Defendant - Judgment Search Results

In Re Moore

Court: US Supreme Court

..... be added that this case was brought in a state court and removed by the defendant into the federal court under the second section of the act of august 13 1888 ..... removed into the circuit court of the united states for the proper district by the defendant or defendants therein being nonresidents of that state and it is settled that in order .....

Mccabe and Steen Construction Co. Vs. Wilson

Court: US Supreme Court

..... work and the injury it is apparent that there was a question whether the defendant had made suitable provision for securing a safe structure upon which the trains should pass ..... submitted to the decision of a jury notwithstanding the able argument of counsel for defendant in endeavoring to show that the defendant did everything that prudence required for the purpose of making the bridge safe we are .....

Mati Lal Pal Vs. Preo Nath Mitra and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 3Ind.Cas.696

..... debtor himself 12 it was strenuously urged on behalf of the respondents that although the defendant no 2 might have been bound by the kobala if it had been in strict ..... essential question involved in this appeal under section 15 of the letters patent is whether defendant no 2 who is the principal respondent in this appeal is affected by the doctrine of us pendens the facts which raise .....

Maharaja Manindra Chandra Nandi Vs. Upendra Chandra Hazra

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 2Ind.Cas.828

..... court that when it is shown what the defendant s previous rent was it is for the plaintiff to justify the enhancement of rent ..... of the rate of rent payable by the defendant it therefore has not the effect of res judicata 11 we accordingly dismiss these appeals ..... was no dispute between the plaintiff and the defendant which the execution of the kabuliats now sued on was intended to settle that being .....

St. Louis, I.M. and S. Ry. Co. Vs. Taylor

Court: US Supreme Court

..... default the employer is not responsible in the case before us the liability of the defendant does not grow out of the common law duty of master to servant the congress ..... to use the shims that was the negligence of a fellow servant for which the defendant was not responsible in deciding the questions thus raised upon which the courts have differed .....

Bennett Vs. Bennett

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of the court a necessity to her prevented her from enforcing the order and the defendant may have deliberately planned to that end and it may have appeared to the court ..... one whether under the statute giving the power to a court to allow a defaulting defendant to answer upon such terms as may be just the order in controversy was within .....

Venner Vs. Great Northern Ry. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the decree saying p 196 u s 587 the ultimate interest of the corporation made defendant may be the same as that of the stockholder made plaintiff but the corporation may ..... necessarily made defendants and neither can for jurisdictional purposes be regarded otherwise than as a defendant davenport v dows 18 wall 626 central railroad company v mills 113 u s 249 .....

Dotson Vs. Milliken

Court: US Supreme Court

..... on the plaintiff could not recover at all events he said enough to warn the defendant to make some necessary amendments he gave as his reason for refusing the instructions asked ..... alleged in the declaration that said purchaser was found that no agreement existed between the defendant and said southern railway company to build said branch railroad but that the subject of .....

Phillips Vs. Mobile

Court: US Supreme Court

..... reversed the court holding that the trial court should have refused the request of the defendant and directed the jury to find a verdict for the plaintiff the case was therefore ..... said kegs as original packages ever became broken or open but the deliveries by the defendant to his respective customers of said beer was always in the same original usual commercial .....

Armour Packing Co. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... made by demurrer or motion and overruled it would not avail the defendant in error proceedings unless it appeared that the substantial rights of the accused were prejudiced by the refusal to require a more specific statement ..... offense may be described in the words of the statute and it is for the defendant to show that greater particularity is required by reason of the omission from the statute .....