Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: dehra dun act 1871 Sorted by: old Court: rajasthan jodhpur Page 7 of about 483 results (0.113 seconds)

Aug 29 2013 (HC)

M/S Indian Gum Industries Ltd Vs. Asst. Commissioner, Ct

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... cancellation of registration must be rejected. to accept it would be to nullify the provisions of the statute which entitle persons dealing with registered dealers to act upon the strength of registration certificates. for authenticating his submissions on this proposition, the learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on a decision ..... and exposing falsehood. as in that case the assessing officer refused to summon the said person for cross-examination, the supreme court held that the act of the assessing officer in refusing to summon the said person for cross-examination by the assessee clearly constituted infraction of the right conferred on the ..... respondents. *** reportable by the court: all these six revision petitions are preferred by the petitioner-assessee under section 86 of the rajasthan sales tax act 1994 (for short, the act of 1994) against the impugned judgment/order dated 20th of september 2002, passed by the learned tax board, ajmer, whereby three appeals filed by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 29 2013 (HC)

M/S Indian Gum Industries Ltd Vs. Asst.Commissioner,ct

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... cancellation of registration must be rejected. to accept it would be to nullify the provisions of the statute which entitle persons dealing with registered dealers to act upon the strength of registration certificates. for authenticating his submissions on this proposition, the learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on a decision ..... and exposing falsehood. as in that case the assessing officer refused to summon the said person for cross-examination, the supreme court held that the act of the assessing officer in refusing to summon the said person for cross-examination by the assessee clearly constituted infraction of the right conferred on the ..... respondents. *** reportable by the court: all these six revision petitions are preferred by the petitioner-assessee under section 86 of the rajasthan sales tax act 1994 (for short, the act of 1994) against the impugned judgment/order dated 20th of september 2002, passed by the learned tax board, ajmer, whereby three appeals filed by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 29 2013 (HC)

M/S Indian Gum Industries Ltd Vs. Asst. Ocmmissioner, Ct

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... cancellation of registration must be rejected. to accept it would be to nullify the provisions of the statute which entitle persons dealing with registered dealers to act upon the strength of registration certificates. for authenticating his submissions on this proposition, the learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on a decision ..... and exposing falsehood. as in that case the assessing officer refused to summon the said person for cross-examination, the supreme court held that the act of the assessing officer in refusing to summon the said person for cross-examination by the assessee clearly constituted infraction of the right conferred on the ..... respondents. *** reportable by the court: all these six revision petitions are preferred by the petitioner-assessee under section 86 of the rajasthan sales tax act 1994 (for short, the act of 1994) against the impugned judgment/order dated 20th of september 2002, passed by the learned tax board, ajmer, whereby three appeals filed by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 29 2013 (HC)

M/S Indian Gum Industries Ltd Vs. Asst.Commissioner, Ct

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... cancellation of registration must be rejected. to accept it would be to nullify the provisions of the statute which entitle persons dealing with registered dealers to act upon the strength of registration certificates. for authenticating his submissions on this proposition, the learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on a decision ..... and exposing falsehood. as in that case the assessing officer refused to summon the said person for cross-examination, the supreme court held that the act of the assessing officer in refusing to summon the said person for cross-examination by the assessee clearly constituted infraction of the right conferred on the ..... respondents. *** reportable by the court: all these six revision petitions are preferred by the petitioner-assessee under section 86 of the rajasthan sales tax act 1994 (for short, the act of 1994) against the impugned judgment/order dated 20th of september 2002, passed by the learned tax board, ajmer, whereby three appeals filed by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 30 2013 (HC)

State of Raj. and ors Vs. Bharti and anr

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... the category. in fact, their category got changed for vis major over which, they had no control; rather they would have never wished it to happen. vis major i.e., act of god, refers to an occurrence taking place exclusively due to natural causes, and being of external nature, and further being the one which cannot be anticipated or provided against .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 30 2013 (HC)

State of Raj Vs. Smt. Meena Purohit and anr

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... the category. in fact, their category got changed for vis major over which, they had no control; rather they would have never wished it to happen. vis major i.e., act of god, refers to an occurrence taking place exclusively due to natural causes, and being of external nature, and further being the one which cannot be anticipated or provided against .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 30 2013 (HC)

State of Raj Vs. Parvati Suthar and anr

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... the category. in fact, their category got changed for vis major over which, they had no control; rather they would have never wished it to happen. vis major i.e., act of god, refers to an occurrence taking place exclusively due to natural causes, and being of external nature, and further being the one which cannot be anticipated or provided against .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 30 2013 (HC)

State of Raj. and ors Vs. Ms. Jamna Rajpurohit

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... the category. in fact, their category got changed for vis major over which, they had no control; rather they would have never wished it to happen. vis major i.e., act of god, refers to an occurrence taking place exclusively due to natural causes, and being of external nature, and further being the one which cannot be anticipated or provided against .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 02 2013 (HC)

A.C.T.O.F/S Sriganganagar Vs. M/S Bunge India Pvt.Ltd

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... disgruntled from the order of the appellate authority, the petitioner-revenue approached the learned tax board by way of preferring an appeal under section 85 of the act of 1994. the learned tax board fully concurred with the order passed by the appellate authority and dismissed the appeal of the petitioner-revenue vide its impugned ..... appeal under section 84 of the act of 1994, before the dy. commissioner, appeals, commercial taxes, kota and the said appeal was allowed by the appellate authority vide its order dated 22.2. ..... the details mentioned in the documents. considering all these facts and circumstances, the assessing authority concluded that the assessee has contravened the section 78(2) of the act of 1994, and by the assessment order dated 2.3.1995, imposed penalty against it. appealed from the order of assessing authority, the respondent assessee laid an .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 03 2013 (HC)

United India Insurance Company Limited Vs. Smt. Dhai and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... the age of the deceased, the same cannot be made subject matter of judicial scrutiny in exercise of appellate jurisdiction of this court under section 30 of the act of 1923. in my considered opinion, this too cannot be categorized as a substantial question of law. thus, viewed from any angle, may be that the ..... of challenge to the appellant insurance company because this supposed error cannot be categorized as a substantial question of law within the ambit of section 30 of the act of 1925. the finding of the learned commissioner about monthly salary and daily allowance of the deceased is based on appreciation of evidence which remained unimpeached and ..... the insurance company. the brief facts, giving rise to these appeals, are that respondent no.1 & 2 laid a joint petition under section 22 of the act of 1923 claiming compensation against the third respondent and the appellant insurance company quantifying the amount of compensation to the tune of rupees three lacs with interest and penalty .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //