Skip to content


Decree - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: decree Sorted by: old Year: 1913 Page 1 of about 433 results (0.523 seconds)
1913

Northern Pacific Ry. Co. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1913

..... that are clear and convincing assuming without deciding that the rule applies to a case in which the government is proceeding in ..... the circuit court accepted the barnard survey and entered an decree cancelling the patents the decree was affirmed by the circuit court of appeals 191 ..... 1093 c 559 as amended 26 stat 1099 c 561 decree affirmed sec 1 that the secretary of the interior be and he .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

1913

United States Vs. Patten

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1913

..... its opinion given at the time although not containing any express ruling upon the point of difference shows that the counts were treated ..... erroneous construction of the statute alleged to have been violated in order to decide whether acts charged are within the condemnation of a ..... no such statement a difference not here material footnote 3 in order that the brief summary and analysis of the third part .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

1913

United States Vs. Baltimore and Ohio R. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1913

..... relief was denied and its petition dismissed without prejudice in that proceeding it was ruled by the commission that the free lighterage arrangements theretofore made by the carriers were the ..... court alleging the invalidity and illegality of the order and sought an injunction pendente lite and a permanent injunction against its enforcement an injunction until the cause could be finally heard was .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

1913

Union Pacific R. Co. Vs. Laramie Stock Yards Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1913

union pacific r co v laramie stock yards co 231 u s 190 1913 u s supreme court union pacific...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 02 1913 (PC)

Emperor Vs. Rama and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Jan-02-1913

Reported in: (1913)ILR35All136

promulgated or to prove that the person who issued the order was authorized to issue it moreover if the order be

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 02 1913 (PC)

Sukhbir Singh Vs. Nihal Singh and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Jan-02-1913

Reported in: 18Ind.Cas.232

..... our opinion the appeal should prevail and we accordingly allow the appeal set aside the decree of the court below and dismiss the suit with costs to be borne by the ..... 5 the court below has made a somewhat peculiar decree which is in our opinion very unsatisfactory the decree is in the following terms it is ordered and decreed that it is declared that neither .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 02 1913 (PC)

Venkatesaperumal Chetty Vs. S. Parthasarathy Iyengar

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-02-1913

Reported in: 18Ind.Cas.986

..... would have fetched a much less price sitting here as a jury and applying the rule in mayne on damages 8th edition page 228 and jones v just l r 2 ..... to or deterioration or diminution in quantity of any of the goods so that in order to bring the case within the exception the defendant must show that there has been .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 02 1913 (PC)

Shangser Ali and ors. Vs. Sheikh Hadanulla

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jan-02-1913

Reported in: 18Ind.Cas.82

1 the question which arises in this appeal is one of some little difficulty inasmuch as at first sight various...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 03 1913 (PC)

NaraIn Dei Vs. Durga Dei and anr.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Jan-03-1913

Reported in: (1913)ILR35All138

..... with costs in all courts civil procedure code 1908 section 66 execution of decree benami purchase claim against certified purchaser but not by representative of the ..... delay of referring issues we granted time to the parties in order that the evidence might be looked into as a result we ..... was put up to sale in execution of a simple money decree against the real owner and purchased in the name of musammat .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 03 1913 (PC)

Anantha Lakshmi Ammal Vs. Kunnanchankarath Sankaran Nair

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-03-1913

Reported in: (1913)24MLJ205

..... the subordinate judge s view that the applicant was not entitled to apply under rule 89 of order xxi must therefore be rejected 5 the case is one in which a second appeal ..... the whole of the amount due to him to justify an application under order xxi rule 89 the applicant had therefore satisfied the requirements of the rule within the period allowed to her under the law but it may at least equally .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //