Skip to content


Default - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: default Page 1 of about 601 results (0.211 seconds)
Jul 02 2008 (HC)

Sangram S/O. Pandharinath Jaibhai Vs. Maharashtra State Road Transport ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2008(5)ALLMR71; 2009(2)BomCR399; (2008)110BOMLR2444; 2008(6)MhLj737

p r borkar j 1 this writ petition is filed by an employee who was previously working with the respondents...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 18 1936 (FN)

Duplate Corp. Vs. Triplex Safety Glass Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

duplate corp v triplex safety glass co 298 u s 448 1936 u s supreme court duplate corp v triplex...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

1792

Duffield Vs. Stille

Court: US Supreme Court

duffield v stille 2 u s 156 1792 u s supreme court duffield v stille 2 u s 156 1792...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 03 1978 (HC)

T.K. Roy, Vs. Commissioner of Wealth-tax

Court: Guwahati

..... under section 14 1 of the act has committed a default and the default is continuing from day to day till he submitted the ..... as re quired sunder s 14 1 has committed a default and the default is continuing from that date till he submitted the return ..... penalty differentfrom the one provided in the original act for the default 51 mr bhattacharjee learned counsel for the assessee next submits that .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 04 2019 (HC)

Aarti Khantwal vs.union of India and Anr.

Court: Delhi

..... the impugned list the petitioners also challenge the list of disqualified directors published subsequently for defaults pertaining to the financial years 2012 2014 and 2013 2015 the petitioners impugn the ..... contentions and contend that sufficient opportunity had been provided to the petitioners to correct the default of not filing the statutory documents 6 these petitions were heard together as the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 04 2019 (HC)

Mukut Pathak & Ors. Vs.union of India and Anr.

Court: Delhi

..... the impugned list the petitioners also challenge the list of disqualified directors published subsequently for defaults pertaining to the financial years 2012 2014 and 2013 2015 the petitioners impugn the ..... contentions and contend that sufficient opportunity had been provided to the petitioners to correct the default of not filing the statutory documents 6 these petitions were heard together as the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 25 2013 (HC)

Krishnasamy Vs. Kannika

Court: Chennai

..... unlike rent control statutes of other states the expression willful default or habitual default has not been used therein the words are is ..... dismissing his application for eviction sought on the ground of willful default 2 the case of the landlord petitioner is as follows ..... to appreciate the incidence of tendering the entire amount under default before the institution of the suit as a result the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 27 2011 (FN)

Belmont Park Investments Pty Limited (Respondent) Vs. Bny Corporate Tr ...

Court: UK Supreme Court

..... qualified by the safe harbour provisions of section 560 which specifically protect a non defaulting swap participant s contractual rights to liquidate terminate or accelerate a swap agreement because ..... swaps being deemed automatically to have terminated on the occurrence of specified events of default including bankruptcy however in the swap confirmations for all cases the parties did specify .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 30 2013 (TRI)

M/S. Jasper Energy Private Limited., Karnataka Represented by T. Rajes ...

Court: Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

..... petition mainly on the ground that the appellant alone was mainly responsible for the said defaults and that the appellant instead of following dispute resolution redressal mechanism as per the ppa ..... the ppa due to its financial position thus hescom failed in its financial obligations and defaulted in payments thus calling for termination of the ppa though hescom mentioned casually that there .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 19 2013 (HC)

Deputy Commissioner of Customs Vs. AyeshA.A.V.

Court: Kerala

..... and proceeded against under the customs attachment of property of defaulters for recovery of government dues rules 1995 hereinafter referred to ..... part assert ignorance of any of the proceedings since the defaulter though alive is living separated from the records we discern ..... and where any government dues are not paid by any defaulter rule 3 confers power on the assistant commissioner or deputy .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //