Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Describable - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 26 1938

Nama Nagayya Vs. Kalle Narasayya Described as Kalle Narasimhayya in Re ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-26-1938

Reported in: AIR1938Mad853; (1938)2MLJ501

we are called upon to consider the question whether an acknowledgment of a debt made by a person described as de facto guardian of a minor would keep the debt alive against the minor which would otherwise


Aug 07 2012

Smt.Alka Thavre(Wrongly Described in the Order as Vs. the State of Mad ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Aug-07-2012

7.8.2012 Shri Brijesh Choubey, Advocate for the applicants. Shri Prakash Gupta, PL for the State. Heard finally with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. This is the fiRs.bail application filed by the applicants...


Dec 05 1958

V. Errabhadrarao (Wrongly Described as Veerabhadrayya in Decree) and a ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Dec-05-1958

Reported in: AIR1960AP415

Jaganmohan Reddy, J. 1. This appeal arises out of a judgment of the City Civil Court decreeing the plaintiffs suit for Rs. 8,250/ with costs against defendants 1 to 3 and directing a permanent injunction restraining...


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 03 1942

P. Sankara Rao, (Wrongly Described as D. Sankara Rao) Vs. Modepalli Ba ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jul-03-1942

Reported in: AIR1942Mad734; (1942)2MLJ520

Krishnaswami Ayyangar, J.1. The 2nd defendant is the appellant. His father who was the 1st defendant in the suit had executed a mortgage in favour of the respondent for Rs. 4,000 on 28th February, 1930. He...


Nov 06 1936

Boodapati Ankamma, Wrongly Described as Nannuru Ankamma in the Decree ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Nov-06-1936

Reported in: (1937)1MLJ192

of festivities, etc., are invalidating circumstances, is putting the matter too high. At best, they can only be described as suspicious circumstances having an important bearing on the question of fact. But in paragraph 6, the lower


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial