Demonstrable - Judgment Search Results

Tek Ram, Demonstrator Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (2005)141PLR283

..... board hereinafter referred to as board in 1971 as gurguide and was subsequently promoted as demonstrator gur khandsari in the year 1984 on 30 7 1981 f i r no 21 .....

Smt. Usha Verma, daughter of Sri Mangala Charan Verma, Assistant teach ...

Court: Patna

mungeshwar sahoo j 1 this appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 30 05 1995 passed by sri...

Cox Vs. Louisiana

Court: US Supreme Court

..... controlling in the face of this affirmative evidence manifesting the plain intent of the demonstrators to condemn the arrest and ensuing judicial proceedings against the prisoners as unfair and ..... tend to rely on this administrative interpretation of how near the courthouse a particular demonstration might take place louisiana s statutory policy of preserving order around the courthouse would .....

D.Thomas Franco Rajendra Dev Vs. Disciplinary Authority and Circle Dev ...

Court: Chennai

..... the affidavit makes no secret of the fact that 250 persons participated in the demonstration the demonstration which was held within the bank s premises near the portico affected not only ..... pm by sbi officers association chennai circle without obtaining prior permission from the bank the demonstration was addressed by general secretary of state bank of india officers association chennai circle .....

Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sanghatan Vs. Union of India

Court: Supreme Court of India

..... freedom of speech and expression which includes carrying out public demonstration also but public demonstration also but public demonstration when becomes violent and damages the public and private properties ..... the provisions for regulating the numbers of persons intending to participate in such demonstrations prescribing the minimum distance from the parliament house north and south blocks supreme .....

Smt. S.Sandhyarani Vs. State of Orissa and Others

Court: Orissa

..... of the petitioner directed that the petitioner be transferred to the department of botany as demonstrator vide annexure 5 the petitioner being aggrieved submitted representation to different authorities but when ..... exchange chhatrapur to sponsor candidates from c b z group for the post of demonstrator in the department of biology botany zoology and accordingly the said employment exchange sponsored .....

Schenck Vs. Pro-choice Network of Western N. Y.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... and sidewalk counseling continued a preliminary injunction as relevant here injunction provisions banned demonstrating within fifteen feet of doorways or doorway entrances parking lot entrances driveways ..... court labeled constructive blockades as well as sidewalk counseling constructive blockades consisted of demonstrating and picketing around the entrances of the clinics and harassing patients and .....

Press Trust of India Ltd. Vs. Neeraj Bhushan

Court: Delhi

..... the petitioners case that it was the respondent who had instigated and organized the said demonstration this finding of the industrial adjudicator according to the petitioner is inconsistent with the ..... choudhury sr manager administration where the only argument on behalf of the management was that demonstrators were raising abusive slogans against the senior members of the management and in support .....

R (on the Application of Adams) (Fc) (Appellant) Vs. Secretary of Stat ...

Court: UK Supreme Court

..... on the forensic processes which culminated in conviction their practical effect is demonstrated in the case of macdermott and mccartney the confessions on which the prosecution relied would ..... but rather of inducements assuming for present purposes that the newly discovered material demonstrated that donnelly had been offered identical inducements to those which macdermott and mccartney had asserted .....

Mccleskey Vs. Kemp

Court: US Supreme Court

..... statute to further a racially discriminatory purpose footnote 20 nor has mccleskey demonstrated that the legislature maintains the capital punishment statute because of the racially ..... under some circumstances proof of discriminatory impact may for all practical purposes demonstrate unconstitutionality because in various circumstances the discrimination is very difficult to explain on .....