Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... of pregnancy. if the woman has suffered an unwanted pregnancy, it can be terminated and this is legal and permissible under the medical termination of pregnancy act, 1971.29. the cause of action for claiming compensation in cases of failed sterilization operation arises on account of negligence of the surgeon and not on ..... menstrual cycle, it is expected of the couple to visit the doctor and seek medical advice. a reference to the provisions of the medical termination of pregnancy act, 1971 is apposite. section 3 thereof permits termination of pregnancy by a registered medical practitioner, notwithstanding anything contained in the indian penal code, 1860 in certain ..... to get any relief by the respondents at their own, she preferred an application as per the provisions of section 22(b) of the legal services authority act, 1987. the permanent lok adalat after considering contents of the application and the reply thereto arrived at the conclusion that though there was no evidence about .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... 06.1992 passed by the assessing authority district collector, barmer in the ceiling proceedings culminated under the provisions of rajasthan imposition of ceiling on agricultural holdings act, 1973 (for short 'the act of 1973' hereinafter) and the order dated 24.10.1994 passed by the revenue board in an appeal preferred against the order passed by the ..... district collector, barmer. brief facts of the case are that proceedings under the provisions of chapter iii-b of the rajasthan tenancy act, 1955 (for short 'the act o 1955. hereinafter) were initiated against the petitioner and the assistant collector, barmer had dropped the proceedings vide order dated 17.09.1971, while ..... bench of this court in kesri lal & 3 ors. vs. state of rajasthan & ors., while taking into consideration the provisions of section 30-b of the act of 1955, has held as under:7. apart from this, the learned member, board of revenue without examing the contention of the appellant that that his adult 8 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... meaning thereby, the central government while performing its sovereign duty and to maintain educational standard for the children enacted the right of children to free & compulsory education act, 2009 and state government recruited teachers while amending the service rules on the posts of teacher grade-iii (level-i and level-ii). 19 it is admitted ..... deem it appropriate to observe that in the year 2009 the parliament of the country enacted the right of children to free and compulsory education act, 2009. in the said act, qualification of the post of teacher grade-iii is enumerated and specifically to maintain educational standards certain special qualification known as tet is provided ..... respondent is that appointment in any of the project or scheme is not de hors the rules, therefore, it cannot be said that the state government is acting contrary to the provisions of the constitution. the grant of bonus marks is specifically provided under rule 25 of the rules of 2013, therefore, the action .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... .2000 stayed the execution of the award other than the amount deposited by the appellant corporation under section 140 and proviso to section 173(1) of the motor vehicles act, 1988 ('the act'). it is submitted by learned counsel for the appellants that the tribunal fell in error in coming to the conclusion that the driver of the appellant corporation was driving ..... the date of filing application i.e. 04.07.1996. after adjusting the amount deposited by the appellant corporation under section 140 and proviso to section 173(1) of the act, the rest of the amount be paid to the claimants within a period of two months in terms of the award. no costs. (arun bhansali), j.a.k.chouhan/- 13
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR D.B.Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No.9415/2012 Mal Chand Jain V/s The State of Rajasthan & ors. Date when the order was reserved ::- 24.7.2013 Date of pronouncement of order ::- 26.7.2013 PRESENT Hon'ble the Chief Justice Mr.Amitava Roy Hon'ble Mr.Justice P.K.Lohra Mr.M.C.Bhoot, Senior Advocate with Mr.K.S.Yadav for the petitioner. Mr.G.R.Punia, Additional Advocate General) Dr.Sachin Acharya ) Dr.P.S.Bhati )-for the respondents. Mr.Mukul Singhvi ) ORDER BY THE COURT (Per Hon'ble Mr. Amitava Roy, CJ) Heard Mr.M.C.Bhoot, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, Mr.G.R.Punia, learned Additional Advocate General, Dr.Sachin Acharya, Dr.P.S.Bhati and Mr.Mukul Singhvi for the respondents. The petitioner has averred that he is a resident of Suratgarh and a journalist by profession and that he is also a social worker. 2 He has introduced himself as well as a member of Chaudhary Charan Singh Chowk Over Bridge Nirman Sangharsh Samiti (for s...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... the words belonging to govern general category is grammatically attractive but the suggested construction not only would defeat the main purposes of the provisions and the scheme of the act, which is to make special provisions for those with special needs, and to the understanding of the legislature when it enacted sections 10 and 18 of the 10 ..... d.b. civil special appeal (w) no.170/2013 smt. megha shetty vs. state of raj. & ors. (alongwith other 3 similar matters) 1973 act. the apprehension that persons belonging to general category may lose their chance forever or for a long time to get themselves elected is totally untenable and unsustainable. the whole idea ..... the seats meant for the unreserved category.40. be that at it may, neither article 243-t of the constitution nor section 10(5) of the haryana municipal act provide for any reservation to the office of the president in favour of any candidate who does not belong to schedule caste or backward class. obviously there cannot .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... said benefits. learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this further strengthens the case of the members of the petitioner society that the respondents have acted mechanically without application of mind while issuing notification dated 21st december 2005 and the administrative instructions dated 27th of december 2005. in substance, the submission ..... of india, ministry of finance (department of economic affairs), (insurance division), in exercise of powers under section 17a of the general insurance business (nationalization) act, 1972. the scheme of 2004 is floated as a measure of golden hand shake by offering payment of ex-gratia amount and [3] other benefits ..... cause of retired employees/officers of the respondent insurance companies in these petitions is espoused by the petitioner society, registered under the rajasthan societies registration act 1958, having registration no.298. enumerating the objects of the society, it is pleaded in the writ petitions that the same has come into .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... any transaction or negotiations with the authority, cannot invoke the 45 doctrine of legitimate expectation, merely on the ground that the authority has a general obligation to act fairly.17. this court also explained the remedies flowing by applying the principle of legitimate expectation : (scc pp.546-47, para33) " it is ..... said that the notification dated 03.04.2013 is wrongly made applicable retrospectively. with regard to legislative competence it is submitted that section 15 of the act of 1957 clearly provides power to the state government to prescribe method for deciding applications for allotment of mineral mines. the applicants have filed applications ..... notification dated 03.04.2013 is beyond the legislative competence of the state government because under section 15 of the mines & minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 no such power is left with the state government to provide such provision for rejection of application. learned counsel mr. rajesh joshi invited attention .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... any transaction or negotiations with the authority, cannot invoke the 45 doctrine of legitimate expectation, merely on the ground that the authority has a general obligation to act fairly.17. this court also explained the remedies flowing by applying the principle of legitimate expectation : (scc pp.546-47, para33) " it is ..... said that the notification dated 03.04.2013 is wrongly made applicable retrospectively. with regard to legislative competence it is submitted that section 15 of the act of 1957 clearly provides power to the state government to prescribe method for deciding applications for allotment of mineral mines. the applicants have filed applications ..... notification dated 03.04.2013 is beyond the legislative competence of the state government because under section 15 of the mines & minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 no such power is left with the state government to provide such provision for rejection of application. learned counsel mr. rajesh joshi invited attention .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... any transaction or negotiations with the authority, cannot invoke the 45 doctrine of legitimate expectation, merely on the ground that the authority has a general obligation to act fairly.17. this court also explained the remedies flowing by applying the principle of legitimate expectation : (scc pp.546-47, para33) " it is ..... said that the notification dated 03.04.2013 is wrongly made applicable retrospectively. with regard to legislative competence it is submitted that section 15 of the act of 1957 clearly provides power to the state government to prescribe method for deciding applications for allotment of mineral mines. the applicants have filed applications ..... notification dated 03.04.2013 is beyond the legislative competence of the state government because under section 15 of the mines & minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 no such power is left with the state government to provide such provision for rejection of application. learned counsel mr. rajesh joshi invited attention .....
Tag this Judgment!