Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: delimitation amendment act 2003 section 4 amendment of section 8 Court: chennai Page 100 of about 12,364 results (0.304 seconds)

The Southern Railway, Rep. by Its Chairman Vs. S. Ponnusamy and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2007)3MLJ154

..... kosavampatti village in namakkal taluk in namakkal district.22. the above notification purports to be issued under section 48-b of the act as amended by the land acquisition (tamil nadu amendment) act, 1996 (tamil nadu act 16/1997).section 48-b is extracted hereunder:48-b. transfer of land to original owner in certain cases.- where the ..... 48-b can be considered. such opinion was given by the special commissioner and commissioner of land administration, on the basis of letter, dated 1.12.2003 sent by the railway authorities. the railway authorities intended to abandon the project as the cost of acquisition was assuming astronomical proportion on account of the ..... notification is issued in g.o.ms. no. 164 transport, dated 3.12.2003. this notification purports to be 'withdrawal notification under the land acquisition act' and is extracted as under:under sub-section 48-b of the land acquisition act, 1894 (central act of 1894), the governor of tamil nadu hereby withdraw from acquisition of lands .....

Vijaya and Meenakumari Vs. the Inspector General of Registration

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR2007Mad276; 2007(3)CTC756; (2007)4MLJ1240

..... of section 47a: provided that in so far as an order passed under sub-section (6) of section 47a between the commencement of the indian stamp (tamil nadu amendment) act, 1998 (tamil nadu act 1 of 2000) and ending with 9th march 2001 is concerned, the said period of two months shall be reckoned from the 9th march 2001.8. considering the submissions ..... 1 of the impugned order.3. learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the order was passed by the special collector(stamps) on 11.8.2003, which was served on the petitioner only on 14.10.2003; that the said date is crucial; from that date onwards, the period of limitation started running and the appeal was filed on 12.12 ..... bench, this court is of the view that the order passed by the special tahsildar stamps was received by the petitioner on 14.10.2003, which fact is not in dispute, the appeal was filed on 12.12.2003, hence, the appeal is in time. 9. in the result, condition no. 1 of the impugned order passed by the respondent is .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Rugmini Ram Ragav Spinners P. Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2008)220CTR(Mad)520; [2008]304ITR417(Mad)

..... repaid:provided further that nothing in this sub-section shall apply to or in relation to the repayment of any deposit before the date on which the income-tax (second amendment) act, 1981, receives the assent of the president.the above section provides that no branch of a banking company, co-operative bank and no other company or co-operative ..... further that nothing in this sub-section shall apply to or in relation to the repayment of any deposit on or after the date on which the income-tax (second amendment) act, 1981, receives the assent of the president. (2) no branch of a banking company or a co-operative bank and no other company or co-operative society and ..... . janarthana raja, j.1. this appeal is filed under section 260a of the income tax act, 1961 by the revenue, against the order of the income tax appellate tribunal, bench 'a', madras in i.t.a. no. 1195(mds)/94 dated 18.06.2003. on 22.06.2004, this court admitted the appeal and formulated the following substantial questions of .....

Reena Silicate Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Gail (India) Ltd. and anr.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR2006Mad266

..... it was for about three years, i.e. from 27-2-1999 to 31-12-2002. when the applicant sought for extension of supply of gas, certain amendments were incorporated and a new contract was signed on 16-12-2002. it is specifically urged by the learned senior counsel that the applicant signed the contract without any ..... court granted an order of interim injunction on 8-4-2005.3. learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the five year contract dated 16-12-2002 was amended unilaterally by the respondent without having any discussion with the applicant and the applicant was forced to sign under duress and protest. he also submitted that the applicant ..... maintainable. it is also submitted by the learned senior counsel that under section 9 of the act, one could get interim orders pending disposal of the arbitration proceedings. in this case, the applicant after writing a letter to the respondent on 2-8-2003 invoking the arbitration clause, has not done anything. in all fairness, they should have .....

Rukmani College of Education Run by Rukmani Educational and Charitable ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2008(1)CTC545; AIR2008Mad127; 2008(3)AIRKarR210(FB); 2008(1)MLJ1217

..... in institutions for higher education or research and scientific and technical institutions.this entry has remained unchanged since the inception of the constitution. before the constitution (forty-second amendment) act, 1976, which came into force with effect from 03.1.1977, entry 11 in list ii, i.e. the state list and entry 25 in list ..... will be set at naught and directed the first respondent university to consider the request of the appellant for grant of affiliation for the academic years 2002-2003, 2003-2004 after making necessary inspection. a cursory reading of the judgment of the division bench would show that the controversy arose due to the persistent blind ..... -nursing college. the management then filed a writ petition seeking writ of mandamus directing the first respondent-university to grant affiliation for the academic years 2002-2003, 2003-2004 and 2004-2005. a counter-affidavit was filed by the first respondent-university in which it was stated that taking note of the time frame .....

The Corporate Manager, Csi Corporate Schools Vs. the State of Tamil Na ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2007)1MLJ378

..... rules and also in violation of g.o.ms.no.79 dated 14.6.2005 andg.o.ms. no. 125 dated 12.11.2003. the learned counsel further submits that the act or rules are not amended and as per the statutory rule, there is no subject-wise roaster to be followed by the aided schools and the schools are entitled to appoint ..... not in dispute that the tamil nadu recognised private schools (regulation) act, 1973 and the rules framed thereunder or the tamil nadu minority schools (recognition and payment of grant) rules, 1977 are not amended till date. it is also not in dispute thatg.o. ms. no. 125 dated 12.11.2003 issued by the first respondent, which is governing the appointment of middle .....

K.R. Gowri Sedhuraman Vs. the Kumbakonam Municipality, Rep. by Its Exe ...

Court : Chennai

..... pay rs. 19,940/-.13. the learned counsel appearing for the appellant/plaintiff has laconically contended that the defendant has revised the tax in question as per the amending act 65 of 1997 and the same has not been notified by the government of tamilnadu and therefore, erstwhile provisions have to be followed in fixing property tax as ..... the defendant that the plaintiff has demolished the old building and put up a new building and the tax has been revised as per amending act 65 of 1997 and after advent of the amending act, the old procedure for fixing tax has become redundant and therefore, the revised tax fixed by the defendant is not illegal and under ..... revised tax. before assessing revised tax, no opportunity has been given to the plaintiff and further, the revised tax has been made only on the basis of the amending act 65 of 1997 and the same has not been notified and therefore, the procedure adopted by the defendant in fixing revised tax is totally illegal. under the said .....

Kensoft Infotech Limited Rep. by Its Director V.P. Singh Vs. Sundaram ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : LC2010(1)301

..... existence, validity or termination, shall be referred to and finally resolved by arbitration in chennai in accordance with the provisions of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996, or any statutory amendments thereof or under any other statute in force passed by the indian state to govern the arbitration proceedings.14. the above clause would clearly indicate ..... jointly and severally on the causes of action referred to above alleging that there was a collusive piracy of copyright. the apex court in a case reported in : (2003) 5 scc 531 (sukanya holdings (p) ltd. v. jayesh h. pandya and anr.) has held as follows:11. for appreciating the contentions raised by the ..... into a vendor's agreement dated 30th january 2001 for providing license to the 1st defendant to use ken_hfs software developed by the plaintiff, on 29th january 2003, 20th february 2004 and 4th march 2005, when the plaintiff and the 1st defendant has entered into subsequent vendor's agreement for providing license to the 1st .....

M/S.Sonali Rep. by Its Partner Mr.Amit K.Saiya, Vs. C.Balaji.

Court : Chennai

..... have well intended that the provisions sufficiently and amply do indicate, by their very force, the degree of interference with contractual tenancies sought to be enforced. the amending act, madras act xi of 1964, including section 3 thereof, cannot be struck down as ultra vires under article 14 of the constitution of india on the ground of hostile ..... the plea of hostile discrimination or the denial of equal protection of the law either with regard to the amending act xi of 1964, or with regard to the earlier rent control enactments of the madras legislature, including act xviii of 1960. these successive enactments have embodied a perfectly rational principle of classification and the criteria and their ..... the terms of the lease having renewed it after the first 20 years.38.the revision petitioner/tenant has filed a suit in o.s.no.4790 of 2003 against g.venugopal and others who have attempted to break the roof of the revision petitioner's/ tenant's premises to forcibly evict her and the trial .....

Smt. Vijayashanthi Vs. the Assistant Commissioner

Court : Chennai

..... year 1992-1993 to assessment year 1994-1995 when penalty was exigible only against person who has not previously been assessed under this act. these words were omitted by the finance act 2002, only with effect from 01.04.2003. this amendment therefore is extending the scope of penalty for all assesses is only with effect from 01.04 ..... .2003,i.e. for assessment year 2003-2004. circular no.204 dated 24.07.1976 explaining the insection of explanation 3 does not state, why ..... tuticorin, 1984, supp scc 437: (air 1984 sc 1693 : 1984 tax lr 1197) this court observed that the pendency of the reassessment proceedings under the act cannot act as a bar to the institution of the criminal proceedings and postponement or adjournment of a proceedings for an unduly long period on the ground that proceedings having a .....