Defendant - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: defendant Year: 1935 Page 1 of about 437 results (0.891 seconds)(Saiyed) Alam Ali Vs. Beni Charan and ors.
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Oct-22-1935
Reported in : AIR1936All33; 160Ind.Cas.541
..... and the respondent babu bansidhar defendant 1 as between themselves have become the owners in equal shares of the village patara ..... referring order and are as follows the plaintiff respondent brought a suit on the basis of a mortgage deed dated 2nd september 1919 against his mortgagor and the defendant appellant who is a subsequent mortgagee the defendant appellant holds a mortgage of 22nd april .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDakshina Ranjan Choudhury Vs. Surendra Lal Das Gupta
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : May-29-1935
Reported in : AIR1936Cal310,163Ind.Cas.56
..... would cover only the question of title to the disputed strip of land the respondent is entitled to the costs of this appeal hearing fee is assessed at two gold ..... of this remand order the appellant has raised no question nor has the respondent attacked the form of the remand order 5 with regard to the claim of easement by the defendant the court of appeal below held that inasmuch as the suit was .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChandler and Price Co. Vs. Brandtjen and Kluge, Inc.
Court : US Supreme Court
Decided on : Nov-11-1935
..... shall claim an interest in the matters there in controversy between the plaintiff and original defendant the purpose for which permission to intervene may be given is that the applicant may ..... user of a machine the manufacturer of the accused article was permitted to intervene page 296 u s 54 it thereupon answered jointly with the defendant denying infringement and challenging the plaintiff s .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWalter Smith and Another Vs. Ahmed Abdeenbhoy Peerbhoy
Court : Privy Council
Decided on : Jun-20-1935
Reported in : AIR1935PC154
..... business proceeded on the term that the defendant assumed responsibility for the debits resulting from the consignments in the constituents name in the result this appeal should be allowed the decree of the high court in appeal should he set aside and the decree of kemp j dated 4th april 1929 should be restored the respondent must pay the costs of the appeal to the high court and to his majesty .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKedar Nath Goenka Vs. Munshi Ram NaraIn Lal and Others
Court : Privy Council
Decided on : Jun-04-1935
..... is again in issue between these same defendants who are now ranged as plaintiff and defendant 1 though the subject matter of this suit is different and the decision in the ..... court sale to his father of these properties was confirmed and on confirmation became absolute defendant 3 ram narayan preferred a separate appeal to the high court claiming an independent title .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRam Krishna Prodhan Vs. Srimati Kousalya Manidasi and ors.
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : May-16-1935
Reported in : 158Ind.Cas.925
..... exhibit a 1 however stands on a different footing the vendee in this instance is defendant no 1 himself and the effect of the sale has therefore to be decided let ..... a 1 must be included in the partition and should be included in the plaintiff respondent s allotment when allotments are made by the commissioner there must be a further variation .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThoilokhya Nath Das and ors. Vs. Kenaram Das and ors.
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : May-03-1935
Reported in : 163Ind.Cas.663
..... may have been forthcoming to show that all exertion was not on the part of defendant no 1 alone we have not allowed this point to be raised in appeal 13 ..... with regard to sunderbans property as all labour that was employed in reclaiming was by defendant no 1 he was entitled to a double share in the surendraganj property and our .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSecy. of State Vs. Brajendra Kishore Rai Choudhury and ors.
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Aug-26-1935
Reported in : AIR1936Cal629
..... it is also reported by the serving peon that respondent 10 12 is dead this will not affect our decision seeing that these persons were all heirs of defendant 4 who as has been pointed out before us had no interest in the ..... been filed in 1929 dr sen gupta appearing for the plaintiff respondent objected to the adjournment contending that defendant 4 was not a necessary party to these appeals as the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBibhuti Bhusan Ghose Vs. Baikuntha Nath Mondal and ors.
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Apr-05-1935
Reported in : 164Ind.Cas.477
..... by the materials on the record has been considered above on the side of the defendant no 6 respondent reliance was placed on the decision of their lordships of the judicial committee of the ..... that rule has never been departed from up till now on the side of the defendant no 6 respondent it was urged that the plaintiff as a stranger to the contract could not under .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSureudra Nath Roy Vs. Kedar Nath Bose and ors.
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Dec-13-1935
Reported in : AIR1936Cal87
..... the whole amount of rs 6 900 as it has been conceded on behalf of defendant 1 that defendants 2 and 3 have paid the purchase money the appeal is allowed ..... this court and also of the court below the costs are to be recovered from defendant 1 and defendants 2 and 3 in equal proportions the plaintiff must bring into court .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT