Decree - Judgment Search Results

Grunewald Vs. U.S.

Court: US Supreme Court

grunewald v u s 352 u s 866 1956 u s supreme court grunewald v u s 352 u s...

Mesarosh Vs. Us

Court: US Supreme Court

not even hypothetically assume the trustworthiness of the evidence in order to pass on other issues there is more at stake

Missouri Pacific Railroad Company 5 1/4% Secured Serial

Court: US Supreme Court

missouri pacific railroad company 5 1 4 secured serial 350 u s 959 1956 u s supreme court missouri pacific...

Thompson Vs. Coastal Oil Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

thompson v coastal oil co 352 u s 862 1956 u s supreme court thompson v coastal oil co 352...

U.S. Vs. State of Louisiana

Court: US Supreme Court

of new wells in the disputed tidelands area pending further order of this court unless by agreement of the parties filed

State of WisconsIn Vs. State of Illinois

Court: US Supreme Court

..... caused by low water in the mississippi river paragraph 3 of the decree in these causes issued on april 21 1930 281 u s 696 ..... as the corps of engineers shall direct the entry of this order shall not prejudice the legal rights of any of the parties to ..... waters involved after january 31 1957 all provisions of the decree entered on april 21 1930 shall remain in full force and effect until .....

Cities Service Gas Producing Company Vs. Federal Power

Court: US Supreme Court

cities service gas producing company v federal power 352 u s 911 1956 u s supreme court cities service gas...

Kalka Prasad Ram Charan Vs. Harish Chandra

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1957All25

..... the opportunity of producing evidence we can therefore record a finding on this point ourselves order 41 rule 24 civil p c lays down that where the evidence upon the record is ..... by cantonment board being covered under rule 2 f of the cantonment fund servants rules 1937 can file appeal under rules 13 14 and 15 to authorities provided therein against any order imposing any penalties etc deolali .....

Minister-in-charge, Income-tax Vs. Pran Nath Om Parkash.

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Reported in: 195630ITR817(Hyd.)

in charge is competent to hear an appeal from the order passed by an appellate officer under section 31 of the

V.S. Sundaram and anr. Vs. Laisram Achou Singh

Court: Guwahati

Reported in: 1956CriLJ1411

..... with other arrested persons filed an application for obtaining a writ of habeas corpus under article 226 of the constitution of india for quashing ..... challenging those findings but it was further held in this ruling that the jurisdiction in contempt proceedings for what is called ..... decision appealed against and it was further held in this ruling that it would be opposed to all principles and precedents .....