Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: delimitation amendment act 2003 section 4 amendment of section 8 Court: chennai Page 89 of about 12,364 results (0.176 seconds)

Jun 05 2012 (HC)

The Planters Association of Tamil Nadu. Vs. the Secretary to Governmen ...

Court : Chennai

..... any objective norms. that makes it difficult for us to substitute our own judgment for that of the government on the question whether section 3 of the amendment act should be brought into force.... it is for these reasons that we are unable to accept the submission that by issuing a mandamus, the central government must ..... reasons for providing for welfare officers considered unnecessary for 55 years was suddenly considered to be necessary is not correct. it is submitted that during the year 2003 to 2007 out of total 24,734 number of inspections made by the inspector of plantations, 1533 contraventions were found and 916 number of prosecutions were ..... employment department dated 28.12.2006. in fact before issuing the orders the government of tamilnadu have addressed the government of india vide government letter no.29919/12/2003-9, labour and employment department, dated 14.12.2004 for approval. and after getting approval of the government of india, ministry of labour and employment, new .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 30 2012 (HC)

R. Ekambaram Vs. the Government of Tamil Nadu Rep by Its Secretary Rev ...

Court : Chennai

..... 27432 of 2004), this court had held as follows: "2. according to the petitioner, in the light of the tamil nadu urban land (ceiling and regulation) amendment act 20 of 1999 and since the petitioner continue to remain in possession of the land in question, the acquisition proceedings automatically abates and therefore, the possession of the petitioner ..... petitioner plead that they have not received any compensation. hence, where the possession has not been taken over by the government such lands are also attracted the amending act 20 of 1999 and consequently, the government cannot claim any right over such lands. 13.as already held when the petitioners are in possession of the land, ..... to the land owners, the petitioners are entitled for the benefit of the amending act 20 of 1999 and consequently the entire proceedings initiated under the tamil nadu act 24 of 1978 would lapse." 13.10. in mrs.ayesha haque v. state of tamil nadu and others (2003 writ l.r. 193) , this court had held as follows: " .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 06 2015 (HC)

Nainar and Others Vs. Chelliah and Others

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... share in the suit property as she was married 50 years back and daughters became entitled to share only from 25.03.1989 as per the amendment to hindu succession act 1956 by the amendment act 1/1990. this contention is contrary to law. the first respondent stated that periya patchai perumal died in the year 1958. no contra evidence was ..... to the appellants upto 2001. thereafter, he failed to give their share inspite of repeated demands. he also failed to agree for partition as demanded by them on 10.03.2003. the suit property is joint family property. hence, they filed a suit for partition. 7. the first respondent did not file any written statement. 8. the case ..... of the district munsif court, thoothukudi and allow this second appeal.) 1. the appellants are the plaintiffs and the respondents are the defendants in o.s.no.126 of 2003 on the file of the principal district munsif, thoothukudi. the suit filed by the appellants was decreed partly, by the judgment and decree, dated 04.02.2004. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 12 2017 (HC)

M/s. Tungabadra Minerals Private Limited Vs. The Chennai Port Trust Re ...

Court : Chennai

..... ore charges, cleaning charges, pollution levy and marine charges as wharf age charges deposit as per the scale of rates for the chennai port trust and as amended from time to time within seven administrative working days as security deposit from the date of receipt of the allotment order, failing which the allotment will be liable ..... to pay the defendant the license fee for such shortfall quantity. 3. the plaintiff alleged that they had exported the minimum guaranteed quantity continuously from the period 2002-2003 till 2009-2010. however, owing to various complaints, the government of karnataka issued g.o.no. loe 186 psp 2010, bangalore, dated 26.07.2010 prohibiting ..... totally upsets the very foundation upon which the parties rested their bargain, it can very well be said that the promissory finds it impossible to do the act which he promised to do. although various theories have been propounded by the judges and jurists in england regarding teh juridical basis of the doctrine of frustration, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 28 2016 (HC)

Malabar Diamond Gallery Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The Additional Director General ...

Court : Chennai

..... no.72/97-cus. (nt), dated 22.12.1997, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1a) of section 110 of the customs act, 1962 (52 of 1962), made amendments in the schedule 4a to the said notification, specifying gold in all forms, including bullion, ingot, coin, ornament, crude jewellery, the provisional release is permissible ..... any specified direction by issuing a notification in this behalf. the effect of interpretation of the words prohibited goods was considered inom prakash bhatia vs. commissioner of customs (2003 (6) scc 161) and in paragraph no.10 of the said judgment the supreme court held as follows: 10. from the aforesaid definition, it can be stated ..... cannot be permitted to be imported and thus, to be treated as prohibited from being imported. 79. in om prakash bhatia v. commissioner of customs, delhi reported in 2003 (155) elt 423 (sc), the hon'ble apex court held that if there is intentional over-invoicing of the goods imported, then such goods imported, fall under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 06 2011 (HC)

P.Anand Vs. the Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court : Chennai

..... as follows: based on medical council of india notification no. 164 dated 16th october, 2003 and the honble high court ruling dated 12-12-2003, standard of passing as prescribed in rule 57 of ordinance 1 of 2002 (amended) for passing in internal assessment head with thirty-five per cent marks is mandatory to ..... obligations in maintaining the highest standard in medical education in the country, by virtue of the powers conferred under section 33 of the indian medical council act, 1956 and with the prior approval of the central government, the medical council of india framed rules laying down the minimum standard of infrastructure, teaching ..... it is stated that the medical council of india is an expert body created to maintain highest standard of medical education under the indian medical council act, 1956 having the power of supervision regarding the qualification and eligibility standards for admission into medical institutions and having overall invigilation by relying upon the decision .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 01 1922 (PC)

P.S. Narayana Aiyar Vs. Biyari Bivi Alias Kathun Bivi and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1922)43MLJ559

..... insure those, who acquire rights in property dealt with in a previous decree, against the effect of a subsequent amendment thereof. this and the consequence, that an application for amendment should be rejected as too late, if the rights of third parties acting in good faith have intervened, is recognized in nation v. harris (1892) a.c. 547, and langat ..... for plaintiff's benefit. in fact, as the copies filed here of the affidavits on which it acted show, it was told nothing of those facts or of the present proceedings, from which the necessity for plaintiff's obtaining an amendment had arisen, the construction which had actually been adopted by us being represented in one affidavit merely as ..... singh v. janki koer (1911) 1 l.r. 39 cal 265. it is clear that, if the amending court, the district court of madura, had had the full facts before .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 12 1924 (PC)

In Re: Appasamy Aiyar

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1925Mad1122; (1925)49MLJ276

..... learned judges, ramesam and wallace, jj., express their view that the new criminal procedure code amending act does not affect the complaint filed under the act before the amendment. in criminal miscellaneous petition no. 606 of 1924 it was held by krishnan, j. that ' the amendment of the criminal procedure code did not affect complaints already filed on sanction properly obtained. section ..... the old code and the charge framed against him should now be considered bad in law, because of an alteration in the procedure laid down by the amended code. the learned vakil for the petitioner has relied upon two decisions of this court, namely nataraja pillai v. rangaswami pillai ilr (1923) m 384 ..... really the contention of the petitioners--is not a conclusion which appears to me justified either in law or in common sense. the consequence of an amendment of procedure is not that all matters properly begun under the old procedure collapse and have to be begun again under the new procedure, but that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 06 2009 (HC)

N.S. Jaya Vs. the Secretary, Department of Revenue, Government of Tami ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2009)5MLJ357

..... . 27432 of 2004, this court had held as follows:2. according to the petitioner, in the light of the tamil nadu urban land (ceiling and regulation) amendment act 20 of 1999 and since the petitioner continue to remain in possession of the land in question, the acquisition proceedings automatically abates and therefore, the possession of the petitioner ..... the petitioner plead that they have not received any compensation. hence, where the possession has not been taken over by the government such lands are also attracted the amending act 20 of 1999 and consequently, the government cannot claim any right over such lands.13. as already held when the petitioners are in possession of the land, ..... the land owners, the petitioners are entitled for the benefit of the amending act 20 of 1999 and consequently the entire proceedings initiated under the tamil nadu act 24 of 1978 would lapse.19.10. in mrs. ayesha haque v. state of tamil nadu and ors. 2003 wl.r. 193, this court had held as follows:a perusal of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 24 2008 (HC)

The Assistant Executive Engineer, Distribution/Rural, Tamil Nadu Elect ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2009LC(MAD)782

..... chief electrical inspector or an electrical inspector or licensee or the generating company, as the case may be, for this purpose.15. section 154 of the electricity act, 2003 deals with 'procedure and power of special court' and the same reads as follows;(1) notwithstanding anything contained in the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (2 ..... 135 to 139.16. from the close reading of the sections mentioned supra, it is made clear that after passing of the electricity act, 2003 (i.e., from 10.06.2003), the concerned state government should constitute special courts for the purpose of conducting trials with regard to offences committed under sections 135 to 139 ..... learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner has repeatedly contended that the first appellate court has rendered its judgment on 30.12.2003 and the electricity act, 2003 has come into force on 10.06.2003 and therefore, on the date of pronouncement of the judgment by the first appellate court, the first appellate court has no .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //