Depositories Act 1996 22 Of 1996 Section 19f - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: depositories act 1996 22 of 1996 section 19f Sorted by: recent Court: delhi Page 1 of about 361 results (1.776 seconds)Arti Devi vs.jawaharlal Nehru University
Court : Delhi
indulge in such act in future because this kind of act by any of the complainants defendants and witnesses damages the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMahmood Asad Madani vs.central Bureau of Investigation
Court : Delhi
the whistle blowers protection act 2011 states as under no action shall be taken on public interest disclosures by the competent mrs renu bala pradhan this court in crl m c 2251 2017 vide order dated 18 07 2017 directed the trial 467 468 471 ipc and section 13 2 read with section 13 1 d of the prevention of corruption act crl
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMonu Kapoor vs.directorate of Revenue Intelligence
Court : Delhi
on is untenable in view of amendment of the customs act which included section 28 7a in the customs act that of the hon ble high court on bail application no 224 2016 titled sanjay kumar bhartiya vs dri and inderjeet nagpal power to record the statements of the petitioner pursuant to section 108 of the customs act as once the show cause
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRitesh Soni vs.union of India and Ors.
Court : Delhi
2017 a charge sheet under section 34 a of bsf act 1968 was issued to the petitioner the charge against him in banwari lal yadav supra by drawing attention to para 22 thereof which reads as under 22 the object and intent by a criminal court or has been dealt with under section 53 or section 55 section 75 consequently imposes a bar
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIsni Electric Power Company Pvt. Ltd. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Court : Delhi
have been placed on record this court is satisfied that acting on the above statement of the minister made on the state of bihar v kalyanpur cement limited 2010 3 scc274 22 having examined the said decision in some detail the court
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTr.s. Misra vs.the Union of India & Anr.
Court : Delhi
under article 81 b of the education code as his actual date of retirement on superannuation was 31st january 2006 with the post of vice principal with effect from 16th may 1996 by way of a memorandum dated 16th july 2016 with was allowed by the supreme court by its judgment dated 22nd august 2012 in r s misra v union of india 5th november 2003 an order was passed by the vigilance section of the kvs noting that it had been brought to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHemant Kumar Singhal vs.indian Overseas Bank & Anr
Court : Delhi
is a general issue that there is no cause of action the bank has to first discharge the onus that the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDeepika vs.union Public Service Commission
Court : Delhi
we are disposed to exercising our extraordinary jurisdiction under article 226 of the constitution of india in the petitioner s favour
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMr. Sunil Sethi vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court : Delhi
legal heir as specified in schedule to the hindu succession act 1956 it is the petitioner s case that his parents for overhead tanks utilities for ground floor on terrace proportionate 22 5 undivided impartible ownership rights admeasuring 600 sq yds in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSubhash Gulati vs.harish Kumar Sethi
Court : Delhi
controller to dispose of the application of the petitioner under section 151 cpc and to hear the parties and decide the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT