Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... requirements would result in excluding such evidence from consideration. therefore, these call details would not be admissible in evidence under section 65-b of the evidence act. however, this does not dent the prosecution case in the wake of statements of prosecution witnesses who have established the case. it could only be construed ..... there is also no certificate of any authorized officer about genuineness of those call details in terms of conditions provided in section 65-b of the evidence act. it was incumbent upon the prosecution to have produced the certificate from the authorized officer to establish the genuineness and authenticity of those call details. these ..... a specific provision to deal with this menace. it [was]. necessary to amend the indian penal code to provide for deterrent punishment to persons committing such acts and to make consequential amendments to the code of criminal procedure, 1973. . it is clear from the above the concern of parliament in dealing with cases .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... requirements would result in excluding such evidence from consideration. therefore, these call details would not be admissible in evidence under section 65-b of the evidence act. however, this does not dent the prosecution case in the wake of statements of prosecution witnesses who have established the case. it could only be construed ..... there is also no certificate of any authorized officer about genuineness of those call details in terms of conditions provided in section 65-b of the evidence act. it was incumbent upon the prosecution to have produced the certificate from the authorized officer to establish the genuineness and authenticity of those call details. these ..... a specific provision to deal with this menace. it [was]. necessary to amend the indian penal code to provide for deterrent punishment to persons committing such acts and to make consequential amendments to the code of criminal procedure, 1973. . it is clear from the above the concern of parliament in dealing with cases .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... not private in nature and have serious impact on society. similarly, any compromise between the victim and offender in relation to the offences under special statutes like prevention of corruption act or the offences committed by public servants while working in that capacity etc.cannot provide for any basis for quashing criminal proceedings involving such offences. but the criminal cases having .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... .v/s state of rajasthan & anr. 5 impact on society. similarly, any compromise between the victim and offender in relation to the offences under special statutes like prevention of corruption act or the offences committed by public servants while working in that capacity etc.cannot provide for any basis for quashing criminal proceedings involving such offences. but the criminal cases having .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... in laxmibai (supra), hon'ble apex court while considering a registered adoption deed declined to dislodge the presumption about its validity under section 16 of the act of 1956 on mere technicalities that adoption deed is signed by natural parents as witnesses and not as executing parties. while discussing the manner of appreciation of ..... deed dated 16.06.1992 on appreciation of evidence and ameliorating the other relevant circumstances satisfies the requirement of a valid adoption within the four corners of the act of 1956?. . for thrashing out this issue in legal perspective, averments of the plaint in this behalf are of utmost significance denoting the very foundation ..... of the adoption of the respondent. with these submissions, learned counsel submits that arguments of the appellant on the anvil of sections 6 & 7 of the act of 1956 are not tenable. mr.parihar has also argued that if averments contained in the plaint are harmoniously construed, then it clearly emerges out that appellant .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. ORDER (1)SBCivil Writ Petition No.6207/2009 (Rajkumar & Ors.v.State of Raj. & Ors.) (2)SBCivil Writ Petition No.6632/2009 (Fateh Singh Bhati & Ors.v.State of Raj. & Ors.) (3)SBCivil Writ Petition No.6770/2009 (Mahesh Kumar Patidar & Ors.v.State of Raj. & Ors.) (4)SBCivil Writ Petition No.6943/2009 (Moinuddin Mansuri & Ors.v.State of Raj.& Ors.) (5)SBCivil Writ Petition No.6978/2009 (Devilal Dhaker & Ors.v.State of Raj. & Ors.) (6)SBCivil Writ Petition No.9163/2010 (Sumitra Vaishnav v. State of Raj. & Ors.) (7)SBCivil Writ Petition No.7995/2011 (Sumitra Vaishnav v. State of Raj. & Ors.) (8)DBCivil Special Appeal (Writ) No.113/2013 (Kiran Choudhary v. State of Raj. & Ors.) (9)DBCivil Special Appeal (Writ) No.114/2013 (Sanjay Kumar Dhing & Ors.v.State of Raj. & Ors.) (10)DBCivil Special Appeal (Writ) No.115/2013 (Mustak Ali & Ors.v.State of Raj. & Ors.) Date of Order :: 30th November, 2015 HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR HON'BLE...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. ORDER (1)SBCivil Writ Petition No.6207/2009 (Rajkumar & Ors.v.State of Raj. & Ors.) (2)SBCivil Writ Petition No.6632/2009 (Fateh Singh Bhati & Ors.v.State of Raj. & Ors.) (3)SBCivil Writ Petition No.6770/2009 (Mahesh Kumar Patidar & Ors.v.State of Raj. & Ors.) (4)SBCivil Writ Petition No.6943/2009 (Moinuddin Mansuri & Ors.v.State of Raj.& Ors.) (5)SBCivil Writ Petition No.6978/2009 (Devilal Dhaker & Ors.v.State of Raj. & Ors.) (6)SBCivil Writ Petition No.9163/2010 (Sumitra Vaishnav v. State of Raj. & Ors.) (7)SBCivil Writ Petition No.7995/2011 (Sumitra Vaishnav v. State of Raj. & Ors.) (8)DBCivil Special Appeal (Writ) No.113/2013 (Kiran Choudhary v. State of Raj. & Ors.) (9)DBCivil Special Appeal (Writ) No.114/2013 (Sanjay Kumar Dhing & Ors.v.State of Raj. & Ors.) (10)DBCivil Special Appeal (Writ) No.115/2013 (Mustak Ali & Ors.v.State of Raj. & Ors.) Date of Order :: 30th November, 2015 HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR HON'BLE...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. ORDER (1)SBCivil Writ Petition No.6207/2009 (Rajkumar & Ors.v.State of Raj. & Ors.) (2)SBCivil Writ Petition No.6632/2009 (Fateh Singh Bhati & Ors.v.State of Raj. & Ors.) (3)SBCivil Writ Petition No.6770/2009 (Mahesh Kumar Patidar & Ors.v.State of Raj. & Ors.) (4)SBCivil Writ Petition No.6943/2009 (Moinuddin Mansuri & Ors.v.State of Raj.& Ors.) (5)SBCivil Writ Petition No.6978/2009 (Devilal Dhaker & Ors.v.State of Raj. & Ors.) (6)SBCivil Writ Petition No.9163/2010 (Sumitra Vaishnav v. State of Raj. & Ors.) (7)SBCivil Writ Petition No.7995/2011 (Sumitra Vaishnav v. State of Raj. & Ors.) (8)DBCivil Special Appeal (Writ) No.113/2013 (Kiran Choudhary v. State of Raj. & Ors.) (9)DBCivil Special Appeal (Writ) No.114/2013 (Sanjay Kumar Dhing & Ors.v.State of Raj. & Ors.) (10)DBCivil Special Appeal (Writ) No.115/2013 (Mustak Ali & Ors.v.State of Raj. & Ors.) Date of Order :: 30th November, 2015 HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR HON'BLE...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. ORDER (1)SBCivil Writ Petition No.6207/2009 (Rajkumar & Ors.v.State of Raj. & Ors.) (2)SBCivil Writ Petition No.6632/2009 (Fateh Singh Bhati & Ors.v.State of Raj. & Ors.) (3)SBCivil Writ Petition No.6770/2009 (Mahesh Kumar Patidar & Ors.v.State of Raj. & Ors.) (4)SBCivil Writ Petition No.6943/2009 (Moinuddin Mansuri & Ors.v.State of Raj.& Ors.) (5)SBCivil Writ Petition No.6978/2009 (Devilal Dhaker & Ors.v.State of Raj. & Ors.) (6)SBCivil Writ Petition No.9163/2010 (Sumitra Vaishnav v. State of Raj. & Ors.) (7)SBCivil Writ Petition No.7995/2011 (Sumitra Vaishnav v. State of Raj. & Ors.) (8)DBCivil Special Appeal (Writ) No.113/2013 (Kiran Choudhary v. State of Raj. & Ors.) (9)DBCivil Special Appeal (Writ) No.114/2013 (Sanjay Kumar Dhing & Ors.v.State of Raj. & Ors.) (10)DBCivil Special Appeal (Writ) No.115/2013 (Mustak Ali & Ors.v.State of Raj. & Ors.) Date of Order :: 30th November, 2015 HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR HON'BLE...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. ORDER (1)SBCivil Writ Petition No.6207/2009 (Rajkumar & Ors.v.State of Raj. & Ors.) (2)SBCivil Writ Petition No.6632/2009 (Fateh Singh Bhati & Ors.v.State of Raj. & Ors.) (3)SBCivil Writ Petition No.6770/2009 (Mahesh Kumar Patidar & Ors.v.State of Raj. & Ors.) (4)SBCivil Writ Petition No.6943/2009 (Moinuddin Mansuri & Ors.v.State of Raj.& Ors.) (5)SBCivil Writ Petition No.6978/2009 (Devilal Dhaker & Ors.v.State of Raj. & Ors.) (6)SBCivil Writ Petition No.9163/2010 (Sumitra Vaishnav v. State of Raj. & Ors.) (7)SBCivil Writ Petition No.7995/2011 (Sumitra Vaishnav v. State of Raj. & Ors.) (8)DBCivil Special Appeal (Writ) No.113/2013 (Kiran Choudhary v. State of Raj. & Ors.) (9)DBCivil Special Appeal (Writ) No.114/2013 (Sanjay Kumar Dhing & Ors.v.State of Raj. & Ors.) (10)DBCivil Special Appeal (Writ) No.115/2013 (Mustak Ali & Ors.v.State of Raj. & Ors.) Date of Order :: 30th November, 2015 HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR HON'BLE...
Tag this Judgment!