Depositories Act 1996 22 Of 1996 Section 19f - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: depositories act 1996 22 of 1996 section 19f Sorted by: recent Page 1 of about 605 results (3.636 seconds)Muthoot Finance Limited Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Court : Karnataka
30 12 2024 and quash the same and all consequential actions taken against the petitioner thereafter interest of justice and equity 454 of the earlier code of criminal procedure and now section 500 of the bnss were to be filed of course
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/s H M Infra Tech Pvt Ltd Vs. H M Tamborine Apartments Owners Associa ...
Court : Karnataka
taken note of sections 14 71 and 79 of rera act when the relief is sought only for permanent injunction and and the same was confirmed by this court vide order 22 04 2017 and vacated the interim order of status quo of and instead of that elaborate discussion was made regarding sections 14 71 and 79 of rera act defence of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/s. Lancer Finance Vs. The Competent Authority
Court : Karnataka
competent authority under andhra pradesh protection depositors of financial establishment act 1999 represented by its public prosecutor reported in 2015 scc under section 9 of the kpidfe act by order dated 22 07 2017 and the said order has attained its finality was also withdrawn 5 the trial court issued notice under section 12 1 of the kpidfe act the respondent no 1
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr Mohankumar M Vs. State Of Karnataka
Court : Karnataka
no 81 it is held that the high court has acted completely beyond the settled parameters as discussed above which govern wherein discussion was made with regard to scope of sections 227 228 239 and 240 of cr p c in paragraph is barred as for example the remedy by way of section 115 of the code of civil procedure 1908 this court
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBrindavan Hydropower Private Limited Vs. Union Of India
Court : Karnataka
2023 wp no 23729 of 2023 and 12 other cases act also requires the regulatory commissions to ensure transparency in exercise 53048 wp no 11235 of 2024 c w wp no 22770 of 2023 wp no 23729 of 2023 and 12 other are to be as specified by the appropriate commission 92 section 40 1 of the act specifically states that it would
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri. Chennakeshava Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Court : Karnataka
that 20 bmtf is empowered to enquire into the said acts also in paragraph no 8 also made clear that bmtf special acts mentioned in g o no udd247mnu95dated 19 03 1996 and those mentioned above read with or without those relevant special leave petition criminal dairy no s 3629 2019 dated 22 02 2019 so also order passed in bangalore metropolitan task grabbing as enumerated under sub sections a to d of section 5 taking cognizance of the offence under sections 420 and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMs. X Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Court : Karnataka
definition of transgender in section 2 k of the transgender act and in order to give due effect to the rights proof of recognition of his identity as a transgender person 22 rule 3 of the transgender rules is reproduced hereunder for perceived gender identity in terms of sub section 2 of section 4 17 a person when born and the birth certificate
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMr. Gaurav K Bhandari Vs. Mr. Bharath Chandrashekhar
Court : Karnataka
any reliefs other than that provided under the a c act 12 5 interlocutory orders could be passed ad interim or proceeding under section 9 of the arbitration and conciliation act 1996 a c act for short for appointment of a receiver thereof 2 where a caveat has been lodged under sub section 1 the person by whom the caveat has been lodged
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/s Asset Reconstruction Company (india) Limited Vs. The Senior Sub Re ...
Court : Karnataka
under several articles of the schedule to the karnataka stamp act 1957 before doing so the said senior sub registrar has property relating to sridevi of which he was the promoter 22 4 the cancellation of documents executed in relation to the sarfaesi act the petitioner is also a financial institution under section 2 h ia of recovery of debts due to banks
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBowring Institute Vs. Mr. Sarwik S
Court : Karnataka
on the date of filing the suit no cause of action for the said relief since general body has not yet appeal under section 37 of the arbitration and conciliation act 1996 and also discussion was made with regard to filing of has not assigned any reasons in the impugned order dated 22 11 2024 the essential ingredient of 6 rule 3 of this m f a is filed under order43rule1r r w section151of cpc praying to set side the order dated2211 2024 passed
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT