Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: delhi rent control act 1958 repealed section 56 power to make rules Court: chennai Page 14 of about 590 results (0.551 seconds)

Mahamani Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2000CriLJ1201

..... on the necessity for passing of the order. in short, it has to justify the order. this is because under section 14, the central government has a plenary control in case of both firstly where the order is passed by the empowered officer of the state government or where the order is passed by the state government itself. thus ..... in section 3(3), there was no infraction if the concerned authority was not in a position to report the order of the state government for reasons beyond his control making it impossible for the detaining authority to comply with section 3(3). the learned additional public prosecutor wants us to read this decision also in his favour, while ..... order. it is for this reason that a time limit is fixed so that the central government can effectively exercise its control. perhaps, it is because of this entitlement of the central government and the duty to act that time limit becomes more important. unless the central government is aware of the fact of the order and the grounds .....

Dyna Lamps and Glass Works Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [2003]115CompCas401(Mad); 2002(146)ELT287(Mad); [2004]52SCL186(Mad)

..... protection to the industries which are unable to repay the loans or advance or liability of like nature. in terms of the provision of import and export control act notifications have been issued and in terms of the said notification what has been undertaken by the petitioner is to discharge performance the obligation as per the ..... gujarat steel tubes company ltd. v. virchandbhai b. shah, reported in : the apex court held that filing of eviction petition on the ground of non payment of rent cannot be regarded as a suit filed forrecovery in nature and therefore section 22 will not get attracted.37. further, neither the respondent is a party to the ..... have a say when the steps for recovery of the amounts or other coercive proceedings are taken against sick industrial company which, during the relevant time, acts under the guidance/control or supervision of the board (bifr). any step for execution, distress or the like against the properties of the industrial company or other similar steps .....

P.N.A. Hyder Ali Vs. State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by Secretary to Governm ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1997(3)CTC486

..... by the learned counsel for the respondent to distinguish the judgment in jai prakash's case : 1993crilj303 , on the ground that the detention was under national security act, and there were more number of copies and relying on the decision in noorjehan sarver khan v. state of maharashtra .12. liberty of an individual being a ..... send one copy of the representation to the second respondent-central government, an authority competent to revoke the order of detention under section 11 of the cofeposa act in such circumstances.'discussing the factual aspects of the case, the court has further held thus:'....failure to send a copy of the representation to the second ..... detention are very vague and confusing and there is no material to indicate that he abetted the smuggling which offence is punishable under section 135 of the customs act. he further contended that five copies of the representation were given to the superintendent of central prison, madurai, with a request to forward the same to the .....

Crystal Trades, a Partnership Firm Rep. by One of Its Partners B. Laks ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2009(169)LC205(Madras)

..... international, kanpur at 24/164 and 24/164a, patkapur, kanpur. in his letter dated 27.09.2004 the dri, lucknow has informed that the premises (shops) were taken on rent from the house owner by one shri. mritunjay paras, who is the proprietor of both m/s.jyoti enterprises, kanpur and m/s. paras international, kanpur and he had left ..... licensing authority that is competent to cancel the licences on any of the grounds prescribed. no proceeding has been initiated under the provision of the foreign trade development and regulations act, 1992 or under the foreign trade regulation rules, 1993 for rendering the licences 'nonest', since in law those licences do not automatically become nonest but could be avoided ..... covered by a judgment of the hon'ble supreme court reported in 1997 (94) e.l.t. 289 (s.c.) (kaur & singh v. collector of central excise, new delhi) wherein, it has been held that show cause notice issued beyond the period of limitation of one year under section 11a of the central excise .....

M. Meyyappan Vs. Registrar of Companies

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [2002]112CompCas450(Mad)

..... march 31, 1995, to the cost auditor. the letter dated june 3, 1995, addressed to the director (cost), ministry of law, justice and company affairs, new delhi, shows that after highlighting the last date for submission of the records and report, they informed that during the relevant years there had been intermittent labour problem in the ..... the view that these decisions are applicable to our case.15. therefore, in the circumstances made out in this case, this court under section 633(2) of the act directs the registrar of companies to forebear from prosecuting the petitioner for the offence mentioned in the show-cause notice. accordingly, the company petition is allowed. no costs. ..... nos. 9, 12, 14, 15 and 17 of the typed set filed along with the company petition. these documents clearly show that the petitioner acted honestly and diligently and the delay in submitting the cost records is beyond his control.11. in this regard, it is relevant to refer to sub-section (2) of section 633 of the .....

