Depositories Act 1996 22 Of 1996 Section 19f - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: depositories act 1996 22 of 1996 section 19f Year: 2012 Page 1 of about 321 results (1.409 seconds)Rudra Pratap Duttaa Vs. Satendra Nath Duttaa and Others
Court : Patna
Decided on : Feb-23-2012
g of sub section 1 of section 2 of the depositories act 1996 3 whoever enters into any benami transaction shall person shall be allowed in any of it claim or action by or on behalf of a person claiming to be registered will executed by the original plaintiff dated 01 01 1996 by the impugned judgment and decree dated 22 02 2007 property this suit has been filed in the year 1995 22 section 3 of the benami transaction act 1988 reads as respectively assigned to them in clauses and g of sub section 1 of section 2 of the depositories act 1996 3
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAntony Pattukulangara, Pattukulangara House, Mutathiparambu P.O.,chert ...
Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jul-11-2012
depositors quota in terms of section 28 1c of the act this shall be done at the earliest however we make this case the society has taken deposits above rs 22 22 crores and has made advances above rs 20 4 crores because we find that the operations of second proviso to sections 2 oa and 2 ob and also section 28 1c
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTReserve Bank of India Vs. Crb Capital Markets Ltd.
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-21-2012
about 5 years and for the reason of the business activities of not only the company but all its group companies company before registration inspections were carried out between november 13 1996 and november 18 1996 with reference to crb capitals financial propounder of the scheme and ex directors of the page 22 of 77 company so as to enable the company to bench of this court q 1 whether a scheme under section 391 392 of the companies act is maintainable in a
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGujarat Indust.invest.Corpn.Ltd Vs. Crb Capital Markets Ltd.
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-21-2012
of the securities laws second amendment act 1999 under this act or the rules or regulations made thereunder or page 57 company before registration inspections were carried out between november 13 1996 and november 18 1996 with reference to crb capitals financial shares of the very same company in liquidation was unacceptable 22 the learned counsel also sought to distinguish the decision of under section 45mc and the question of non application of section 391 of the companies act in a winding up petition
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMalanpur Steel Ltd. Vs. Crb Capital Markets Ltd.
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-21-2012
up of a non banking financial company under the companies act 1956 on being satisfied that any one or more of were carried out between november 13 1996 and november 18 1996 with reference to crb capitals financial position as on 31 premises held by the company prior to the order dated 22 5 97 passed in cp no 191 97 be permitted the rbi act should be read with the provisions of sections 430 529 529a of the companies act 1956 section 45
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSecurities and Exchange Board of India Vs. Crb Capital Market Ltd.
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-21-2012
with section 45mb 1 and 45mb 2 of the rbi act and served the same in the corporate office of crb were carried out between november 13 1996 and november 18 1996 with reference to crb capitals financial position as on 31 respective landlords after paying the rent due to them till 22 5 97 subject to the landlords depositing the security amount petition no 251 2002 seeking sanction of a scheme under sections 391 392 of the companies act 1956 that scheme of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAll India Networks Welfare Trust and Others Vs. Superintendent of Poli ...
Court : Orissa
Decided on : Dec-12-2012
opposite party no 7company and as such no cause of action had arisen in favour of the petitioners to file the of 2011 in the matter of an application under articles 226 227 of the constitution of india all india networks welfare application no 16 of 2009 on 29 10 2009 under sections 391 to 394 of the companies act 1956 for approval
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMohanraj and Others Vs. State Rep by Additional Superintendent of Poli ...
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Oct-05-2012
them were directors in the company and they were not actively involved in the offence and therefore bail has to be there are 1432 persons have been cited as witnesses and 2234 documents have been referred 15 he also submitted that a and money circulation scheme banning act 1978 ndash section 4 section 5 ndash accused entered into a criminal conspiracy to collect
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPatnala Venkata Ramakrishna and Others Vs. M/S. Midwest (India) Indust ...
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Aug-21-2012
whether as a bar or as the foundation of an action may conclusively bind the parties or in the case of 1373 state of gujarat v rajesh kumar chimanlal barot air 1996 sc 2664 kesar singh v sadhu 1996 7 scc 711 230 smt nai bahu v lal ramnarayan air 1978 sc 22 natraj studios pvt ltd v navrang studio air 1981 sc office of the company concerned is situate as indicated by section 2 11 read with section 10 1 a of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S.Hastalloy India Limited and Another Vs. the Deputy Commissioner of ...
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Aug-16-2012
the four requirements as envisaged under section 16 of the act of 1956 question of there being any further requirement depicting for the block period 01 04 1986 to 28 11 1996 2 the assessee is a company engaged in the manufacture a under appeal 26 therefore i t t a no 22 of 2000 field by the assessee is dismissed and i of due compliance with the four requirements as envisaged under section 16 of the act of 1956 question of there being
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT