Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR1993SC2335; JT1993(4)SC308; 1993LabIC2035; (1994)ILLJ94SC; 1993(3)SCALE260; (1993)3SCC723; [1993]Supp1SCR339
..... of his respective job and the seniority, pay, allowances and other benefits including his power to admit, operate and allocate beds to the patients under his control is fully protected.(vii) the grievance that the hierarchy is created for public health-cum-administration unit to protect the seniority and status of those who earlier ..... maintained. (vi) those who held teaching posts in the former wbhs have been transferred to such non-teaching hospitals where they are placed to work under the control of their junior officers appointed as superintendents of the said hospitals. (vii) whereas under new wbhs, the hierarchy is created for public health-cum-administration unit to ..... 11 states the consequences should a doctor opt for private practice like a deduction of 50 per cent of salary, denial of house rent allowance etc.58. the above is the analysis of the act and the rules. mr. soli j. sorabjee argued that without the constitution of the west bengal health service, the option available under .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad
Reported in : (2007)288ITR226(Hyd.)
..... the provisions of section 14a and chapter iia of the rent control act must prevail over those contained in sections 19 and 39 of the slum clearance act.this proposition was relied upon for submitting that the finance acts being subsequent laws, as section 158ba(1) was introduced by the finance act, 1995, whereas the levy of surcharge was introduced by ..... held as follows: the argument of implied repeal has also no substance in it because our reason for according priority to the provisions of the delhi rent act is not that the slum clearance act stands impliedly repealed pro tanto. bearing in mind the language of the two laws, their object and purpose, and the fact that one of ..... assessee, which are as under: (a) principal officer, builcon towers (p) ltd. v. acit (2000) 113 taxman 74 (cal.) there is however, another decision of the delhi bench of the tribunal in friends overseas (p) ltd. v. dcit (2001) 73 ttj 367 (del.), which is to the contrary effect. in that decision, the tribunal observed .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR2002KAR2304; 2003(3)KarLJ505
..... stores case, supra, has any relevance to the issue. in that case the supreme court considered section 57 relating to repeal in delhi rent control act, 1958. the said section reads as follows:'57(1) the delhi and ajmer rent control act, 1952, insofar as it is applicable to the union territory of delhi, is hereby repealed.(2) notwithstanding such repeal, all suits and other proceedings under the said ..... act pending at the commencement of this act before any court or other authority shall be continued and disposed of in accordance with the provisions .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
Reported in : AIR1989MP279; 1988MPLJ301
..... category iii(b). since the named arbitrator was not traceable, the petitioner filed a fresh petition under section 5/11 of the arbitration act which was registered as cmp no. 24/81. the delhi high court by order dt. 12-11-1984 referred the dispute to shri v. d. mishra, ex-chief justice of himachal pradesh ..... varieties of cloth and 'yarn, and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto which gives effect to the policy of the state towards securing the ownership and control of the material resorouces of the community and comes under the protective umbrella of article 31c and therefore, cannot be challenged on the ground of violation of the ..... though the petitioner objected that the present respondent 2 had no locus standi to intervene as no claim has been preferred by the petitioner against the corporation. the delhi high court held that hind cycles ltd, as a company, is not nationalised but only its two undertakings manufacturing bicycles and accessories. section 5{1) recognises .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
Reported in : [1973]31STC575(MP)
..... the position, whenever a miller purchases groundnut, the turnover relating to that purchase becomes exigible to tax subject to such exemptions as may be given under the act. this means that as soon as a first miller purchases groundnut, the turnover relating to that purchase-the question of exemption apart-becomes liable to tax. this ..... manufacture ofand the like or goods for sale) orin lubrication and to those dealersvolatile oils used who have no regis-chiefly in medicines, tration certificateperfumes, cosmetics under this act.and the like.thus, under section 6, as it originally stood, with schedule ii, both the conditions regarding the tax not being more than 2 per cent. ..... seeds can be recovered from him. the objection was overruled by the assessing authority on the ground that it had no jurisdiction to decide the vires of the act under which it was constituted. the assessee has, therefore, filed the present petition with a prayer that the assessment proceedings be quashed.2. article 286(3 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
Reported in : [2004]121CompCas374(Bom); [2004]56SCL665(Bom)
..... the effect of repealing,by implication, an existing law could not bedelegated in view of the majority decision in reart l43 constitution of india and delhi laws act(l9l2) etc. air 1951 sc 332 wherein it was heldthat to repeal or abrogate an existing law is theexercise of the legislative power. the ..... conditions shall always becomplied with and shall not be violated, includinginter alia that there shall be a cap of 49% offoreign equity and the management control of thecompany shall remain with the indian shareholders.48. further the guidelines dated3l.7.l997 issued by the central government provideas follows:'(iii) preference ..... the courtshould consider business realities. he contendedthat a large number of companies are conductingtheir business through subsidiaries and subsidiarycompanies have practically no say and entirebusiness is controlled by the holding company and,therefore, they must be treated as one entity. itwas submitted by the learned counsel that modernlaw has laid to rest .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : AIR1994Delhi112; 51(1993)DLT334; 1993(27)DRJ144
..... deal with procedure for assessing any property. section 67a was inserted .w.e.f. 1 april 1988. (10) after the amendments to the delhi rent control act, dmc act and pm act as applicable to delhi, the municipal authorities, namely, mcd and ndmc, issued notices for revision of rateable value, or annual value, as the case may be, ..... anddr.balbirsingh'scase : [1985]152itr388(sc) . (2) all these challenges, in effect, have been made to contend that amendment made in 1988 to the delhi rent control act has no bearing for arriving at the rateable value/ annual value of the properties as he thertofore done and principles laid down by the two judgments of the supreme ..... with respect to any land or building the standard rent of which has been fixed under the delhi and ajmer rent control act, 1952, rateable value thereof shall not exceed the annual amount of the standard rent so fixed. the necessary consequence of the amendment of the delhi rent control act would prima facie be that the premises which are .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 155(2008)DLT440
..... sections 6a and 8 of the delhi rent control act, 1958 is admitted. the increase of 10% in the last paid rent makes it rs. 3,850 per month which excludes applicability of the delhi rent control act, 1958 to the suit premises. in other words, the defendants cannot claim any protection of the delhi rent control act when the rent is beyond rs. 3,500 ..... has been replied to by the respondent. the only real defence raised in the written statement is the protection under delhi rent control act, 1958 ('the said act' for short) on account of the fact that the rent was rs. 3,500/- per month and thus the jurisdiction of the civil court is barred as per the ..... the tenant lost the protection of the delhi rent control act. section 6a and section 8 reads as under:6-a. revision of rent - notwithstanding anything contained in this act, the standard rent, or where no standard rent is fixed under the provisions of this act in respect of any premises, the rent agreed upon between the landlord and the tenant .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : 2009(14)SCALE672; 2010(1)LC239(SC)
..... as follows in a nutshell:the landlord/appellant filed an eviction petition under section 14(1)(e) of the delhi rent control act, 1958 (in short 'the rent act') before the rent controller, delhi for eviction of the tenant/respondent from no. 1-c/46, ramesh nagar, namdhari colony, new delhi (in short 'the tenanted premises'). after filing of the eviction proceeding, summons was issued in compliance with section 25 ..... reason for us not to rely on the decision of prakash h. jain (supra), only because that decision was rendered under the maharashtra rent control act, whereas the present case has been filed under the delhi rent control act, but on comparing the aforesaid two acts and in view of the observations and principles laid down by this court in prakash h. jain (supra), as noted hereinearlier, we .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 16(1979)DLT266; ILR1979Delhi601; 1979RLR497
..... cantonment area does not arise. it had been pointed out before prithviraj, j (para 35 on p. 390 of the 2nd 1976-1 delhi) that when it became necessary to extend rent control legislation this was done by a special enactment instead of a mere extension, by notification, of the law on the subject which was in ..... creation of slums. this leads the government to think seriously of planning the growth of the city. 1955 town planning organisation (t.p.o.) set up, delhi (control of building operations) act, 1955 passed. 1956 the t.p.o. prepares an interim general plan (i.g.p.). in pursuance thereof about 3,000 acres of land were ..... amenities to, the troops.'. the land of the petitioner was claimed by the custodian of evacuee property under the provisions of the administration of evacuee act property act/displaced persons (compensation) act. the petitioner thereupon entered into a litigation which lasted for about 15 years and ultimately in 1972 got the land released from the custodian and got .....
Tag this Judgment!