S. Saran Vs. the Chairman and Managing Director (Cmd) National Aviatio ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2010)ILLJ552Mad

..... any time for unsatisfactory progress or behaviour or due to any act of omission or commission. it is also stated that his recruitment was at delhi and training was at hyderabad. he sought permission to attend the examination at delhi for which he was eligible for an sod ticket from hyderabad 'delhi' hyderabad. he requested on 21.4.2008 to travel via ..... the o/o.general manager (ops.), cte, hyderabad and also from the o/o. general manager (ops.), chennai citing the same reason of appearing for altp examination at delhi. you had fraudulently used one of the two sod tickets bearing no. 058/2300 410 520 for the travel of shri shanmugaiah, a friend of your father, by flight ..... stated about it. but, the more serious charge, as it is stated by the respondents, is about the issuance of sod tickets, namely while travelling from chennai to delhi, apart from the sod ticket which has been issued to him from hyderabad, he has also obtained another sod ticket at chennai and one of the tickets were allowed .....

S. Sivagnanam Vaidyar, Ravichandra Pharmacy Vs. the Government of Tami ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2006)4MLJ539

..... learned single judge has rejected the contention of all the petitioners that they have absolute right to manufacture ayurvedic preparations and no control can be exercised by the authorities under the prohibition act and disposed of the petitions with the certain directions.' the writ appeals were dismissed, confirming the order of the learned single judge. ..... writ petitions was to the effect that the persons who had taken necessary licence under the drugs and cosmetics act, 1940 were not required to take further licence under rule 11 of the tamil nadu spirituous preparations (control) rules, 1984. the division bench of this court in w.p. no. 1211 of 1995 and batch ..... the meaning of liquor as defined under section 3(9) of the tamil nadu prohibition act and so long as preparations contain alcohol, whether self-generated or not, licence as envisaged under rule 11 of the tamil nadu spirituous preparations (control) rules, 1984 has to be obtained. in the light of the aforesaid decisions the .....

Gnanawathi Vs. the Secretary and ors.

Court : Chennai

..... the sentence. (see gopal vinayak godse v. state of maharashtra2; state of m.p. v. ratan singh3; sohan lal v. asha ram4 and bhagirath v. delhi admn.5) 9.learned additional solicitor general has rightly pointed out that in view of the law laid down by this court a positive order of release has to ..... indefeasible right on a prisoner sentenced to transportation for life to an unconditional release on the expiry of a particular term including remissions. the rules under the prisons act do not substitute a lesser sentence for a sentence of transportation for life. the question of remission is exclusively within the province of the appropriate government; and ..... government, can be automatically treated as one for a definite period. no such provision is found in the indian penal code, code of criminal procedure or the prisons act. * * * a sentence of transportation for life or imprisonment for life must prima facie be treated as transportation or imprisonment for the whole of the remaining period .....

Gunalan Vs. S.Murugamanickam

Court : Chennai

..... tenant is to see that meticulously he adheres to the procedure contemplated under the tamil nadu buildings (lease and rent control) act for the purpose of paying the rent.13. in this case, voluntarily the tenant approached the rent controller and started depositing the rent. ex.b41 is worthy of being reproduced hereunder for ready reference. "details of items rs.734/21.2. ..... that the tenant did not pay the rent for one or two months. the extract would reveal that for even years ..... would show that there was no consistency in deposing the rent. 14. in this connection the honourable apex court s view is that if a tenant fails to adhere to the provisions of the rent control act, then wilful element on the part of the tenant in not paying the rent could be perceived.15. it is not the case here .....

Subhash Chandra Kapoor Soo of Parshotham Ram Kapoor, Vs. Inspector of ...

Court : Chennai

..... given to cbi, the nationalized crime bureau, the petitioner was arrested at cologne airport at germany, to whom a red corner notice was issued by the interpol, new delhi. thereafter, an affidavit was also filed by the superintendent of police, commercial crime investigation wing, in-charge of idol wing cid requesting the learned magistrate to permit ..... the same before the jurisdictional court. in fact, after production, the procedure to be followed by the magistrate is set out under section 7 of the extradition act. the act also provides for the release of persons arrested on bail under section 25. exception under which a fugitive criminal need not be surrendered or returned is set ..... exported any antique idols. what was exported by him was the brand new idols and after getting proper approval. reliance was placed upon section 25 of the evidence act to contend that no statement made by the accused before the police officer can be used in any manner.8. however, this court is not inclined to .....