Defended - Judgment Search Results
“defendants in their Written Statement Admitted the Fact of Vs. Gram ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Sep-24-2013
Accordingly, the judgment and decree passed, which is subject matter of challenge in the regular second appeal, was defended.9. Counsel for the Gram Panchayat, on the other hand, placed reliance upon the judgment of the Apex Court
Defendants/Petitioners Are in Revision Under Article 227 of the Vs. Di ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-22-2014
......PetitioneRs.Versus Dilbar Singh......Respondent. CORAM:- HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH Present:- Mr.Jasbir Singh, Advocate for the PetitioneRs.*** JASWANT SINGH, J.(ORAL) Defendants/Petitioners are in revision under Article 227 of the Constitution assailing the order dated 12.03.2014 (P-4) passed by the
Lujan Vs. Defenders of Wildlife
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-12-1992
Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife - 504 U.S. 555 (1992) OCTOBER TERM, 1991 Syllabus LUJAN, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR v. DEFENDERS
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Kaur Chand Vs. Defendants Raj and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-30-1960
Reported in: AIR1960P& H529
(1) This present suit was filed by Defendants Raj and Anant Ram against Kaur Chand and others for possession of land. The ground on which possession
National Assn. of Home Builders Vs. Defenders of Wildlife
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-25-2007
National Assn. of Home Builders v. Defenders of Wildlife - 06-340 (2007) SYLLABUS OCTOBER TERM, 2006 NATIONAL ASSN. OF HOME BUILDERS V. DEFENDERSOF WILDLIFE SUPREME
Jagdish Sahu Vs. 1 State of Chhattisgarh Through Defendants the Collec ...
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Oct-30-2012
CHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR First Appeal No 93 of 2012 Jagdish Sahu ...Petitioners Versus 1 State of Chhattisgarh through Defendants the Collector District Durg CG 2 Kasturchand Loda 3 Fatte Lal Loda 4 M s Sunil Trading Comp
Suresh Kr. Benani and ors.Plaintiffs Vs. Ramgopal Benani and ors.Defen ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-06-2012
The Hon'ble JUSTICE I.P.MUKERJ.Date :6. h December, 2012. For Plaintiffs : Mr.S.N.Mitra, Sr.Adv.with Mr.D.Basak & Mr.J.Ghorai, Adversus For Defendants : Mr.Abhrajit Mitra, Mr.Jishnu Chowdhury, Mr.Souma Bhattacharyya, Adversus I direct the Special Officer, who is not appointed as
Vs. Md. Iqbal Khan and ors.Defendants/
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-27-2014
CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE M/S.ASHUTOSH ROY PRAFULLA KUMAR ROY & ORS.Versus Md.IQBAL KHAN & ORS.Plaintiffs/Petitioners Defendants/Respondents BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE I.P.MUKERJ.Date : 27th January, 2014. For Plaintiffs/Petitioners : Mr.Malay Kr. Ghosh with Mr.Soumen Datta
Beltas Marchants Pvt. Ltd.Petitioner Vs. Indian Fibres Ltd. and ors.De ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Feb-06-2014
2010 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction [Contempt].ORIGINAL SIDE BELTAS MARCHANTS PVT.LTD.Versus INDIAN FIBRES LTD.& ORS.Petitioner Defendants/Respondents BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE I.P.MUKERJ.Date : 6th February, 2014. For Petitioner : Mr.S.K.Kapoor, Sr.Adv.with Mr.A.Kanodia, Adv.Mr.S.K.Kapoor, learned Senior
“In This Case the Defendants Have Filed the Written Statement on 27. ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-04-2014
consequential relief of permanent injunction, restraining respondents-defendants Navjot Kaur widow of Jasbir Singh and others (for short “the defendants”.) from alienating the disputed land in any manner. The defendants contested the claim of plaintiffs, filed the written
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free