Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: delhi rent control act 1958 repealed section 56 power to make rules Court: chennai Page 5 of about 590 results (0.315 seconds)

Rajeswari Vs. Joint Secretary to Government, Government of India Minis ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2000(3)CTC97; 2000(72)ECC29

..... order, the grounds of detention and the relied upon materials. thereafter, the role of the advisory board is clearly stipulated in section 8(b) of the act, including the opportunity to be given to the detenu for hearing. it is respectfully submitted that these provisions were strictly complied with in this case. in this ..... standing counsel for the central government argues that that was a case based on a single incidentand more particularly the detention has been passed under the national security act, 1980. in paragraph 12 in anand prakash's case, : air1990sc516 the apex court took note of the fact that though the recovery statement was, made ..... note in rajendra kumar natvarlalshah v. state of gujarat, : 1988crilj1775 and held that considering the nature of investigation and the complications involved in the detentions under cofeposa act, the question of delay takes the backseat. the learned counsel for the petitioner, however, invites the attention of the court to the two judgments of the .....

D. Dorairaj Vs. the Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board (South ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1987(13)ECC130

..... an executive instruction fixing the time limit of 30 days for offering the exchange to sale, cannot form the basis for the proceeding under the provisions of the act. section 14 undoubtedly empowers the central government by notification in the official gazette to order every person in, or resident in, india owning or holding such foreign ..... executive instruction fixing a time limit of 30 days for offering the foreign exchange and it cannot be the basis of punitive proceedings under the provisions of the act. the third contention which has hot been specifically raised in the memorandum of grounds of appeal, but which was raised before us, is that no action could ..... with the first wisconsin bank of milwaukee within one month of his return to india and thereby has violated the provisions of section 9 of the foreign exchange regulation act, 1947 read with central government notification no. fl(67)ec/57 dated 25th september, 1958.3. the appellant who was a student admitted that he was studying .....

Mukkattumbrath Ayisumma Vs. Vayyaprath Pazhae Bangalayil Mayomoothy Um ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1953Mad425; (1952)2MLJ933

..... , in order to amend the law of intestate succession among the mapillas governed by the said marumakathayam or aliyasanthana law of inheritance, the mapilla succession act, (act 1 of 1918) was enacted. it was made applicable to mapillas domiciled in the presidency of madras who were governed by the marumabathayam or aliyasanthana law ..... to briefly state the development of the law governing mappillas of malabar until it reached its final stage as evidenced by the amending act, (act 18 of 1949). before the mapilla succession act, (act 1 of 1918) was enacted, any property owned by a member of a mapilla tarwad belonged to the tarwad, whether it ..... rules of law applicable to intestate succession among mapillas governed by the marumakathayam or the aliyasanthana law of inheritance. there was also another act called the mapilla wills act, (act 7 of 1928), intended to define the law relating to testamentary dispositions by mapillas governed by the marumakathayam or aliyasanthana law of inheritance.4 .....

Ghousia Begum Vs. the Union Territory of Pondicherry

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1975Mad345

..... his functions with regard to the acquisition in question:--"in pursuance of clause (1) of article 239 of the constitution, the president hereby directs that subject to his control and until further orders, the administrator of the union territory of pondi-cherry shall exercise the powers and discharge the functions of the central government under--(i) the ..... as aforesaid, and any such investigation, legal proceeding or remedy may be instituted, continued or enforced and any such penalty, forfeiture or punishment may be imposed as if this act had not been passed:provided that anything done pr any action taken (including any appointment or delegation made, notification, instruction or direction issued, form, bye-law or scheme ..... 1758 of the french code civil reads thus:"1758. when a lease of furnished apartments provides that the rent is to be so much a year, the letting is held to be a letting year by year. when the rent is to be at so much a month, the letting is held to be by the month; and .....

Periyasamy R. Vs. General Manager (Operations), State Bank of India an ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2000)IIILLJ1408Mad

..... correct?' he answered, 'the staggering arrangement was correct.' he further said i cannot say how effectively implemented. in another place p.w.2 had admitted that, if the control had been effective by the concerned people, this would have been avoided. p. w.4 has also admitted that, without any verification he took over the safe keys from ..... well settled that a disciplinary enquiry has to be a quasi-judicial enquiry held according to the principles of natural justice and the enquiry officer has a duty to act judicially. the enquiry officer did not apply his mind to the evidence. save setting out the names of the witnesses, he did not discuss the evidence. he ..... decisions which are perverse and those which are not. if a decision is arrived at on no evidence or evidence which is thoroughly unreliable and no reasonable person would act upon it, the order would be perverse. but if there is some evidence on record which is acceptable and which would be relied upon, howsoever compendious it may .....

N.S. Rathinam and Sons Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1998(102)ELT251(Mad)

..... did not dispute the fact that the central government is also subject to the jurisdiction of this court and that even though the notifications have been issued initially at delhi which is the seat of the central government, nevertheless the notification is meant to have effect throughout the territory of india, and that notification is amenable for being ..... jurisdiction some thing was done in relation to the notification without any qualification. if it is possible to establish a reasonable link between the notification impugned and some act which is germane any material having occurred within the state that would be sufficient to establish that a part of cause of action has arisen within the state. ..... at the rate of rs. 1/400/- per light displacement tonnage. the petitioner has paid the duty as also contravailing duty under section 3 of the customs tariff act, but had not paid the duty at the rate of rs. 1,400/- per light displacement tonnage.2. it is not in dispute that the ship which the .....

C.V. Karunakaran Vs. the Chairman, Central Board of Excise and Customs ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2009(171)LC254(Madras); 2010(249)ELT324(Mad)

..... under the act;(o) the provisions of allied acts including imports and exports (control) act, 1947 (18 of 1947), foreign exchange regulation act, 1973 (46 of 1973), indian explosives act, 1884 (4 of 1884), arms act, 1959 (54 of 1959), opium act, 1978 (1 of 1878), drugs and cosmetics act, 1940 (23 of 1940) destructive insects and pests act, 1914 (2 ..... the 1984 regulations, is automatically entitled to get licence under the 2004 regulation was considered by the ministry of finance central excise and customs, new delhi, in the circular dated 10.6.2004 and it is clarified as follows:issue raisedcommentsregulation 81. regulation 8 passed persons are eligible as applicants for ..... to examine the matter and come up with a scheme to remove the difficulties of the appellants while implementing 2004 regulations as in other areas in delhi and punjab.8. mr. k. ravi anantha padmanaban, learned counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that merely because the appellants/writ petitioners have passed .....

Venkataraman @ Murali @ Raja, Vs. R. Venugopal and R. Ganesan @ Vinaya ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2008)2MLJ348

..... , government of pondicherry) the schedule (see section 1(3) para 1) page 350 refers the year 1952, no. 53 as the notaries act, 1952.36. the pondicherry (administration) act, 1962 (act 49 of 1962) dated 05.12.1962, to provide for the administration of pondicherry and for matters connected therewith, definition section 2 (b) ..... deals about the jurisdiction of district judge, subordinate judge and district munsif in original suits etc. indeed section 4 of the pondicherry civil courts (amendment) act, 2005 speaks of transitory provisions.54. inasmuch as the issue of 'legal representatives' is to be determined by the executing court viz., the principal district ..... such investigation, legal proceeding or remedy may be instituted, continued or enforced and any such penalty, forfeiture or punishment may be imposed as if this act had not been passed:provided that anything done or any action taken (including any appointment or delegation made, notification, instruction or direction issued, form, bye .....

The Commissioner of Central Excise Pondicherry Commissionerate. Vs.

Court : Chennai

..... and 24 of the general clauses act for the purpose of interpretation of rule 4(2) of cenvat rules 2001. in this respect, it is worthwhile to refer to the decision of the hon' ..... rule, notification or order, as the case may be, had not been amended, repealed, superseded or rescinded."8. therefore, when the provision contained in the central excise act itself viz., section 38 a specifically stipulates as to the applicability of the provisions as they were prevailing on the relevant date, there was no scope to invoke section 21 ..... components, spares and accessories, refractories and refractory materials and goods falling under heading no.68.02 and sub-heading no.6801.10 of the first schedule to the tariff act are in the possession and use of the manufacturer of final products in such subsequent year."7. the assessment year was 2001-2002. therefore, we are concerned with .....

Somasundaram Corporation (Pvt.) Ltd,. Owners of Somasundaram Super Spi ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1999(2)CTC364; (2000)ILLJ340Mad

..... competence of kerala state legislature to enact the legislation. it was urged . that in view of the declaration made in section 2 of the tea act, 1853. tea was a controlled industry and, therefore, the state legislature was denuded of any power to deal with the industry. it was further contended that the plantation required extensive ..... land and that resumption of land by the impugned legislation would directly and adversely affect the control taken over by the union and, therefore, the state legislature was incompetent to enact the impugned legislation. this contention was repelled holding that the impugned legislation ..... avergal v. the state of tamil nadu, 1985 wlr 1 is a judgment where the tamil nadu cultivating tenants (payment of fair rent) amendment act 17 of 1980 called in question. the act impugned therein does not even declare that the law enacted by the state is to give effect to the policy of the state .....