Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: delhi rent control act 1958 repealed section 56 power to make rules Court: chennai Page 8 of about 590 results (0.179 seconds)

Nov 25 1993 (HC)

Justice S.T. Ramalingam Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Another

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1994Mad252; (1994)IMLJ260

..... courts must take greater interest in the proper functioning of the subordinate judiciary. inspection should not be a matter of casual attention. the constitution has vested the control of the subordinate judiciary under art. 235 in the high court as a whole and not its chief justice alone. every judge should, therefore, take adequate ..... e) dated november 4, 1986 saying, 'in respect of facilities for medical treatment and accommodation in hospitals -- in the case of judged of the high courts otherthan delhi and punjab & haryana high courts, the rules and provisions as applicable to a cabinet minister of the state government in which the principal seat of the high court ..... an amendment, repealing rule 2-b, which had provided that the value of free furnishing including electrical appliances provided free of rent in an official residence allotted under section 22-a of the act, in the case of the chief justice, would be rupees five thousand more than the scale provided to a cabinet minister .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 21 1949 (PC)

M.R.S. Mani Vs. the District Magistrate and the Superintendent, Centra ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1949)2MLJ310

..... he was a person of 'hostile associations' within the meaning of clause (1-a) of the regulation and that by reason thereof, it was necessary to exercise control over him. by clause (3) of the regulation the detenu was given a right of appeal to an advisory committee constituted under the 'regulation on the lines of ..... power of detention and passing an initial order therefore, the provincial government or its duly empowered delegate, must be satisfied that a person is acting or about to act or likely to act in a manner prejudicial to public safety or the maintenance of public order. this is a fundamental requisite essential to give jurisdiction to the ..... in the proceedings connected with such a detention. (1) satisfaction of the provincial government or its delegate empowered unser section 15, that a person is acting or about to act or likely to act in any manner' prejudicial to public safety or the maintenance of public order [section 2(i)]. (2) order directing the detention of such a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 06 1969 (HC)

State of Madras Represented by the Collector of Madras and ors. Vs. T. ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1970Mad27; (1969)2MLJ443

..... the operation of any particular enactment may, be found in a different enactment covering the same field. in so far as the madras city tenants protection act provides for the control over the eviction of cultivating tenants, though the relevant section excluding its operation in the case of lands belonging to certain specified bodies are concerned does ..... not any 'provision, restriction, condition or limitation over' in the relevant document ex. a-1 which according to its tenor entitles the respondents to hold the lands rent-free, but the absolute character of the interest conveyed under ex. a and therefore, section 3 does not in terms apply. the deed in that case conveyed the ..... from time to time and finally, at the beginning of 1953, the timber merchants were informed that the lease would be renewed only on condition of their paying a rent of rs. 50 per ground, though the standing committee of the corporation itself had suggested only rs. 35 per ground, posman hajee and co. and messrs. s .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 27 1994 (HC)

Malleswara Finance and Investments Co. P. Ltd. Vs. Company Law Board a ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1995]82CompCas836(Mad)

..... export house pvt. ltd., : [1985]2scr899 , the question that came up for consideration was, whether under the delhi rent control act, the tenant was liable to be put on notice under the relevant section of the act. as per the said act, once a limited tenancy is properly created under section 21, the order for putting the landlord in vacant possession of ..... only deal with the conduct of a corporate management towards its own shareholders. consequently, the company law board forum cannot judicially treat a malice where the remote controllers acting through a puppet management affect the rights at not just the shareholders of the concerned corporate body but the shareholders and finally of the ultimate shareholders. the plaintiffs ..... . a. no. 743 of 1993 and c. m. a. no. 875 of 1994. - both these appeals under section 10f of the companies act arise out of the order passed by the company law board, new delhi, in c. p. no. 29 of 1992. 68. c. m. a. no. 743 of 1993 is filed by respondents nos. 1 to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 12 1986 (HC)

N.B. Namazi Vs. Central Chinmaya Mission Trust

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1988Mad84; (1987)IIMLJ317

..... property and the plaintiff must see that some thing was done about this delayed transaction. the defendant also stated that a fair rent application should be filed before the rent controller for fixation of fair rent as the rent that was paid was very nominal. it was replied by the plaintiff under ex. p. 17, that every endeavor was taken ..... was adequate. therefore, the inadequacy of the price cannot be pressed into service. this is beside the scope of explanation 1 to sec. 20 of the specific relief act, where it is stated that inadequacy of consideration shall not constitute an unfair advantage. mr. c. ramakrishnan, is therefore, right in his submission that on the ..... performance should be refused on equitable grounds.secondly it is urged that this is a case of contingent contract falling under sec. 30 of the indian contract act, because it was subject to obtaining exemption from stamp duty. when the plaintiff had been clearly informed that the exemption had been denied to him on 341980 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 05 2008 (HC)

