Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: dehra dun act 1871 Sorted by: old Page 2 of about 280,202 results (0.407 seconds)

Nix Vs. Allen

Court : US Supreme Court

..... and cultivated the remaining three-quarters of the quarter section without title, did not reside upon the three-quarters so cultivated, within the meaning of c. 289, acts of arkansas, 1871, which gave persons then residing upon lands belonging to or claimed by the cairo and fulton railroad company, or its branches, the right to purchase them not to ..... that condition of things. it follows that the appellant is not entitled to the privileges of the act of 1871, and his claim, both under the acts of congress and those of state, has failed. this makes it unnecessary to consider whether the act of 1871 is constitutional. good or bad, it is of no use to him. the same is ..... the appellant or his mother for the same reason. the privileges of that act could only be secured "by complying with the conditions prescribed" in the act of 1856. this reduces the claims of the appellant to such as he has under the act of 1871. that act grants the privilege of a preference purchaser only to a "settler who, on .....

Poindexter Vs. Greenhow

Court : US Supreme Court

..... said petition." the contract which the plaintiff in error alleges has been violated is with the state of virginia, and is contained in the act of march 30, 1871, known as the "funding act," entitled "an act to provide for the funding and payment of the public debt," and in the bonds and coupons issued under its authority. it provided ..... the public sense of duty to the public creditors. the only security for their performance was the public faith. but immediately on the passage of the act of march 30, 1871, and thereafter, occasional or continued default in the payment of interest on the bonds issued in pursuance of its provisions by reason of failures to provide ..... holder deserve to be further explained. it was evidently a part of the consideration on which the creditors of the state were induced to accept, under the act of march 30, 1871, from the state of virginia, new obligations for two-thirds of their claim, in exchange for the surrender of the original bonds. the latter depended for .....

Peake Vs. New Orleans

Court : US Supreme Court

..... for any purposes except those expressly limited in the statute -- those issued in payment for excavations and levees authorized to be made by the act of 1871, and the preceding acts. and why? for a reason entirely in harmony with the whole tendency of the entire series of statutes and with the requirements of good ..... by the original board . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 500,714.43 2. ditto in the second district . . . . . 289,907.40 3. levy made by the city, under the act of 1871, in the third district . . 627,589.95 4. ditto in the fourth district . . . . . 281,416.81 ------------ total amount chargeable . . . . . . $1,699,628.58 this sum includes the assessments ..... assessment proceedings had proceeded page 139 u. s. 358 so far that there was a large apparent obligation of the city to the drainage fund. in 1871, an act of the legislature is passed, empowering the canal company to complete the work, transferring to a subordinate administrative body of the city all assessments theretofore made, .....

Thandavan Chetti and anr. Vs. Valliammai and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1892)IIMLJ130

..... of the kind then in question embodied one single transaction or might properly be said to contain more. the same view has been taken by this court after the registration act of 1871 came into force, stri seshathri ayyengar v. sankara ayen 7 m. h. c. r 296; jagappa v. latchappa i. l. r 5 m 119. achoo ..... , as evidence in support of the claim for the movables, which alone are sought to be recovered in this suit.12. section 49 of the present registration act renders an unregistered document inadmissible as evidence of any transaction affecting immovable property, which is the kind of property expressly mentioned in the preceding clause and referred to as ..... the document or use it in evidence in respect of any part of the transaction in question. i think this contention is unsustainable. section 49 of the registration act lays down that no document required to be registered by section 17 shall, unless duly registered, 'affect any immovable property comprised therein,' or 'be received as evidence .....

Thandavan and anr. Vs. Valliamma and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1892)ILR15Mad336

..... kind then in question embodied one single transaction or might properly be said to contain more. the same view has been taken by this court after the registration act of 1871 came into force--see stri seshathri ayyengar v. sankara ayen 7 m.h.c.r. 296 jagapypa v. latchappa i.l.r. 5 mad. 119. achoo ..... registration as evidence in support of the claim for the moveables, which alone are sought to be recovered in this suit.12. section 49 of the present registration act renders an unregistered document inadmissible as evidence of any transaction affecting immoveable property, which is the kind of property expressly mentioned in the preceding clause and referred to ..... the document or use it in evidence in respect of any part of the transaction in question. i think this contention is unsustainable. section 49 of the registration act lays down that no document required to be registered by section 17 shall, unless duly registered, 'affect any immoveable property comprised therein,' or 'be received as .....

Kottal Uppi Haji Vs. Vayoth Randupurayil Mammavan

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1893)3MLJ191

..... the mention of the name of the mortgagor but lays down that the acknowledgment is sufficient though it omits to specify the exact nature of the right. under the act of 1871 an acknowledgment of the mortgagor's title or right of redemption was required and if it had been the intention of the legislature that the name of the mortgagor ..... that the mortgage of 1805 was true but relied on the act of limitations. he failed to show that there was any other mortgage to which the acknowledgment of the testator could have referred. under these circumstances the decision of the ..... kanom.' the question is whether this is such an acknowledgment of liability in respect of the property as to bring it within the requirements of section 19 of the limitation act. there can be no doubt that it was an acknowledgment by the testator, that he then held the estate on kanom title. the defendant in this suit admitted .....

Uppi Haji Vs. Mammavan

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1893)ILR16Mad366

..... mention of the name of the mortgagor, but lays down that the acknowledgment is sufficient, though it omits to specify the exact nature of the right. under the act of 1871 an acknowledgment of the mortgagor's title or right of redemption was required, and if it had been the intention of the legislature that the name of the mortgagor ..... the mortgage of 1805 was true, but relied on the act of limitations. he failed to show that there was any other mortgage to which the acknowledgment of the testator could have referred. under these circumstances the decision of the ..... .' the question is whether this is such an acknowledgment of liability in respect of the property as to bring it within the requirements of section 19 of the limitation act. there can be no doubt that it was an acknowledgment by the testator that he then held the estate on kanom title. the defendant in this suit admitted that .....

Barnum Vs. Okolona

Court : US Supreme Court

..... the amount whereof he was entitled to recover. the declaration likewise averred that said bonds recited that they had been issued in pursuance of the said act of march 25, 1871. to this declaration the defendant demurred, and assigned for cause, among other things, that it appeared in and by said declaration that the bonds sued ..... , the court declined to hear further argument. mr. justice shiras, after stating the facts in the foregoing language, delivered the opinion of the court. the act of march 25, 1871, of the state of mississippi, authorized certain counties, cities, and towns to aid in the construction of the grenada, houston, and eastern railroad by subscribing ..... the united states for the northern district of mississippi syllabus town bonds having more than ten years to run, issued by a town in mississippi under the act of march 26, 1871, of the legislature of mississippi, to aid in the construction of the grenada, houston and eastern railroad are void. woodruff v. okolona, 57 miss. .....

Texas and Pacific Ry. Co. Vs. Smith

Court : US Supreme Court

..... to hotchkiss & tomkies. on december 1, 1874, a united states patent was issued to wylie for the land. prior to his homestead entry and on april 27, 1871, an act was passed by the state of louisiana incorporating the city of shreveport, and the tract in controversy was within the boundaries of that city as defined in the ..... wylie first entered upon the land for the purpose of making it his homestead, or when he first initiated his rights in respect thereto. the city was incorporated in 1871, the receiver's receipt was issued in october, 1872. wylie might have been in occupation of the land years before the incorporation of the city, might have made ..... application to enter it as a homestead before such incorporation, and a right thus initiated would not be defeated by the subsequent act of the state in incorporating the city. it follows, therefore, that as the receipt, which was upon its face sufficient to transfer the full equitable title to wylie, .....

Raghu Singh and anr. Vs. Abdul Wahab

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1896)ILR23Cal442

..... competent jurisdiction.' in this case it was not an irregularity, but an illegality which the magistrate committed, and the magistrate who passed the order under section 22 of act i of 1871 was not a court of competent jurisdiction. we are therefore constrained to make this rule absolute, which we accordingly do, setting aside the order of the magistrate, ..... . 44-4 as compensation to a certain person, named abdul wahab, for the illegal seizure of his cattle. this order has been passed under section 22 of act i of 1871. the petitioners have obtained a rule to show cause why this order should not be set aside, on the ground that the deputy magistrate was vested with only ..... second-class powers, and was consequently not competent to make the order passed by him.2. section 20 of act i of 1871, as amended by act i of 1891, authorizes a person, whose cattle have been seized under the act, to make a complaint within ten days to the magistrate of the district, or to any magistrate authorized to .....