Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: delimitation amendment act 2003 section 4 amendment of section 8 Court: chennai Page 91 of about 12,364 results (0.133 seconds)

Jun 18 2007 (HC)

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Yak Granite Industries P. Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2007(214)ELT508(Mad); [2007]294ITR153(Mad)

..... court in gem granites v. commissioner of income-tax : [2004]271itr322(sc) , held that:there are no words of restriction in section 80hhc(2)(b) of the income-tax act, 1961, before amendment in 1991, which qualify the word 'mineral' and it would be reasonable to assume that in the absence of such limitation, the word must be read to include all ..... , were it not for the exception, the specified processed minerals and ores would have been covered by the words 'minerals and ores'. it also indicates that, after the 1991 amendment, only minerals and ores subjected to the process of cutting and polishing would be entitled to the benefit of section 80hhc, meaning thereby that all other species of minerals and ..... p.d. dinakaran, j.1. the above tax case appeal is directed against the order of the income-tax appellate tribunal dated 25.7.2003 made in ita no. 721/mds/1994 raising the following substantial question of law:whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the tribunal was right in holding .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 11 2007 (HC)

Central Warehousing Corporation Represented by Its Managing Director V ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2008)3MLJ382

..... did not adequately address the incidental expenses ...and whereas the parties have now decided in an equitable sharing of those expenses....; now therefore, the parties agree to amend the 1994 agreement as follows....in sense, 'whereas' is used to introduce contractual recitals and the like, but modern drafters increasingly prefer a simple heading such as ..... in this appeal, the central warehousing corporation, the appellant herein has put in issue the order of a learned single judge of this court dated 15.10.2003 made in o.p. no.615 of 2002 setting aside the arbitration award dated 17.10.2001 passed by the second respondent herein and directed the appellant ..... respect of the other objection of holding the arbitration proceedings at delhi, the learned single judge after referring to section 20(2) of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 held that as per the provisions, the convenience of the party was more important for the conduct of the arbitration proceedings. as the dispute arose .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 23 2007 (HC)

Madathil Brothers Vs. the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Special R ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2008)217CTR(Mad)416; [2008]301ITR345(Mad)

..... the same was with reference to the chargeability under section 45 with reference to 'transfer' as defined under section 2(47) as it then stood prior to the amendment under the taxation laws amendment act, 1984 with effect from 1.4.1985. hence, it does not cover the issue on hand. 42. in the decision reported in : [2004]271itr269(bom) (zuari estate ..... sought for reconsideration on the question of loss arising from the film 'kasthuri vijayam'. by order dated 1.9.2003, the tribunal allowed the m.p on the question of capital gains on the sale of the immovable property accepting the same as long-term capital gains. it is stated ..... this court under order dated 23.4.2004. 3. it is stated that subsequent to the disposal of the appeal, the applicant filed m.p. nos. 21 & 87 (mds)/2003 before the tribunal seeking a decision again on the question of capital gains arising thereon treated as a short-term gain and not a long term one. the appellant also .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 09 2011 (HC)

Dr.B.K.Madhankumar and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Chennai

..... . it is further contended by the petitioners that the university is very much coming within the definition of 'person' as per the amendment act, 1993 and the diploma in clinical pathology is a p.g.diploma course, which is a recognised medical p.g.diploma course and the doctors qualified with ..... and technical education in order to maintain uniform standards throughout india and to take away from the state list legislative power by deletion of entry 11 and also by amending entry 25 of the concurrent list. therefore, the states exercise of executive power must be made consistent with the aforesaid constitutional scheme of curbing of its legislative ..... decisions reported in (1999) 7 scc 120 (dr.preeti srivastava v. state of madhya pradesh & others); (2001) 8 scc 664 (state of punjab v. dayanand medical college); (2003) 7 scc 83 (state of madhya pradesh & others v. gopal d.tirthani & others) and (2007) 10 scc 201 (maharashtra university of health sciences v. paryani mukesh jawaharlal .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 07 2012 (HC)

Krishnaveni Vs. Meera at Devaki.

Court : Chennai

..... legitimate, whether such child is born before or after the commencement of marriage law (amendment) act, 1976 as whether or not a decree of nullity is granted in respect of that marriage under this act, and whether or not the marriage is held to be void otherwise than on ..... eligible to receive the pension.12. in the result, the judgment and decree in o.s.no.8 of 1996 dated 30.12.2003 on the file of i additional principal family court, chennai is modified to that extent and this appeal is allowed in part accordingly. ..... a decree of nullity if the marriage contravenes any of the clauses i.e., i, iv and v of section 5 of the act. section 5(1) stipulates that marriage cannot be legally solemnised when either party has a spouse living at the time of such marriage ..... prayer: appeal suit filed under section 19 (1) of the family court act, against the judgment and decree passed in o.s.no.8 of 1996, dated 30.12.2003 by the learned i additional principal family court at chennai.judgments.vimala, j.1. who .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 25 2012 (HC)

Tamilavel Uma Maheswaranar Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu.

Court : Chennai

..... had taken notice of the disciplinary proceedings. thereafter the committee met and resolved to amend the application for approval and they forwarded a letter dated 17.7.2003 amending the request to grant approval for dismissal from 30.4.2003. the respondents rejected it by saying that there is no possibility of revising the ..... that the appellant has dismissed the fourth and fifth respondents without seeking approval of the competent authority prescribed under the tamil nadu private college (regulations) act 1976 and it is well settled principles laid down by several decisions of the honourable apex court and this court that prior approval of competent ..... were heard.3. the appellant-college viz. tamilavel uma maheswaranar karanthai arts college, is an aided educational institution governed by tamil nadu private college (regulations) act 1976 and rules. the 4th respondent in both the writ appeals viz. dr.s.senthil kumar and dr.durai panneerselvam are associate professors in the abovesaid .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 09 2012 (HC)

S.Sandhya Vs. the Chief General Manager and ors.

Court : Chennai

..... high court of calcutta. the question to be asked is why the word "absolutely" hitherto before existing in section 5 of the employees' provident funds act, 1952 was deliberately omitted by the amending act xi of 1946. was it the intention of the legislature that even after omission of the said word from the said provision, the nominee must ..... statutory position on the above aspects. as per gpf (cs rules) and cpf (india rules), central government employees, who have been appointed on or before 31.12.2003, they are entitled to general provident fund, subject to terms and conditions contained in the above said rules.15. rule 10 of the said rules, deals with the ..... amounts have not been deposited, till the date of filing of the counter affidavit.6. record of proceedings shows that when the matter came up on 29.08.2003, after hearing both the learned counsel for the petitioners and the director of bsnl, chennai, the 3rd respondent, this court has granted injunction directing the respondents 1 to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 18 2012 (HC)

Badrilal Sharma Vs. State by the Intelligence Officer

Court : Chennai

..... against a2 for the offences under sections 8(c) r/w 21c, 27a, 28 and 29 of ndps act, 1985 as amended by act 9/2001 and under section 3(3) of passport entry in india act, 1920 and under section 14 of the foreigner act, 1946.3. since the absconding accused namely, guddu singh @ vikram singh and ravi were not able ..... be taken into evidence against him and therefore, the conviction recorded based on the above exhibit falls short of law. for the same, he relied upon the decision reported in 2003 (1) mwn crime page 97 (shanmughavadivel @ kannan v. state by inspector of police, colachel police station, kanyakumari district), in which, it was held that non examination ..... 54 where also presumption is available to be drawn from possession of illicit articles. this position was highlighted in madan lal and anr. v. state of himachal pradesh (2003 (6) scale 483).14. in the factual scenario of the present case not only possession but conscious possession has been established. it has not been shown by the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 27 2012 (HC)

K.Ganapathy. Vs. Ms.Sakthi Sugar Limited.

Court : Chennai

..... the petitioner/defendant has harvested the sugarcane crop on 28.04.2008, but failed to take any steps to modify the relief and after 1 = years the present amendment to amend the plaint has been sought for, which is highly belated and the same is impermissible in law.6. lastly, it is the contention of the learned counsel for ..... in substitution of, such performance.' also, by virtue of section 21(2) of the specific relief act, 1963, the court is empowered to award compensation/damages, in case, it comes to the conclusion that specific performance ought not to be granted, when the contract between the ..... plaintiff in i.a.no.1213 of 2009 claiming damages by giving up the plea of specific performance is maintainable in law as per section 21 of the specific relief act, 1963 which enjoins that 'in a suit for specific performance of a contract, the plaintiff may also claim compensation for its breach, either in addition to, or .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 01 2016 (HC)

P.K. Muthukumar Vs. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... that alprazolam has been deleted by virtue of the amendment dated 26.2.2003 from the schedule appended to narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances rules as amended in 2003 and consequently n.d.p.s act cannot be invoked against the petitioner is concerned, one has to consider both the act as well as rule together. section 2 (xxiii ..... ) of the n.d.p.s act defines psychotropic substance : psychotropic substance means any substance, ..... declared as prescriptive drug, which may attract the provisions of drugs and cosmetic act and not ndps act and therefore, ndps act cannot be invoked against the petitioner. the next point which was canvassed by the learned counsel is that by virtue of amendment dated 9.6.1988 alprazolam was deleted from the schedule (1) of the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //