Defendant - Year 1925 - Judgments

Feb 11 1925 (PC)

Sree Lal Chamaria Vs. Sir Hariram Goenka and anr.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Feb-11-1925

Reported in: AIR1926Cal181,88Ind.Cas.737

..... mortgage as he was bound to do before he could demand a conveyance from the defendant of the howrah properties in terms of the contracts admitted by him the prayer portion ..... april upon which reliance was placed by his learned counsel the plaintiff intimated to the defendant that the conveyance which he was ready and willing to accept would require the receiver .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 17 1925 (PC)

(Rani) Prayag Kumari Debi and ors. Vs. Siva Prosad Singh

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Aug-17-1925

Reported in: AIR1926Cal1

..... was kept under double lock which was opened on the day the name of the defendant was entered in the rokar but he cannot say where that book is he says ..... the life time of the late raja it was however contended on behalf of the respondent that unrealized rents cannot be regarded as a self acquisition as they still adhere to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 23 1925 (PC)

Purasawalkam Hindu Janopakara Saswatha Nidhi, Ltd. Vs. Kuddus Sahib an ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-23-1925

Reported in: AIR1926Mad841; 94Ind.Cas.860

..... manner without notice to him on the other hand it was argued for the 1st respondent that this being a suit for the balance of the mortgage debt by the setting ..... opinion that the learned judge s decision that the plaintiff s claim against the 1st defendant also fails is correct in this case 28 before closing i should like to add .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 16 1925 (PC)

Shyama Bhai Vs. Purushothamadoss

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-16-1925

Reported in: AIR1925Mad645; 90Ind.Cas.124

..... was a fair reasonable and proper one which would protect her interest according to the defendant all she was entitled to was the interest at 31 2 per cent on government ..... is that these properties belong to her and are now in the possession of the defendant the defendant in his written statement admits thai items 5 6 and 7 are in his possession .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 01 1925 (PC)

S. Veeraraghava Achariar and ors. Vs. V. Parthasarathy Iyengar and ors ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: May-01-1925

Reported in: AIR1925Mad1070

..... to carry on the administration of affairs we are also satisfied that though the 1st defendant has not committed any acts amounting to a gross and serious breach of trust still ..... if any had been made we have therefore come to the conclusion that the 2nd defendant has at any rate latterly been thoroughly inefficient and failed systematically to realise his individual .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 21 1925 (PC)

K. V. Perlyamanna Marakkayar and Sons Vs. Banians and Co.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-21-1925

Reported in: 95Ind.Cas.154

..... the breach of contract has decreed damages to be paid to the plaintiffs the 2nd defendant company has appealed to us making the plaintiff company the sole respondent to the appeal 48 it was contended for the plaintiff company respondents that the first defendant company was a necessary party to the appeal and that the appeal should be dismissed .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 02 1925 (PC)

S.A. Muhammad Yakub Sahib Vs. Mahaboo Bi Bi and anr.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-02-1925

Reported in: 94Ind.Cas.756

..... n 684 p c it is said for the respondent that this was payable for two years only as defendant no 2 was necessarily out of possession for this period that is of course ..... a collusive and fictitious document got up between defendant no 1 and defendant no 2 for the purpose of attempting to place the property of defendant no 1 beyond the reach of plaintiff in his execution proceedings in my opinion it .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 16 1925 (PC)

Natarajan and ors. Vs. P. M. A. Muthiah Chetty (Deceased) and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-16-1925

Reported in: 95Ind.Cas.972

..... father s property together with the legitimate son it is urged on appellants behalf that respondent is not entitled to maintenance after he attains his age but we are unable to ..... the period i hold that she was under the protection of muthiah chetty the 1st defendant from 1904 or 1905 till 1919 and that the plaintiffs are the children born of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 22 1925 (PC)

R. Bhunjanga Rao Vs. Periyathambi Goundan and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jul-22-1925

Reported in: 92Ind.Cas.1047

..... the decrees of the courts below by declaring that the sale notices issued by the defendant are invalid in so far as the excess rent charged under ex x is concerned ..... this point must be decided against the appellant thought this was not suggested by the respondent s vakil at the time of argument and there was no discussion on it at .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 24 1925 (PC)

Dost Muhammad Khan Sahib and ors. Vs. Kadar Batcha Sahib

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jul-24-1925

Reported in: 92Ind.Cas.950

..... trustee this is not mentioned as a specific charge of breach of trust against the defendant in the items a to n mentioned in para 8 of the plaint but it ..... it was suggested that even if there is no case made out for removing the defendant from the management of the mosque we should frame a scheme for its management in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Defendant - Judgment Search Results