Skip to content


Defendant - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: defendant Year: 1935 Page 1 of about 437 results (0.891 seconds)
Oct 22 1935 (PC)

(Saiyed) Alam Ali Vs. Beni Charan and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-22-1935

Reported in : AIR1936All33; 160Ind.Cas.541

..... and the respondent babu bansidhar defendant 1 as between themselves have become the owners in equal shares of the village patara ..... referring order and are as follows the plaintiff respondent brought a suit on the basis of a mortgage deed dated 2nd september 1919 against his mortgagor and the defendant appellant who is a subsequent mortgagee the defendant appellant holds a mortgage of 22nd april .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 29 1935 (PC)

Dakshina Ranjan Choudhury Vs. Surendra Lal Das Gupta

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-29-1935

Reported in : AIR1936Cal310,163Ind.Cas.56

..... would cover only the question of title to the disputed strip of land the respondent is entitled to the costs of this appeal hearing fee is assessed at two gold ..... of this remand order the appellant has raised no question nor has the respondent attacked the form of the remand order 5 with regard to the claim of easement by the defendant the court of appeal below held that inasmuch as the suit was .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 11 1935 (FN)

Chandler and Price Co. Vs. Brandtjen and Kluge, Inc.

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Nov-11-1935

..... shall claim an interest in the matters there in controversy between the plaintiff and original defendant the purpose for which permission to intervene may be given is that the applicant may ..... user of a machine the manufacturer of the accused article was permitted to intervene page 296 u s 54 it thereupon answered jointly with the defendant denying infringement and challenging the plaintiff s .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 20 1935 (PC)

Walter Smith and Another Vs. Ahmed Abdeenbhoy Peerbhoy

Court : Privy Council

Decided on : Jun-20-1935

Reported in : AIR1935PC154

..... business proceeded on the term that the defendant assumed responsibility for the debits resulting from the consignments in the constituents name in the result this appeal should be allowed the decree of the high court in appeal should he set aside and the decree of kemp j dated 4th april 1929 should be restored the respondent must pay the costs of the appeal to the high court and to his majesty .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 04 1935 (PC)

Kedar Nath Goenka Vs. Munshi Ram NaraIn Lal and Others

Court : Privy Council

Decided on : Jun-04-1935

..... is again in issue between these same defendants who are now ranged as plaintiff and defendant 1 though the subject matter of this suit is different and the decision in the ..... court sale to his father of these properties was confirmed and on confirmation became absolute defendant 3 ram narayan preferred a separate appeal to the high court claiming an independent title .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 16 1935 (PC)

Ram Krishna Prodhan Vs. Srimati Kousalya Manidasi and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-16-1935

Reported in : 158Ind.Cas.925

..... exhibit a 1 however stands on a different footing the vendee in this instance is defendant no 1 himself and the effect of the sale has therefore to be decided let ..... a 1 must be included in the partition and should be included in the plaintiff respondent s allotment when allotments are made by the commissioner there must be a further variation .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 03 1935 (PC)

Thoilokhya Nath Das and ors. Vs. Kenaram Das and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-03-1935

Reported in : 163Ind.Cas.663

..... may have been forthcoming to show that all exertion was not on the part of defendant no 1 alone we have not allowed this point to be raised in appeal 13 ..... with regard to sunderbans property as all labour that was employed in reclaiming was by defendant no 1 he was entitled to a double share in the surendraganj property and our .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 26 1935 (PC)

Secy. of State Vs. Brajendra Kishore Rai Choudhury and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-26-1935

Reported in : AIR1936Cal629

..... it is also reported by the serving peon that respondent 10 12 is dead this will not affect our decision seeing that these persons were all heirs of defendant 4 who as has been pointed out before us had no interest in the ..... been filed in 1929 dr sen gupta appearing for the plaintiff respondent objected to the adjournment contending that defendant 4 was not a necessary party to these appeals as the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 05 1935 (PC)

Bibhuti Bhusan Ghose Vs. Baikuntha Nath Mondal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-05-1935

Reported in : 164Ind.Cas.477

..... by the materials on the record has been considered above on the side of the defendant no 6 respondent reliance was placed on the decision of their lordships of the judicial committee of the ..... that rule has never been departed from up till now on the side of the defendant no 6 respondent it was urged that the plaintiff as a stranger to the contract could not under .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 13 1935 (PC)

Sureudra Nath Roy Vs. Kedar Nath Bose and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Dec-13-1935

Reported in : AIR1936Cal87

..... the whole amount of rs 6 900 as it has been conceded on behalf of defendant 1 that defendants 2 and 3 have paid the purchase money the appeal is allowed ..... this court and also of the court below the costs are to be recovered from defendant 1 and defendants 2 and 3 in equal proportions the plaintiff must bring into court .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //