Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.2591/2014 Smt. Bhanwar Kanwar versus State of Rajasthan & ORS.Order dt: 18/07/2014 1/6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.2591/2014 Smt. Bhanwar Kanwar versus State of Rajasthan & ORS.Date of Order ::: 18th July, 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Appearance: Mr.Mahaveer Singh, for the petitioner. Ms.Sheweta Bora on behalf of Mr.Anil Bissa, Addl. Govt. Counsel. BY THE COURT: 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the controveRs.involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by a judgment of this Court in the case of Smt. Pappu Devi versus State of Rajasthan & ORS.reported in 2009 (2) WLC (Raj.) 158 and in the case of Smt. Paras Kanwar versus State of Rajasthan & ORS.(SBCWP No.11423/2009 decided on 03.11.2009) decided by a coordinate bench of this court, a copy whereof has been placed on record as Annex.3. The matter is regarding payment of special pension payable to the...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... , in the i.t.i., jodhpur, is highly disproportionate. from a bare reading of the impugned order (annex.p/7) dated 28.04.1998, it seems to be simply an act of same insubordination and not accepting the envelop containing the transfer order of the delinquent official. however, later on, the said transfer order was complied with by the delinquent official .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... , 2013 - ( " , 2010 - ( , 5 - ( "9 :( 167 5 ; 5 ( " ( " " ?.( 5 ( 9 " "9 : ( ;9 ( " sd/- ( 9. . c ) " 6. it is further stated in the reply of the respondent state that the respondents have acted bonafidely looking to the scarcity of technical staff in the ongoing projects & various other important projects in various state public undertakings and departments like dmrc for jaipur metro project, avl .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... , 2013 - ( " , 2010 - ( , 5 - ( "9 :( 167 5 ; 5 ( " ( " " ?.( 5 ( 9 " "9 : ( ;9 ( " sd/- ( 9. . c ) " 6. it is further stated in the reply of the respondent state that the respondents have acted bonafidely looking to the scarcity of technical staff in the ongoing projects & various other important projects in various state public undertakings and departments like dmrc for jaipur metro project, avl .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... , 2013 - ( " , 2010 - ( , 5 - ( "9 :( 167 5 ; 5 ( " ( " " ?.( 5 ( 9 " "9 : ( ;9 ( " sd/- ( 9. . c ) " 6. it is further stated in the reply of the respondent state that the respondents have acted bonafidely looking to the scarcity of technical staff in the ongoing projects & various other important projects in various state public undertakings and departments like dmrc for jaipur metro project, avl .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... , 2013 - ( " , 2010 - ( , 5 - ( "9 :( 167 5 ; 5 ( " ( " " ?.( 5 ( 9 " "9 : ( ;9 ( " sd/- ( 9. . c ) " 6. it is further stated in the reply of the respondent state that the respondents have acted bonafidely looking to the scarcity of technical staff in the ongoing projects & various other important projects in various state public undertakings and departments like dmrc for jaipur metro project, avl .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... , 2013 - ( " , 2010 - ( , 5 - ( "9 :( 167 5 ; 5 ( " ( " " ?.( 5 ( 9 " "9 : ( ;9 ( " sd/- ( 9. . c ) " 6. it is further stated in the reply of the respondent state that the respondents have acted bonafidely looking to the scarcity of technical staff in the ongoing projects & various other important projects in various state public undertakings and departments like dmrc for jaipur metro project, avl .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
SBCWP No.1211/2014 Bhanwar Lal vs. State & ors. a/w 6 connected matters Judgment dt:26/11/2014 1/83 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR JUDGMENT (i) Bhanwar Lal vs. State of Rajasthan & ors. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.1211/2014 (ii) Rajendra Prasad Gora vs. R.P.S.C. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.6249/2014. (iii) Tara Chand & Ors. vs. R.P.S.C. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.6250/2014 (iv) Ravindra Mohan Sharma vs. R.P.S.C. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.6252/2014. (v) Balwant Singh vs. R.P.S.C. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.6253/2014. (vi) Joga Ram & Ors. vs. R.P.S.C. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.6254/2014. (vii) Lokendra Kumar Charoria vs. State & Anr. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.6255/2014. DATE OF JUDGMENT :26. h November, 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI REPORTABLE Mr.Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Gaurav Sharma, ]. Mr.A.K.Choudhary, ]. for the petitioners. Mr.Mahaveer Pareek ]. Mr. N.L.Verma ]. Mr. J.P.Joshi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Siddharth Joshi...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
SBCWP No.1211/2014 Bhanwar Lal vs. State & ors. a/w 6 connected matters Judgment dt:26/11/2014 1/83 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR JUDGMENT (i) Bhanwar Lal vs. State of Rajasthan & ors. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.1211/2014 (ii) Rajendra Prasad Gora vs. R.P.S.C. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.6249/2014. (iii) Tara Chand & Ors. vs. R.P.S.C. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.6250/2014 (iv) Ravindra Mohan Sharma vs. R.P.S.C. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.6252/2014. (v) Balwant Singh vs. R.P.S.C. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.6253/2014. (vi) Joga Ram & Ors. vs. R.P.S.C. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.6254/2014. (vii) Lokendra Kumar Charoria vs. State & Anr. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.6255/2014. DATE OF JUDGMENT :26. h November, 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI REPORTABLE Mr.Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Gaurav Sharma, ]. Mr.A.K.Choudhary, ]. for the petitioners. Mr.Mahaveer Pareek ]. Mr. N.L.Verma ]. Mr. J.P.Joshi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Siddharth Joshi...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... intelligible differentia which distinguishes those that are grouped together from others and (2) that that differentia must have a rational relation to the object sought to be achieved by the act." taking note of the fundamental principles laid down by the apex court and after examining the matter in detail, we do not find any force in the submissions made by .....
Tag this Judgment!