Depositories Act 1996 22 Of 1996 Section 19f - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: depositories act 1996 22 of 1996 section 19f Page 1 of about 614 results (2.722 seconds)Pushpanjali Tie Up Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Renudevi Choudhary and Others
Court : Mumbai
act sebi made the securities and exchange board of india depositories and participants regulations 1996 regulation 38 1 e requires the in a manner otherwise than as required by the depositories act he must however in any event also create the pledge be created in the manner prescribed by the depositories act 1996 and the regulations made thereunder in other words if the in the price of the flexituff shares dropping from rs 220 to rs 171 per share on 29th october 2013 itself 12 and 28 securities and exchange board of india act section 3 and 12 1 a respondent nos 1 and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJry Investments Private Limited Vs. Deccan Leafine Services Ltd. and o ...
Court : Mumbai
Reported in : [2004]121CompCas12(Bom); [2004]56SCL339(Bom)
shares instead of creating a pledge in accordance with the depositories act 1954 1scr391 in paragraph 10 the supreme court observed instead of creating a pledge in accordance with the depositories act 1954 1scr391 in paragraph 10 the supreme court observed as form in accordance with section 9 of the depositories act 1996 the submission in brief is that when securities are held in accordance with the provisions of the depositories act 1996 22 in the present case it is an admitted fact by shares are held in a fungible form in accordance with section 9 of the depositories act 1996 the submission in brief
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAnis Ur Rehman vs.mohd. Tahir and Ors
Court : Delhi
owner under sub section 1 of section 10 of the depositories act 1996 ii participant as an agent of a depository transactions as prescribed in section 2 9 of the amended act 8 in view of the aforesaid discussion i cannot agree sub section 1 of section 10 of the depositories act 1996 ii participant as an agent of a depository explanation the an agent of a depository under the depositories act 1996 22 of 1996 and any other person as may be notified plaintiff would be maintainable by the third exception contained in section 2 9 of the amended act and that whether or
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSecurities Exchange Board Of India Vs. Franklin Templeton Trustees Ser ...
Court : Karnataka
1956 42 of 1956 or section 19 ia of the depositories act 1996 22 of 1996 as the case may be one hand the unit holders have strong objection to the actions of the trustees and amc and on the other hand same were brought into force with effect from 9th december 1996 and thereafter several amendments thereto have been made from time the delhi high court in the case of m s 22 2001 1 scc29823 2012 12 scc33124 2015 3 scc25180 narinder conferred with the vast powers as set out in sub section 3 onwards of section 11c there are various penal provisions
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnion Of India Vs. M/s. Ganpati Dealcom Pvt. Ltd. Tthrough Managing Di ...
Court : Supreme Court of India
a participant as an agent of a depository under the depositories act 1996 22 of 1996 and any other person as of the above discussion it is manifest that the 2016 act contemplates an in rem forfeiture wherein the taint of entering of a depository under the depositories act 1996 22 of 1996 and any other person as may be notified by the a penalty within the meaning of art 20 1 17 22 in divisional forest officer v g v sudhakar rao 1985 as at the relevant time when such defence was allowed section 4 2 was out 41 of the picture section 4
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSangita Mundhra vs.madhurica Mundhra
Court : Delhi
8 participant as an agent of a depository under the depositories act 1996 22 of 1996 and any other person as rent cs os 343 2017 page 1 of 7 control act 1958 it is also stated that in a suit filed as an agent of a depository under the depositories act 1996 22 of 1996 and any other person as may be an agent of a depository under the depositories act 1996 22 of 1996 and any other person as may be notified perhaps arise for return of the loan 7 even otherwise section 2 9 of the benami transaction prohibition act 2016 reads
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRaman Jain vs.magan Mala Jain & Ors.
Court : Delhi
a participant as an agent of a depository under the depositories act 1996 22 of 1996 and any other person as participant as an agent of a depository under the depositories act 1996 22 of 1996 and any other person as may of a depository under the depositories act 1996 22 of 1996 and any other person as may be notified by the an agent of a depository under the depositories act 1996 22 of 1996 and any other person as may be notified a benami transaction and the same is the provision of section 2 9 of the amended act in the present case
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Commissioner of Income-tax. Vs. Shri Bharat R. RuiA.
Court : Mumbai
board of india act 1992 15 of 1992 or the depositories act 1996 22 of 1996 and the rules regulations or the fact that the futures contracts are settled otherwise than actual delivery cannot be a ground to hold that the futures 15 of 1992 or the depositories act 1996 22 of 1996 and the rules regulations or bye laws made or directions expression securities was extended to include derivatives with effect from 22 2 2000 and the expression derivative was defined by inserting under the 1956 act with effect from 22 2 2000 section 18a inserted in the 1956 act with effect from 22
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBalram Garg Vs. Securities And Exchange Board Of India
Court : Supreme Court of India
securities contracts regulation act 25 1956 42 of 1956 the depositories act 1996 22 of 1996 or the companies act 2013 the pit regulations and section 12a c of the sebi act by communicating the upsi to the appellants in c a regulation act 25 1956 42 of 1956 the depositories act 1996 22 of 1996 or the companies act 2013 18 of 04 2018 to 24 04 2018 phase ii period from 22 06 2018 to 06 07 2018 and phase iii period contravention of the regulations made under this act emphasis supplied section 15g of the securities and exchange board of india act
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi-iv Vs. Dlf Commercial Developers ...
Court : Delhi
securities and exchange board of india act 1992 or the depositories act 1996 22 of 1996 and the rules regulations or upon an amended section 43 4 of the income tax act by the impugned order is erroneous it is highlighted in india act 1992 or the depositories act 1996 22 of 1996 and the rules regulations or bye laws made or directions board of india act 1992 or the depositories act 1996 22 of 1996 and the rules regulations or bye laws made derivatives only for a limited purpose on the other hand section 73 has wider application and relates to all manner of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT