Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: delhi rent control act 1958 repealed schedule iii the third schedule Page 10 of about 2,135 results (0.144 seconds)

May 07 1982 (HC)

Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. and Others Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [1983]53CompCas409(Delhi); (1983)36CTR(Del)153; ILR1983Delhi856; [1983]141ITR174(Delhi)

..... ii) in the reports presented to the shareholders for the years 1975 and 1976, the directors have ascribed the poor performance to the mechanism of price control which does not take into account cost increases, and also sluggishness in demand for tractors principally because of the stringent credit restrictions brought into force by the ..... ltd. v. union of india, c.w.p. 754 of 1979 decide on march 13, 1980, by a division bench of this court : [1983]141itr168(delhi) . there, the scheme of amalgamation provided for the issue of shares by the amalgamated company to the shareholders of the amalgamating company is the ratio of 1 : ..... of agricultural tractors and agricultural implements. itci was manufacturing agricultural tractors and allied agricultural implements which were and are an essential commodity under the essential commodities act, 1955. 3. itci commenced production within three years of its incorporation and from then onwards was carrying on the business of manufacture and sale of .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 01 1986 (HC)

i.T.C. Ltd. and Another Vs. Union of India and Anothers

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1987(30)ELT321(Del)

..... to their consumers. the correctness and validity of these instructions came up for consideration of this court in modi rubber v. board of central excise & customs (2nd 1978-2 delhi 352) = 1978 e.l.t. 127 (del.) in the context of notification no. 198/76, dated 16-6-1976 referred to above. the court by its judgment ..... in case, however, there is no such exemption the reduction will be to the extent of excise duty computed with reference to the rate specified in the act or central act in respect of such goods. 26. the last few words of the second para of the explanationn which have been underlined above also took care of the third ..... livable under any special enactment, the additional duty livable under a fiance act or an auxiliary duty levied under any statute though, earlier, in the context of a different enactment, contrary views had been expressed by the court in associated cements v. director of customs : [1972]84itr811(delhi) and madras high court in seshasayee paper & boards ltd. v. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 23 1976 (HC)

Ganga Pershad Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1977Delhi111

..... ganga pershad was appointed as secretary of the notified area committee, narela on january 7, 1956. on april 7, 1958, the municipal corporation of delhi was established by the delhi municipal corporation act. 1957 (the act). by s. 511 the functions of narcia notified area committee were taken over by the corporation. (3) on october 14, 1960, the petitioner ..... in, the unamended service regulations of 1959. that makes all the difference. (19) reg. 2(b)(iii) is the definition clause and will thereforee in my view control reg. 4. this means that even if the conduct rules of 1955 are repealed they will continue to govern, the municipal employees unless the definition clause is amended ..... time.'(28) it must not be forgotten that the collocation of paitieular words may be the same but the context differs. here reg. 2(b)(iii) is a controlling regulation. it governs reg. 4, as i have said. the conduct rules of 1955 may be changed, amended and repealed by the central government but their independent .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 17 1980 (HC)

Central Wines Vs. Special Commercial Tax Officer, Intelligence, Hydera ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : [1982]49STC83(AP)

..... to purchase tax or sales tax as the case may be.' 51. in the course of the judgment, their lordships observed : 'the limitations under the cement control act and the orders made thereunder on the normal rights of dealers and consumers to supply and obtain the goods, the obligations imposed on the parties and the penalties ..... enactment to expressly pass on the tax to the purchaser. we are unable to agree for the simple reason that as laid down by the supreme court in delhi cloth and general mills company limited v. commissioner of sales tax : air1971sc2216 , the burden of tax is imposed by the statute and not regulated by contract. ..... 79(3) of the rules framed thereunder cannot also be included in the turnover of purchases. reiterating the principles laid down in george oakes case : [1962]2scr570 and delhi cloth and general mills company limited v. commissioner of sales tax, indore : air1971sc2216 his lordship emphasised the distinction in the following words : '...... where a dealer is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 04 2008 (HC)

National Ability S.A. Vs. Tinna Oil and Chemicals Ltd. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2008(3)ARBLR37(Delhi); 2008(105)DRJ446

..... of the respondent no. 1 were to be continued and enforced by or against the respondent no. 2 only. a petition under section 391 of the companies act was also filed in the delhi high court being c.p. no. 303/1997 for seeking the mandatory approval of this court to the scheme of arrangement. with effect from the date ..... in the ministry of affairs in the republic of panama. by this power of attorney, act of filing the present petition is duly ratified and confirmed. this act indicates the objection of the respondents. at this stage, i may quote from the judgment of this court in delhi lotteries v. rajesh aggarwal and ors. : air1998delhi332 , wherein such a contention was brushed ..... of arrangement, i.e. 1.4.1997, all assets and liabilities of 'spin off division' were to vest in the respondent no. 2, without any further act, deed or thing .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 05 2002 (HC)

