Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: dehra dun act 1871 Court: rajasthan jodhpur Page 2 of about 483 results (0.141 seconds)

Aug 11 2015 (HC)

Prem Devi and Another Vs. Bholanath Gattani

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... the submission on behalf of the respondents as well that merely because the will was more than 30 years old, a presumption under section 90 of the evidence act, 1872 ("the evidence act", for short) ought to be drawn that the document has been duly executed and attested by the persons by whom it purports to have been executed and ..... will was more than 30 years old and have been produced from the proper custody, therefore, a presumption should have been taken under section 90 of the evidence act by the courts below for its due execution and attestation. he submitted that both the courts below have failed to take into consideration the fact that scribe and all ..... was more than 30 years old and produced from proper custody then the valid presumption of its due execution and attestation can be raised under section 90 of the evidence act?" 6. i have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material on record minutely and carefully. 7. it is submitted by the learned senior counsel for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 09 2015 (HC)

Darshana Gupta Vs. None and Another

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... these submissions, learned counsel has vociferously urged that the learned court below has not made any endeavour to harmoniously construe the provisions contained under the act of 2000 with the act of 1956, and as such the impugned order cannot be sustained. lastly, dr. acharya has urged that in the impugned order the learned ..... court below thrashed out the matter and rejected the application by the impugned order. 4. learned counsel for the appellant dr. sachin acharya submits that the act of 2000 is enacted with laudable objects for the rehabilitation and providing social integration to orphaned, abandoned or surrendered children and therefore it is intended to regulate ..... opponent much less formidable opponent. appellant, ms. darshana gupta, has laid this appeal under section 52 of the juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act, 2000 (for short, act of 2000) read with order 43 rule 1 of the code of civil procedure, 1908 (for short, cpc) to assail the impugned order dated 18th .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 06 2015 (HC)

ITI Limited through its Chairman and Managing Director, Bangalore Vs. ...

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... respondents, on the other hand, has submitted that the termination was bad in law, as it amounted to retrenchment without taking recourse to the provisions of the act. the permission of the central government was not taken before terminating services of the respondents and that they were not even given notice and, thus, the ..... 12 calendar months preceding termination, the employer is under obligation to make compliance of section 25f so also rule 77 of the industrial disputes rules made under the act. relying upon para 16 of the judgment in harjinder singh's case (supra), the learned single judge did not interfere with the judgment of the industrial tribunal ..... in the affidavit of shri r.b.singh, the project manager, iti limited, bikaner, it was stated that iti limited is a company, registered under the companies act, 1956 in which the central government holds 100% share. the ministry of defence had entrusted the project for army static communication network to the company. the project .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 23 2014 (HC)

Lalit Kumar Deora Vs. State of Raj. and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11681/2013 Lalit Kumar Deora Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Order dt:23. 04/2014 1/12 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11681/2013 Lalit Kumar Deora Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. DATE OF ORDER :::23. d April 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Appearance: Mr. Ganapat Lal Prajapat, for the petitioner. Mr. B.L. Bhati, Govt. Counsel. -- 1. The petitioner was working as Upper Division Clerk at the relevant time at Government Girls Higher Secondary School, Ratanda, Jodhpur, and has filed the present writ petition in this Court on 09.09.2013 claiming reimbursement of the medical expenses to the tune of Rs.1,15,000/- paid by him to Sterling Hospitals, Ahmedabad, for treatment of his Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery (CABG) in an emergency on 29.06.2010.2. The petitioner while working as UDC in the aforesaid school, in the month of June, 2010, visited Ahmedabad to discharge his social obligati...

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 31 2015 (HC)

State and Anr Vs. Dr. Kantesh Khetani and Ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... by the indian judiciary system. in brojo nath ganguly's case(supra), the supreme court held, considering the question in the light of section 23 of the contract act, which provides that a contract which is opposed to public policy, would be void, that the public policy is not capable of a precise definition; it however ..... hospitals of jodhpur, affiliated by dr. s.n. medical college, jodhpur. the medical qualification awarded by the nbe, was included in the first schedule, appended to the act of 1956, and was at par with the pg medical qualifications of the indian universities. the notification dated 03.10.1994, in the bulletin of information and application form ..... was submitted that the contract for working on honorary basis, was accepted under the influence of the respondents, and was hit by section 16(1) of the indian contract act, 1872, and for which, they relied on central inland water transport corporation vs. brojo nath ganguly and anr., (1986) 3 scc156 10. after making a request to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 17 2015 (HC)

Dr. Sonal Parashar Vs. State and Anr

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... have serious impact on society. similarly, any compromise between the victim and offender in relation to the offences under special statutes like prevention of corruption act or the offences committed by public servants while working in that capacity etc.cannot provide for any basis for quashing criminal proceedings involving such offences. but ..... dr. sonal parashar and the respondent no.2 have decided to live separately by mutual consent and filed application under section 13-b of hindu marriage act, 1955 and the same is pending adjudication before the concerned family court. today also learned counsel for the respondent no.2 has categorically submitted that ..... one another connected case 3 the respondent no.2 have decided to live separately by mutual consent and filed application under section 13-b of hindu marriage act, 1955 and the same is pending adjudication before the concerned family court. learned counsel for the petitioners has argued that since the matrimonial dispute has already .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 17 2012 (HC)

Dr. S.N. Ojha and ors Vs. Stat E and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... finance department. in this connection, it is worthwhile to observe that earlier vide communication dated 07.07.2011 the finance department advised the university to act as per guidelines contained in the revised ugc regulations 2010, in which, there is no separate eligibility prescribed or eligibility is granted only to direct ..... agriculture universities of rajasthan was forwarded to the finance department for its clarification and in return the finance department of the government of rajasthan has advised to act as per guidelines contained in the u.g.c. regulations 2010. the communication dated 07.07.2011 is as follows :17. sub: revision of ..... -iv, government of rajasthan, jaipur and 8 forwarded by the agriculture department to the respondent university. the finance department of government of rajasthan advised to act as per the guidelines contained in the ugc regulations 2010, therefore, as per government decision to follow cas, respondent university initiated the process under the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 17 2012 (HC)

Dr Ajay Kumar Sharma and ors Vs. Stat E and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... finance department. in this connection, it is worthwhile to observe that earlier vide communication dated 07.07.2011 the finance department advised the university to act as per guidelines contained in the revised ugc regulations 2010, in which, there is no separate eligibility prescribed or eligibility is granted only to direct ..... agriculture universities of rajasthan was forwarded to the finance department for its clarification and in return the finance department of the government of rajasthan has advised to act as per guidelines contained in the u.g.c. regulations 2010. the communication dated 07.07.2011 is as follows :17. sub: revision of ..... -iv, government of rajasthan, jaipur and 8 forwarded by the agriculture department to the respondent university. the finance department of government of rajasthan advised to act as per the guidelines contained in the ugc regulations 2010, therefore, as per government decision to follow cas, respondent university initiated the process under the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 17 2012 (HC)

Dr. Sophia Gir and ors Vs. State (Higher Education) and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... finance department. in this connection, it is worthwhile to observe that earlier vide communication dated 07.07.2011 the finance department advised the university to act as per guidelines contained in the revised ugc regulations 2010, in which, there is no separate eligibility prescribed or eligibility is granted only to direct ..... agriculture universities of rajasthan was forwarded to the finance department for its clarification and in return the finance department of the government of rajasthan has advised to act as per guidelines contained in the u.g.c. regulations 2010. the communication dated 07.07.2011 is as follows :17. sub: revision of ..... -iv, government of rajasthan, jaipur and 8 forwarded by the agriculture department to the respondent university. the finance department of government of rajasthan advised to act as per the guidelines contained in the ugc regulations 2010, therefore, as per government decision to follow cas, respondent university initiated the process under the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 17 2012 (HC)

Dr. G.K. Mathur Vs. State (Higher Education) and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... finance department. in this connection, it is worthwhile to observe that earlier vide communication dated 07.07.2011 the finance department advised the university to act as per guidelines contained in the revised ugc regulations 2010, in which, there is no separate eligibility prescribed or eligibility is granted only to direct ..... agriculture universities of rajasthan was forwarded to the finance department for its clarification and in return the finance department of the government of rajasthan has advised to act as per guidelines contained in the u.g.c. regulations 2010. the communication dated 07.07.2011 is as follows :17. sub: revision of ..... -iv, government of rajasthan, jaipur and 8 forwarded by the agriculture department to the respondent university. the finance department of government of rajasthan advised to act as per the guidelines contained in the ugc regulations 2010, therefore, as per government decision to follow cas, respondent university initiated the process under the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //