Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: delhi rent control act 1958 repealed section 56 power to make rules Court: chennai Page 10 of about 590 results (0.272 seconds)

Vikash J. Shah, Director, M/s. Shah Yarn Tex (P) Ltd. Vs. The Commissi ...

Court : Chennai

..... justification to deny cenvat credit, the revenue has no case and the department is not at liberty to demand either interest or penalty. 12. when the central excise act, 1944 and the rules framed thereunder, permit the adjustment of cenvat credit, and when the cenvat credit is granted, there is no outstanding duty payable and therefore, ..... can be issued only in serious cases where there is allegation of fraud, suppression, willful misstatement or for other reasons mentioned in proviso to section 11a(1) of the act and that unfortunately, provisions of section 11 a(1) had been used unwarrantedly. 8.3. these issues raised by the assessees have been partly answered by the tribunal ..... short-paid or erroneously refunded by reasons of fraud, collusion or any willful mis-statement or suppression of facts, or contravention of any of the provisions of this act or of the rules made thereunder with intent to evade payment of duty, the person who is liable to pay duty as determined under sub-section (2) .....

Rich Source International, Rep. by Its Proprietor, Ms. M. Irene Vs. th ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2009(239)ELT9(Mad)

..... peculiar and complicated requirements of this country.' in hochtief gammon v. state of orissa, this court held that the powers of the courts in england as regards the control which the judiciary has over the executive indicate the minimum limit to which the courts in this country would be prepared to go in considering the validity of orders ..... manufacturer were not submitted by the petitioner and that the dfia licence was issued inadvertently. in this regard, the petitioner, on 08.08.2006, met the dgft, at delhi and asked for the policy clarification of 4.4.2 of foreign trade policy (ftp) and 4.5.5 and hand book of procedure 2004-09 (hbp).(iii) the ..... whose dealer was m/s. sanjri tex, surat. thereafter, the 2nd respondent issued a show cause notice dated 13.02.2007 to the petitioner under section 9 of the act, stating that she had procured fabrics from a trader and not from a manufacturer. despite all explanations and clarificatory letters on the side of the petitioner, the 2nd respondent .....

S. Srinivasan, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Bharat Overseas B ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2000(2)CTC41

..... unless such appointment, reappointment or termination of appointment is made with the previous approval of the reserve bank.'part ii a of the said banking regulations act deals with control over the management. according to section 36aa whether the reserve bank is satisfied that in the public interest or in preventing the affairs of a banking ..... for the appointment of the appellant. (h) the reserve bank of india being the bankers bank and which has been vested with very wide powers to control and monitor all the other banks can very well examine the matter and grant approval for the appointment of the appellant as the chairman and chief executive-officer ..... prescribe the limits upto which, the manner in which and the conditions subject to which deposits may be invited or accepted body non banking companies, this court in delhi cloth and general mills v. union of india : [1983]3scr438 observed as under: 'mischief was known and the regulatory measure was introduced to remedy the mischief. .....

Nellai Mavatta Cooli Thozhilalar Sangam Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and or ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1984)IILLJ270Mad

..... rights on account of poverty, ignorance or any other equally relevant social disability. hence, he pleads that in respect of each and every establishment under the control of state of tamil nadu workmen would not be able to move court to secure the rights which are available to them under labour laws and which are ..... hence, when first respondent, being obliged to enforce the provisions of socio-beneficial enactments relating to labour, had taken 14 years to enforce the provisions of the act against third respondent, and would choose to pass orders only on filing the writ petition, the learned counsel for the writ petitioner is justified in seeking for a ..... must view with strictness whenever any violations of labour laws are established before them, and they should punish the errant employers by imposing adequate punishments. touching upon act 37 of 1970, it was held that the benefits to accrue to workmen if not provided by the contractor, the obligation to provide such amenities rests on .....

Marzook Rahman Vs. the Joint Secretary to Government of India, Ministr ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1995CriLJ1307

..... accepted the same. the question in such a case is whether the petitioner has been prejudiced in any manner. the detenu has the right under the act to approach the central government for revocation of his detention in case he fails to convince the detaining authority against his detention. in the instant case, ..... petitioner's right of making an effective and purposeful representation has been impaired. the show cause notice only marks the beginning of adjudication proceedings under the customs act and contains all necessary facts which may form the basis thereof. all those necessary facts are otherwise mentioned in the grounds and, therefore, it is difficult ..... having collected the material as aforesaid, the sponsoring authority placed the same for consideration of the first respondent for an order under section 3(1) of the act. 3. the first respondent on perusal of the material on record felt satisfied that the petitioner was engaged in illegally purchasing foreign exchange and sending the .....

State of Tamil Nadu Vs. Arulmurugan and Company

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1982]51STC381(Mad)

..... expression 'in the opinion of the income-tax officer', the supreme court observed that the expression is aptly used in section 13 of the income-tax act, since the income-tax officer must, in the first instance, makes the determination, but it does not necessarily follow therefrom that the appellate assistant commissioner cannot ..... we may cite another decision, of the supreme court, mahalakshmi textile mills' case : [1967]66itr710(sc) , which also had arisen under the indian income-tax act, 1922, as highlighting, from another angle, the peculiar position of tax appellate tribunals. a general view of the position of appellate authorities under the tax codes is ..... kanpur coal syndicate : [1964]53itr225(sc) the supreme court again examined the nature and scope of the powers of the appellate authorities under the income-tax act, and observed that the scope of the appellate assistant commissioner's power is 'conterminous with that of the income-tax officer', and that the appellate assistant .....

RexIn Sea (India) Vs. Union of India

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1991(34)ECC170; 1991LC282(Madras); 1991(53)ELT218(Mad)

..... this court reported in union of india v. chakra tyres limited : 1990(45)elt3(mad) which is binding on me and since the full bench decision of the delhi high court in bombay conductors & electricals v. chandramouli 1984 e.c.c. 1 may have only a persuasive value, the contention of the respondents is repelled. ..... estoppel will apply. 7. if that be the position, the next question is whether there was any representation by the respondents and whether the petitioner had acted on those representations, which would enable the petitioner to plead that the respondents should be prohibited from going back on their representation. the facts have already been ..... of promissory estoppel is also applicable against the government and it cannot be defeated by invoking the defence of the executive necessity because if party who has, acting in reliance on a promise or representation made by the government, altered his position, is entitled to enforce the promise or the representation against the government, .....

Micro Labs Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Asst. Collector of Central Excise and anr.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1992(40)LC313(Madras)

..... this court can direct refund of duty illegally collected, under article 226 of the constitution, irrespective of the restrictions as to limitations prescribed under the relevant act and the rules. the learned judge also considered that if both the parties were suffering from misconception of the legal position, then the time limit for ..... suit either expressly or by necessary implication. while there are different periods of limitation prescribed for the institution of different kinds of suits by the limitation act, 1963, there is no such period prescribed by law in respect of petitions filed under article 226 of the constitution. whether relief should be granted ..... excise duty. 2. the petitioner is a manufacturer of medicines under tariff item 14-e of the i schedule in the central excises and salt act, 1944 (for short 'the act'). it manufactures leavamisole (l. tetramisole) tablets and dipyridamole tablets, among other medicines. the petitioner preferred a claim for refund by its letter .....

Kothari Optical Industries Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1993(42)ECC319

..... as a free period. rule 13(b) says that where goods are detained by the collector of customs on account of import trade control formalities, or for compliance of formalities prescribed under the drugs act and certified by the collector of customs to be not attributable to any fault or negligence on the part of the importers, demurrage shall ..... dl 1 will help the petitioner. in that case, the division bench held that the customs authorities were liable to pay demurrage charges and ground rent till the goods were released under the customs act, 1962. in view of the above discussions, it is clear that no statutory duty is cast on the part of the third respondent-port trust ..... addition.(b) where goods are detained by the collector of customs, on account of import trade control formalities and certified by the collector of customs to be not attributable to any fault or negligence on the part of the importers, rent shall be recoverable at rs.5.50 per unit for every 2 days or part thereof subject .....

G. Alagiri Vs. Collector of Thanjavur and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1983Mad134

..... the supreme court in bhagat raja v. union of india, , to the present case. it would be inappropriate to apply the rule in tara chand v. delhi municipality, which was pronounced with regard to disciplinary proceedings, and that too, for a limited purpose to state that it is not obligatory for the disciplinary or administrative ..... be observed in its proper spirit and mere pretence of compliance with it would not satisfy the requirement of law." (pp 1785-1785)14. in tara char v. delhi municipality, , threelearned judges of the supreme court dealt with a case of disciplinary action. there, it was contended that the disciplinary authority, exercising quasi-judicial functions, ..... of tamil nadu), judgment dated 20-10-1981, where the learned judge, following the ratio in tara chand v. delhi municipality, , declined to entertain a writ petition impugning an order of the revisional authority under the act on the ground , it was a non-speaking one. the judgment of the learned judge cannot be followed as .....