Mercury Press Vs. Ameen Shacoor and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2002KAR2304; 2003(3)KarLJ505

..... stores case, supra, has any relevance to the issue. in that case the supreme court considered section 57 relating to repeal in delhi rent control act, 1958. the said section reads as follows:'57(1) the delhi and ajmer rent control act, 1952, insofar as it is applicable to the union territory of delhi, is hereby repealed.(2) notwithstanding such repeal, all suits and other proceedings under the said ..... act pending at the commencement of this act before any court or other authority shall be continued and disposed of in accordance with the provisions .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 10 1970 (SC)

Rustom Cavasjee Cooper Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1970SC564; [1970]40CompCas325(SC); (1970)1SCC248; [1970]3SCR530

..... reasonably be regarded as payment of compensation having regard to the conditions prevailing in the money market. capitalization of annual rent which is generally based on controlled rent under some state acts at rates pegged down to the rates prevailing in 1940 and on the footing that investment in buildings yields 8-1/3% return furnishes a wholly misleading ..... an abuse of power and the differences would have no relation to the object. in the case of the board of trustees, ayurvedic and unani tibia college, delhi v. the state of delhi and anr. [1962] supp. 1 s.c.r. 156 the court supported legislation on a reasonable ground that the case of tibia college [1962] supp. ..... except to the extent i have indicated.the view expressed in a.k. gopalan's case : 1950crilj1383 was reaffirmed in ram singh and ors. v. the state of delhi : [1951]2scr451 .62. the principle underlying the judgment of the majority was extended to the protection of the freedom in respect of property, and it was held that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 20 1988 (SC)

Accountant and Secretarial Services Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of In ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1988SC1708; JT1988(3)SC78; 1988(2)SCALE53; (1988)4SCC324; [1988]Supp1SCR493; 1988(2)LC471(SC)

..... , : [1981]1scr498 where this court held that the provisions of the 1971 act will prevail against the provisions of the delhi rent control act, 1956 and the delhi slum areas (improvement & clearance) act, 1956 on the grounds that it was both a later act and a special act. he submitted that the decision in the case is the subject matter of reference ..... in this case was whether, in respect of a tenancy governed by tamil nadu buildings (lease and rent control) act, it was necessary for the landlord to issue a notice under section 106 of the transfer of property act terminating the tenancy before he could obtain an order of eviction against the tenant. this question was answered ..... judges of this court and was rendered on an appeal from the calcutta case cited earlier. the question for consideration was whether the act of a rent controller in fixing fair rent for certain premises within the cantonment area of barrackpore was valid. the claim of the respondent-owner was that the appellant was not .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 10 1960 (HC)

Durga Parshad Vs. Custodian of Evacuee Property 'P' Block, New Delhi a ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1960P& H341

..... the sale.(4) before stating the first point, which relates to the constitutionality of the east punjab evacuees (administration of property) act, 1947 (to be referred to as the act of 1947), which was extended to delhi and the administration of evacuee property (chief commissioners' provinces) ordinance, 1949 (to be referred to as ordinance no. xii), ..... to the following effect:--'land, that is to say, rights in or over land, land tenures, including the relation of landlord and tenant, and the collection of rents; transfer, alienation and devolution of agricultural land; land improvement and agricultural loans; colonization; court of wards; encumbered and attached estates; treasure trove'.it is further suggested ..... the previous operation of the ordinance.(5) in execution first appeal no. 54 of 1952 the notification whereby the custodian assumed possession and control of the property in dispute was made on 6th may 1949 and this was apparently done under sub-section (1) of section 6 of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 29 2002 (HC)

Shreeprakash Shivram Poddar Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2002(3)ALLMR124; 2002(3)BomCR655

..... in : air1970sc794 , the apex court observed that a compromise de hors grounds for eviction was arrived at between the parties under section 13 of the delhi and ajmer rent control act. a decree in terms thereof was passed. the possession was not delivered and execution was laid. it was held that the decree was nullity and, therefore ..... i to the petition. the petitioner has also sought a declaration that the provisions of the bombay rents, hotel and lodging house rates control act, the bombay land requisition act and the bombay government premises (eviction) (amendment) act, 1996 (the maharashtra act xvi of 1997) and/or the ordinance dated 25th december, 1997, published in the maharashtra government ..... 1946 and the order under rule 81(2) of the rules was passed in 1946, the bombay rents, hotel and lodging house rates (control) act, 1944 was in force (for short, 'act of 1944'). section 10 of the act of 1944 provided creation of sub-tenancy by the tenant of any portion of his premises to the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //