Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: delhi rent control act 1958 repealed schedule iii the third schedule Page 1 of about 2,135 results (0.206 seconds)

Jackson Co-operative Credit Society Limited Vs. Co-operative Banks and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1989SC1398; (1989)91BOMLR162; (1989)2CompLJ38(SC); [1989(58)FLR906]; JT1989(2)SC31; (1989)ILLJ563SC; 1989(1)SCALE965; (1989)3SCC89; [1989]2SCR266; 1989(2)LC249(SC)

..... employer in the third schedule.the employer in question being a co-operative society, it is item (4) of the third schedule to the bonus act that is applicable. that reads:------------------------------------------------------------------------------ item no. category of employer further sums to be deducted ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ (1) (2) (3) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4. ..... any provisions of law relating to co-operative societies are also deductible. the expression 'capital' is not defined under the bonus act. it must, therefore, be understood in the sense in which that expression is generally understood that means all amounts which are ..... with the previous sanction of the state government, be used in part for some public purpose likely to promote the objects of this act, or for some such purpose of the state, or of local interest:provided that, the registrar may, having regard to the .....

Vinod Kumar Vs. Ashok Kumar Gandhi

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the learned counsel for the parties in detail, we may first notice the provisions of section 14 of delhi rent control act, 1958 as enacted. the delhi rent control act, 1958 had been enacted to provide for the regulation of rents, repairs and maintenance and evictions relating to premises and of rates of hotels and lodging houses in the ..... was a case where restriction on rights of heir of statutory tenant of residential premises placed by explanation to section 2(l)(iii) of delhi rent control act as introduced act 18 of 1976 while no restrictions were placed on tenants of commercial premises where challenge on the ground of violation of article 14 and ..... the first time, sought to be taken away by 1956 amendment which amendment was struck down by this court. those cases were not relevant for delhi rent control act. the tenants occupying non-residential premises are dependent on their livelihood. applying summary procedure as prescribed under section 25b brings hardship in denying them protection .....

Saraswati Dalmia Vs. Bennett Coleman and Co. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 46(1992)DLT191

..... shaw brothers-respondents criminal appeal no. 4927 of 1991 [arising out of special leave petition (e) no. 4517 of 1991] decided on 13-12-1991 (i) delhi rent control act, 1958-section 21 -limited period tenancy -scope of section-meaning of fraud. held (per thommen, j.) what the section postulates is the bona fide belief of an ..... section 14(1)(k) of the delhi rent control act on the ground that the landlord requires the premises for the purpose of rebuilding and making substantial alterations which cannot be carried out without the premises being ..... defend is that earlier in 1985. the petitioner had filed a petition for eviction of the respondent under section 14(1)(a) & (i) of the delhi rent control act and there was no mention of the bonafide requirement. that petition was got dismissed as withdrawn in the year 1989. again the petitioner filed a petition under .....

Ramesh Birch and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1988P& H281

..... ejectment of the petitioners in the writ petition, in the court of the rent controller, union territory, chandigarh. the petitioners (who are the tenants), therefore, have filed this writ petition questioning the constitutional validity of the notification made under s. 87 extending the amending act no. 2 of 1985 to the union territory of chandigarh.8. the ..... to abdication of power, none i of these decisions have held that provisions like s. 87, or those that were considered an held valid in re, delhi laws act case (supra), were treated as impermissible delegation of legislative power. all the decisions have held that provision like s. 87 was intra vires an does not ..... and better. it is commonsense that the legislature must have intended to empower the central. government to extend the fuller and better law from the provinces to delhi even if an, older inadequate law on the same subject existed there. secondly, such a restriction would have been unworkable. it would be impossible to decide .....

Ashoka Kumar Thakur Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors. (Obc Judgment)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2008(56)BLJR1292; 2008(3)CTC97; [2008(3)JCR176(SC)]; JT2008(5)SC1; (2008)3MLJ1105(SC); 2008(5)SCALE1; (2008)6SCC1; 2008AIRSCW2899; 2008(3)Supreme331; 2008(2)LH(SC)1534

..... obstante clauses in the earlier law, we have come to the conclusion that the provisions of section 14a and chapter iiia of the rent control act must prevail over those contained in sections 19 and 39 of the slum clearance act. 22. in j.k. cotton spinning and weaving co. ltd. v. state of u.p. and anr. : (1961)illj540sc it was ..... case at page 615.23. the argument of implied repeal has also no substance in it because our reason for according priority to the provisions of the delhi rent act is not that the slum clearance act stands impliedly repealed protanto. bearing in mind the language of the two laws, their object and purpose, and the fact that one of them is ..... if the language of the law is obscure and ambiguous. but, it must be stated that we have referred to the object of the provisions newly introduced into the delhi rent act in 1975 not for seeking light from it for resolving in ambiguity, for there is none, but for a different purpose altogether. when two or more laws operate in .....

