Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: delimitation amendment act 2003 section 4 amendment of section 8 Court: chennai Page 1 of about 12,364 results (0.180 seconds)

Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam rep. by its Organisation Secretary R.S. Bhar ...

Court : Chennai

..... election with the existing territorial area of divisions or wards in respect of the urban local bodies, for which delimitation work has not yet been completed. therefore, the contention of the petitioner that the amendment acts have been passed only to subserve the cause of particular political party/ruling party, is totally unjustified. 36. ..... i.e., the ruling party during the local body elections conducted in 2006 had, even though on receipt of the 2001 census, received in 2003, had enacted similar amendments to retain the territorial area of the municipal councils for similar reasons, stated in the objects and reasons therein. such being the case, when retention ..... of the territorial area by the previous government, due to receipt of the 2001 census during 2003, the yardstick adopted by the respondents herein in carrying out the present amendments for conduct of the elections, as mandated in the constitution, could, by no stretch of imagination, be termed as .....

In Re: A.R.M. Manickam Chettiar

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1968CriLJ256

..... and without any delay. after watching the progress of the working of the prevention of corruption act of 1947, parliament enacted the criminal law amendment act of 1952.4. in order to deal with the question whether the power of the district magistrate to order investigation should be delimited within any particular area or local jurisdiction, it is necessary to have a precise idea ..... 5-a cannot be equated to the special judge functioning under the criminal law amendment act of 1952. the inference is therefore irresistible that under the scheme of section 5-a, there is no warrant for introducing the notion of magistrate having competency to try the offender or delimit the area. the sole object underlying section 5-a is that the delinquent officer .....

S. Anandhan Vs. The Secretary, Election Commission of India, New Delhi ...

Court : Chennai

..... the provisions of articles 330 and 332 of the constitution of india read with section 9(1)(c) and 9(1)(d) of the said act. thus, the then delimitation commission had delimited the boundaries, including of tamil nadu, on the basis of the census figures of the year 2001. the constituencies reserved for the scheduled castes ..... is to be the 2001 census after adopting the 84th and 87th amendments to the constitution of india in the year 2001 and 2003 respectively. this position is to continue to prevail and remain so until a fresh census is taken after 2026 when the re-delimitation would take place. 7. the petitioner pleads that in terms of ..... reserved for the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes. 16. the respondents also pleaded that the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes order (amendment) act, 1976 has nothing to do with the present exercise, as that act was to provide for the inclusion or exclusion from the lists of scheduled castes and scheduled tribes, and of certain castes and tribes .....

Bengal Corporation Private Ltd. Vs. the State of Madras

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1965]16STC62(Mad)

..... the question of the proper interpretation of the provisions of sections 4 and 5, it is necessary to briefly advert to the prior legislative background, before the constitution sixth amendment act of 1956.5. the power of the state to levy sales tax was made subject to the limitations contained in article 286 of the constitution. there was sharp ..... a plurality of next leading to the inevitable evil of multiple taxation. the legislature has solved difficulties and problems by using adequate language in section 4 to define and delimit the positive concept of a sale inside the state, as well as the negative concept of a sale outside the state.15. i am clearly of the opinion ..... 434 and the second travancore case [1953] 4 s.t.c. 205. it was naturally realised that. article 286, as it then stood, which contained provisions merely delimiting the jurisdiction of the states to levy sales tax, did not serve the real purpose, and that, in the interests of uniformity and in view of the great importance of .....

Sessions Judge Vs. Perumal and anr.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1974CriLJ261

..... an offence punishable with transportation or imprisonment and who at the time of such conviction was under the age of sixteen years.'11. as a result of the amending act 26 of 1'955 (central) transportation for life was replaced by imprisonment for life and transportation for a shorter term was altogether abolished except in cases where ..... transportation for life; for instance, it could try a case of murder. (2) so far as the other courts mentioned in section 4 were concerned, their jurisdiction was delimited by schedule ii of. the code of criminal procedure; in other words, they could try offences which they could try under the schedule : (3) all those courts ..... was that, while the juvenile court could try any offence whatsover. including an offence punishable with death, the other courts could try only cases within the delimitation indicated by schedule ii of the code of criminal procedure. i shall have to revert to this question later.16. having indicated (the true construction of the .....

Sessions Judge Vs. Perumal and anr. and the Additional Sessions Judge

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1974)1MLJ105

..... of an offence punishable with transportation or imprisonment and who at the time of such conviction was under the age of sixteen years.' as a result of the amending act xxvi of 1955 (central) transportation for life was replaced by imprisonment for life and transportation for a shorter term was altogether abolished except in cases where the ..... for life; for instance, it could try a case of murder. (2) so far as the other courts mentioned in section 4 were concerned, their jurisdiction was delimited by schedule ii of the code of criminal procedure; in other words, they could try offences which they could try under the schedule; (3) all those courts could ..... was that, while the juvenile court could try any offence whatsoever, including an offence punishable with death, the other courts could try only cases within the delimitation indicated by schedule ii of the code of criminal procedure. i shall have to revert to this question later.15. having indicated the true construction of the madras .....

Ramalingam Chettiar and anr. Vs. Tamil Nadu Water and Drainage Board R ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1990ACJ443

..... jurisdiction is strictly limited by the terms of such statute. it cannot be allowed to exceed its limits on any general principle of law. the jurisdiction should be delimited strictly in terms of the statutory definition thereof. it was further held that, unless it is expressly or by necessary implication taken away from the purview of civil ..... behalf of the plaintiff/respondent, mr. phillips, learned counsel, relies upon the decision in r selvaraj v. jagannathan 1969 acj 1 (mad), which arose before the 1969 amendment, and it was held that any claim for damage to the vehicle could be tried only by a civil court because:.the tribunal is a creature of the statute and ..... decision in r. thillai govindan v. v. karuppasamy 1979 acj 445 (mad), which holds that after the amendment effected by act 56 of 1969, the jurisdiction of the tribunal got enlarged, so as to cover the subjects added by the amendment and one of them being the claim relating to damage to property of a third party upto a limit .....

Ramalingam Chettiar and anr. Vs. the Tamil Nadu Water and Drainage Boa ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1989)1MLJ485

..... the decision in r. tiiillai govindan v. karuppusamy 91 l.w. 563 which holds that, after the amendment effected by act 56 of 1969, the jurisdiction of the tribunal got enlarged, so as to cover the subjects added by the amendment and one of them being the claim relating to damages to property of a third party upto a limit ..... jurisdiction is strictly limited by the terms of such statute. it cannot be allowed to exceed its limits on any general principle of law. the jurisdiction should be delimited strictly in terms of the statutory definition thereof.it was further held that, unless it is expressly or by necessary implication taken away from the purview of civil courts ..... by a competent legislation, such suits would be maintainable.5. after the 1969 amendment, an option is given to the claimant either to have it decided by the tribunal or by a civil court, in instances in which a composite claim is made .....

Commissioner, Corporation of Madras Vs. Assistant Collector of Central ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1978(2)ELT653(Mad)

..... purposes other than sale. in bur view even under section 2(f) as it originally stood, the position could not have been different, the change brought about by the amending act v of 1964 was only in the definition of manufacturer. the definition of the word 'manufacturer' under section 2(f) is so wide as to include any process incidental ..... for sale. we are not inclined to construe the definition of manufacturer' as delimiting the scope of either the definition of'manufacture' or the charge or imposition under section 3.4. it cannot be disputed that after the amendment of section 2(f) by the central act v of 1964 there cannot be any distinction between the manufacture of goods for ..... on such goods under section 3. we are not able to accept the petitioner's stand. the definitions of 'manufacture' and 'manufacturer in section 2(f) of the act as it stood then and after its amendment by central act v of 1964 are set out below so far as they are relevant for the purpose of this case.before .....

State of Tamil Nadu Vs. Aristo Paints (P.) Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1992]85STC54(Mad)

..... in such manner as may be prescribed.' 4. the provision in section 31(1) quoted above as it stands today is one after first amended by act 76 of 1986 and again amended by act 18 of 1989. before the amendments, the proviso to section 31(1) read as follows : 'provided that the appellate assistant commissioner may admit an appeal presented after the ..... has to be exercised under the old law which so continues to exist.' 7. since we are of the opinion that the law as it stood prior to the amendment by act 76 of 1986 continued to govern the case of the assessee/respondent, we have no hesitation in upholding the order of the tribunal. the tribunal has rightly remanded ..... the authority has no option or jurisdiction to admit the appeal unless it be accompanied by the deposit of the assessed tax as required by the amended proviso to section 22(1) of the act overlooks the fact of existence of the old law for the purpose of supporting the pre-existing right and really amounts to begging the question. .....