The Executive Engineer (Distribution), Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Vs ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR2008Mad148; (2008)2MLJ812

..... .p. 4347/2006 before this courtfor a writ of mandamus, to direct theauthorities to follow the provisions ofsection 126 of the electricity act, 2003 inthe enquiry.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------10. from the above particulars gathered from the materials placed on record, this court is able to assess that ..... the electricity department has initiated the proceedings contemplated under the old act, which was ruling the roost at that time, by issuing show-cause notices and the assessments orders immediately after detecting the alleged theft ..... low tensionservice, assessment can bemade for a period of sixmonths.---------------------------------------------------------------------------------17. but from a reading of section 185(2)(a) of the electricity act 2003, all the actions taken or purported to have been done or taken including any rule, notification, inspection, order or notice made .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 23 1962 (HC)

R. Rama Subbarayalu Reddiar Vs. Rengammal

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1962Mad450

..... special order authorise any subordinate judge to take cognizance of, or any district judge to transfer to any subordinate judge under his control any proceeding under the indian succession act, 1925, which cannot be disposed of by the district delegate'.the terms of the section are clear. it authorises a ..... even assuming that the high court issues a notification under its powers authorising subordinate judges to dispose of applications under part x of the succession act and the government authorises district munsif to grant succession certificate in respect of the same subject matter, there can be to conflict as under s ..... subordinate judge or munsif under his administrative control any contentious proceeding under the indian succession act, 1865 and probate. and administration act, 1881. there was a similar legislative pro-vision in the punjab civil courts act, 1918; the central provinces courts act. 1917 and the bombay civil courts act, 1869, the respective statutory provisions being .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 12 1986 (HC)

N.B. Namazi Vs. Central Chinmaya Mission Trust, by Its Trustee, Mrs. L ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1987)2MLJ317

..... the property and the plaintiff must see that something was done about this delayed transaction. the defendant also stated that a fair rent application should be filed before the rent controller for fixation of fair rent as the rent that was paid was very nominal. it was replied by the plaintiff under ex. p17, that every endeavour was taken to ..... date was adequate. therefore the inadequacy of the price cannot be pressed into service. this is beside the scope of explanation 1 to section 20 of the specific relief act, where it is stated that inadequacy of consideration shall not constitute an unfair advantage. mr. c. ramakrishnan, is, therefore, right in his submission that on the ..... by the assistant commissioner of urban land tax, is to the effect that there is no vacant land in excess of the ceiling limit as per the new act. this is the communication addressed to the appellant-defendant. on 17th august, 1978 under ex. p12, the appellant-defendant wrote to the respondent-plaintiff that he .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 30 1970 (HC)

P. Shankar Rao Vs. the Government of India, Represented by the Home Se ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1971)1MLJ302

..... the appeal. there was no further appeal and by an order dated 23rd july, 1969 the petitioner was reinstated in the i.a.s. when he was working as accommodation controller, the impugned order was served on him on 12th august, 1969.rule 16, so far as it is relevant, may now be quoted:rule 16(1) : a member ..... in 1942 and was promoted to the indian administrative service in 1955. he served as collector of the nilgiris district. thereafter he was transferred and was, working as accommodation controller. he was then served with ten charges arising mainly out of his conduct when he was working as collector of the nilgiris. he was suspended pending enquiry. a board ..... purchaser for arrears of rent. the division bench also referred to the report of the tahsildar that a re sale might fetch even a lower price in the same way as it happened in another case. the bench then observed:in the above circumstances, one can come to the conclusion that the board, of enquiry was acting only on mere suspicions .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 25 1962 (HC)

R. Rama Subbarayalu Reddiar Vs. Rengammal

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1962)2MLJ318

..... special order authorise any subordinate judge to take cognizance of, or any district judge to transfer to any subordinate judge under his control any proceeding under the indian succession act, 1925, which cannot be disposed of by the district delegates.the terms of the section are clear. it authorises a ..... was rightly decided. further we accept with great respect the observations contained in that judgment regarding the scope of section 29(1) of the madras civil courts act. it follows that the decision in francis v. varghese : (1956)2mlj288 , should be overruled. that decision does not keep alive the distinction between a ..... subordinate judge or munsif under his administrative control any contentious proceeding under the indian succession act, 1865 and probate and administration act, 1881. there was a similar legislative provision in the punjab civil courts act, 1918, the central provinces courts' act, 1917 and the bombay civil courts act, 1869, the respective statutory provisions being .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //