given by the Designated Authority on 29th July, 2003 and, ultimately, in terms of the said Final Findings, Final Notification came to be
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Designated Authority Vs. Indian Refractory Makers' Assocn.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-05-2003
Reported in: 2003(88)ECC1; 2003(154)ELT349(SC); (2003)11SCC28
anti-dumping duty can serve no purpose. Without going into the merits of this controversy, we direct that the Designated Authority may consider the factual position and assess whether the closure of the factory of Birla Periclase factory (which … of fused magnesia or not and whether the closure was subsequent to the investigation or prior thereto. The Designated Authority will also consider whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the continuation of anti-dumping duty is
Designated Authority Anti-dumping Directorate Ministry of Commerce Vs. ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-20-2000
Reported in: AIR2000SC2556; 2000(70)ECC657; 2000(120)ELT11(SC); JT2000(8)SC120; 2000(5)SCALE239; (2000)6SCC626
in Civil Appeal No. _____of 2000 (arising out of S.L.P.(C) No. 5361/2000) had filed a petition before the Designated Authority (Anti-Dumping) Ministry of Commerce (for shor the 'Authority') alleging that M/s. Haldor Topsoe A/S (to be referred to … foundation, the Tribunal held that under Clause (C) of Section 9A(1), there were following three options before the Designated Authority:(i) finding out the comparable price for the like article in the ordinary course of trade when meant for
Aiigma Vs. Designated Authority
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Feb-09-2000
Reported in: (2000)(119)ELT333TriDel
1. These appeals arise out of Final Findings reached by the Designated Authority in the Antidumping investigation concerning import of calcium carbide from the People's Republic of China and Romania. The … the learned Counsel representing the appellants were two-fold. The first one was that domestic industry which moved the Designated Authority for initiating proceedings had no locus. The second argument was that the imports of calcium carbide from China
Steel Authority of India Ltd Vs. Designated Authority, Directorate Gen ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-17-2017
THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.241 OF2017STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. ...APPELLANT VERSUS DESIGNATED AUTHORITY, DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF ANTI-DUMPING & ALLIED DUTIES & Ors. ...RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT RANJAN GOGOI, J.1. Order on the admission … gets imported from China. Against such imports from China, on the basis of the final report of the Designated Authority acting under the Anti Dumping Rules, namely, the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-Dumping Duty on
S and S. Enterprise Vs. Designated Authority and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-22-2005
Reported in: 2005(99)ECC7; 2005(181)ELT375(SC); JT2005(3)SC457; (2005)3SCC337
of the total imports of such batteries into India during that period. This was so found by the Designated Authority (the respondent No.1), on an investigation consequent upon a complaint lodged by the private respondent under Rule 5 … Determination of Injuries) Rules 1995 (referred to as 'the Rules').2. Rule 14(d) inter alia provides that if the Designated Authority determines that the volume of the dumped imports actual or potential from a particular country accounts for less
Sterlite Industries (India) Ltd. Vs. Designated Authority
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-25-2003
Reported in: 2004(92)ECC324; 2003LC1018(SC); 2003(158)ELT673(SC)
2000.2. Briefly stated the facts are as follows :-M/s. Sterlite Industries (India) Limited made a complaint to the Designated Authority that optical fibre were being dumped in India. On the basis of that complaint inquiry was conducted. The … that optical fibre were being dumped in India. On the basis of that complaint inquiry was conducted. The Designated Authority proposed levy of anti-dumping duty. Pursuant to that, Notification dated 28th June, 2000 bearing No. 94/2000-Customs came to
Rishiroop Polymers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Designated Authority and Additional S ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-23-2006
Reported in: 2006(196)ELT385(SC); JT2006(4)SC78; 2006(3)SCALE477; (2006)4SCC303
appeal is regarding the existence, degree and effect of any dumping in relation to any article by the designated authority from time to time.9. In exercise of the power under the Tariff Act, the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment … of the Government of India or such other person which the Government of India may think fit as designated authority for the purpose of said Rules. Under Rule 4, it is the duty of the designated authority to
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free