NaraIn Khamman Vs. Parduman Kumar Jain

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1985SC4; 1984(2)SCALE650; (1985)1SCC1; [1985]1SCR1025; 1985(17)LC422(SC)

..... his wife or dependent child should be in occupation of the accommodation allotted to him on the date when he files an eviction application under section 14a(1) of the delhi rent control act, 1958, to recover possession of the residential premises which he so owns and which has been let by him.(2) if such person has, however, other premises which he owns ..... (gazette of india extraordinary, part ii, section 2 dated january 19, 1976, p. 410) which when enacted became the delhi rent control (amendment) act, 1976. the said statement of objects and reasons is as follows :-there has been a persistent demand for amendments to the delhi rent control act, 1958 with a view to conferring a right of tenancy on certain heirs/successors of a deceased statutory tenant .....

U.P. State Road Transport Corporation, Lucknow Vs. State Transport App ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1975All154

..... to ply its vehicles on that route. the respondents could not, therefore, claim any right to obtain permit under chapter iv of the motor vehicles act on meerut-delhi route merely on the ground that the notification dated 12-2-1951 could not be enforced prior to 18-6-1951. even if the respondents' contention ..... no merit in this contention.29. to sum up, my conclusions are that the notification dated 12th february, 1951, was validated by the 1955 act and the meerut-delhi route continued to be a notified route with the result no private operator could legally obtain any permit on that route. the transport authorities, namely the ..... india caterers (p.) ltd. v. state of punjab (air 1967 sc 1581) had declared the punjab public premises and land (eviction and rent recovery) act, 1959, void as section 5 of that act, practised discrimination and was thus violative of article 14 of the constitution. subsequently, the legislature enacted the public premises (eviction of unauthorised occupants .....

Indian Chemical and Pharmaceutical Works Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1966SC713; [1966]2SCR110

..... the appellant could be asked to take out a licence and pay excise duty on the manufacture thereof, even though chloral hydrate may be a drug which is controlled under the drug act. 12. the case of the state government in this connection is that chloral hydrate is a narcotic drug or a narcotic within the meaning of entry 51 of list ..... entry 51 of list ii, which provides for imposition of duties of excise on such drugs. if a substance is a narcotic drug, it is liable to be controlled under the drugs act as a drug. but at the same time it is liable to duties of excise under entry 51 of list ii, and such duties can be imposed only by ..... , must be deemed to have been repealed. we are of opinion that there is no force in this argument either. the drugs act is mainly concerned with standard and quality of drugs manufactured in this country and therefore controls the manufacture, sale and distribution of drugs. it has nothing to do with duties of excise and with their imposition on narcotics and .....

Ramesh Birch and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1990SC560; JT1989(2)SC483; 1989Supp(1)SCC430; [1989]2SCR629

..... government could extend to the union territory any law in force in any part of india. for instance, it could be the rent control act in force in punjab or the rent control act in operation in a distant state like the state of tamil nadu. it could perhaps extend to the union territory some provisions of ..... from the date on which the united provinces (temporary) control of rent and eviction act, 1947, is extended by notification under section 3 of the cantonments (extension of rent control laws) act, 1957 to the cantonments in uttar pradesh, the uttar pradesh cantonments (control of rent and eviction) act, 1952 (act 10 of 1952) shall stand repealed.in other words, ..... rent control legislation in one state side by side with certain other provisions of legislations in force in any other state or states and thus enforce a law which would be an 'amalgam' of various statutory provisions in force in various parts of the country. though a concession against this possibility was made in delhi laws act .....

New Woodlands Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. and Mr. Chandrakant T. ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2006(5)BomCR74

..... demolish and to construct the new building with a floor space index (fsi) of 2.5 is given under the development control regulation (dcr) 33(7) framed under the maharashtra regional and town planning act (mrtp act). this high fsi is permitted with a view to accommodate the old tenants/occupiers and under clause 13 of appendix ..... connections or may not require separate toilets, kitchens or bed-rooms. respondents rely upon notices issued by the municipal corporation to some of the occupants and their rent receipts. the housing board engineer has stated that he has verified their presence and they have given written consent to the development. the photographs of the persons ..... are large number of disputed facts involved in the present matter. the parties have their own say with respect to them. thus, the interveners rely upon their rent receipts, whereas mr.divan has his comments on their format and serial numbers and chronology as against those of the earlier tenants. in a situation like this, .....